trade...

[gram 0]

i give fitz, he gives sjax. is it worth it. is sjax going to get out of his slump?

 

i have also been offered i give fitz favre and chris johnson for westy and anthony gonzalez

 

would love your input on both. will answer yours. thanks.

[Tacks 0]

I wouldn't want S Jackson. That offense is horrible. Keep Fitz. I would stay put if I were you.

[mdbomb 5]

I agree with Tacks, that I would stay put. Unless you are desperate for RB and have a lot of good WR. Without knowing your full roster, I'd stick with Fitz.

[dtskds 0]

I agree I would stick with what I have unless someone makes you a better offer than that.

 

 

 

Thanks for answering mine.

[P.I. 0]

1st offer can be tempting, depending on your depth at WR and need at RB. St Louis started blocking better towards the end of the giants game, but I agree they look bad thus far. All offense will go through SJax though. I might pull the trigger.

 

2nd offer, stay put. no way!

[TheSithLord 0]

Thanks for helping with mine.

 

I would stay put. I have been SJax owner for last 2 years and I love him as a player. But the offense struggles a lot. I have started seeing desperation on SJax's face. I use to regularly follow his blog and he always had a postive attitude. I am not sure if he still does that but judging with what he was saying last year - he believes Rams get better as season goes by. I dont think that is going to happen, Bulger gets 2 seconds to snap and throw (Kills being a Holt owner).

 

For SJax - he will have average games with 60 yards rushing, 30 yards recieving and few games with 100+yards.

 

The second offer can basically be read as fitz favre and chris johnson for westy . What is your QB situation? In any case i dont think favre gives a big upgrade.

 

Chris Johnson might soon be the man in tenesse, but you can do much better for westbrook.