Corporal Punishment
Members-
Content Count
34 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
0 NeutralAbout Corporal Punishment
-
Rank
FF Rookie
-
San Diego Chargers and Dallas Cowboys
Corporal Punishment replied to CornKobb's topic in FFToday Board
Just to be clear: I was being ironic when I brought up Roy Williams. I consider him a huge bust for the Cowboys. I could have used one of those cute emoticons to make my tone clear, but I'm allergic to them. Sorry. -
San Diego Chargers and Dallas Cowboys
Corporal Punishment replied to CornKobb's topic in FFToday Board
They had Roy Williams. -
Just to clarify my vote: In a redraft league, hell yes. In a dynasty or keeper: maybe not.
-
In my dynasty league, many of the other owners and I openly scoffed at another owner who drafted Wilson before Matt Flynn. Who looks stupid now?
-
I am rather found of the fourth slot. Rodgers often gets picked in the first three which means I still get one of the top three RBs. If not, then I'm OK with Rodgers as my #1 pick. At the end of the first/beginning of second round you can often get Brees or Stafford as well as a second-tier RB.
-
I think you should include IDPs on the rosters. Would it be still possible to have Team Defense/Special Teams?
-
better keeper Charles or d Thomas?
Corporal Punishment replied to bfavre4ever's topic in FFToday Board
I'd stick with Charles, even though he might not have a great year. I like both Maclin and Thomas this year, but there is a great deal of depth at WR and a number of players with an equal chance to score like those two. -
Calvin Johnson on Madden 2013 Cover
Corporal Punishment replied to mobb_deep's topic in FFToday Board
Note that the only other Wide Receiver to appear on the cover of Madden was Larry Fitzgerald on Madden 10, and the curse didn't seem to affect his performance or fantasy points. Perhaps receivers are immune to the curse. Or maybe all of the curse went to Polamalu for the shared cover. -
Anyone know much about what's going on with Green Bay's running game? They didn't draft or sign anyone new, and it looks like Ryan Grant is gone, so James Starks seems the undisputed starter, as underwhelming as he was last year. I know they like Brandon Saine in passing situations, but I didn't hear much about Alex Green last year. Do they still like him? Is Saine the primary backup? Will they run a committee?
-
I remember this being debated in earnest a couple years ago; I think last year demonstrated pretty clearly the limitations of both. Peterson has a better attitude and more versatile ability. He's constantly working on improving and seems to give %100 on every down he plays. On the other hand, his running style seeks out contact and injuries are going to go along with that. We saw last year what can go wrong with Johnson even when his body is healthy. He doesn't seem as humble or as committed to his team as ADP. However, CJ2K will probably have a longer shelf life due to his running style. I do object to the characterization of ADP as having “no WR talent in front of him.” I really like Percy Harvin despite having Christian Ponder as a QB. Generally, I would predict ADP is likely to give you more in the games he plays, but you will get more games out of CJ2K.
-
Do you really think they will take Floyd over Blackmon?
-
***Official Seattle Seahawks Thread 2012***
Corporal Punishment replied to phillybear's topic in FFToday Board
Here's another Peter King tidbit, already partially quoted earlier in this thread: Ten things I think I think with this year's draft approaching 4. In the unlikely event Tannehill makes it out of the top 10, I believe he'll be the 11th overall pick. That spot belongs to the Chiefs. I don't see the Chiefs taking Tannehill. I see Kansas City taking the best offer for the pick, and there will certainly be offers for that pick if Tannehill slips. Still, the most likely scenarios are Tannehill to Cleveland at four or Miami at eight. But why 11? Because teams around the league know how much Seattle loves Tannehill. And you can write this down: If Tannehill were to be there at 12, Seattle would take him, even though the Seahawks just paid medium dollar for Matt Flynn in free agency. That's how much Seattle loves him. "At Tannehill's workout,'' one source told me, "[coach] Pete Carroll was giggling like a schoolgirl watching him throw. His attitude was like, 'What are we even doing here? He'll never be there for us.' '' Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/peter_king/04/16/countdown/index.html#ixzz1sMy6xPWx Awesome devious tactic if this is really only a ploy by Carroll/Schneider to force another team to pull the trigger early. -
What if Andrew Luck decided to stay in college and play his final year?
Corporal Punishment replied to edjr's topic in FFToday Board
If he had a shred of decency? Sheesh.. He will complete his BA from Stanford this year --it is his fourth year-- he just has a year of eligibility left if he wanted to stick around and play football, as he didn't play his freshman year. There was a lot of pressure on him to go into the draft last year, but he didn't, because he wanted to finish his education and not just cash in, despite the obvious risk. I'd call that having at least a shred of decency. But if he now goes back on his word, and holds out for another year--Why? for more money? A better team?-- that would indicate he has more decency? -
Seattle Quarterback Options
Corporal Punishment replied to Corporal Punishment's topic in FFToday Board
My current prediction: the Seahawks take a Defensive Lineman and a Linebacker with the first two picks and the best quarterback on the board in round three. Regardless of whether they sign a free agent QB, which I doubt at this point. -
Seattle Quarterback Options
Corporal Punishment replied to Corporal Punishment's topic in FFToday Board
The last couple mock drafts I've looked at has Kirk Cousins of Michigan State going to Seattle in the second round. Evidently he had a great performance at the combine as well as the Senior Bowl, so he might be the fourth QB off the board, after Tannehill but before Weeden or Osweiler. Any impressions of this guy?