axels08 0 Posted August 10, 2006 HELP PLEASE. I HAVE NO SECOND BACK AFTER ALEXANDER. WELL I HAVE BENSON/JONES. MY QUESTION IS I HAVE BEEN OFFERED A TRADE THAT I JUST.....DON'T....KNOW. DO I WAIT AND SEE WHAT SHAKES OUT BETWEEN THE 2 BEARS OF TRADE MY 2 STUD W/R'S FOR HOLT AND WESTBROOK. THANKS THEN I WOULD HAVE BULGER,ALEX., WESTBROOK, HOLT, TJ HOUSH OR KEEP BULGER, ALEX., BENSON/JONES, HARRISON, FITZ, TJ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Son of Squirrel 0 Posted August 10, 2006 You are giving up WAY too much. Two top tier WRs for second/maybe third running back and top wr? No way. See is he would take Harrison/TJ instead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Mexico 0 Posted August 10, 2006 I disagree. If you can get Westbrook, then you should make the deal. Holt is also an upper eschelon WR. If the deal is Harrison & Fitz for Holt & Westbrook, definately make this deal. You need another nice RB. Go out and trade for Moats as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bananarama 0 Posted August 11, 2006 If the deal is Harrison & Fitz for Holt & Westbrook,definately make this deal. I agree...counter propose a trade for that...you still want to have a great WR... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites