Disposable Hero 0 Posted July 30, 2009 I can protect one of the two. I'm already protecting ADP & Fitz. This is a 14 team salary cap/Keeper league. We start 2 RB's and 3 WR's. The scoring for RB's is: 1 pt for 10yds rush, every 3 recpt., and 20 yds rec. Scoring for WR's is:1 pt for 10yds rec., every 3 recpt., and 20 yds rush. Bonus 1 point for 100/150/200yds rush/rec. for both positions. Who would you choose & why? Leave a link and I'll answer yours? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stewburtx8 67 Posted July 30, 2009 I can protect one of the two. I'm already protecting ADP & Fitz. This is a 14 team salary cap/Keeper league. We start 2 RB's and 3 WR's. The scoring for RB's is: 1 pt for 10yds rush, every 3 recpt., and 20 yds rec. Scoring for WR's is:1 pt for 10yds rec., every 3 recpt., and 20 yds rush. Bonus 1 point for 100/150/200yds rush/rec. for both positions. Who would you choose & why? Leave a link and I'll answer yours? I think Welker will be much more productive this year and is a fine option as a #2 WR. With the point per every 3 receptions he should hit that every week and even have close to 6+ receptions every week. With Brady back I could see him again in the 7-10 TD range. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bull19007 0 Posted August 1, 2009 Tough call without seeing what players are not in draft pool. If draft pool is RB poor, I'd keep Stewart vice versa with Welker if WR pool is poor. Unless Welker scores more than 5 td's, then the scoring breaks down as potentially even if not slightly in Stewart's favor. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites