Trade help..which one should I do?

[NebraskaRRT 0]

My roster start qb, rb, wr, wr, te, flex, k, d

 

McNair

LJ, Gore, duece, buck, morris, MJD

Boldin, Bryant, Cotchery, Evans

Gates

Hall

ATL D

 

Sounds like for sure I can do....Duece and Bryant for Holt and Jacobs.

 

Or do I try....

 

Gore and Cotchery for Lamont and Holt?

 

Thank you kindly!

[tampa_fan_01 0]

If you can get lamont and holt DO IT!

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=239273

[dalie 2]

Lamont and Holt for sure! No RBBC and a top WR!

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=239274

[Puntarelli 0]

My main question would be: Is that flex RB/WR or WR/TE?

 

I'll assume the former.

 

Holt is a wonderful upgrade at wr if you can work Cotchery for him

 

I think Morris will be a very consistent #2 back for you for at least the next month or so (Seatle has a bye week 5)

 

The 49ers are stalling contract negotiations with Gore because they question his duability

and Jordan still has tremendous upside in my book (till Monday anyway )

 

And Jacobs may end up seeing a lot of carries (especially near the goal line) towards the end of the year

 

My crystal ball is a bit fuzzy, and there are a lot of ifs here.

 

I think Horn is very good thing, and losing Gore/Cotchery is less of a gamble than losing Bryant

You'll end up with a great #1 RB in LJ

and an awesome 1, 2, 3 in Holt, Boldin and Bryant

 

Now about that QB........might be time to scour the waiver wire

 

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=239268

[NebraskaRRT 0]

The flex position is rb/wr/te.

 

Just having a tough time figuring out what deal would be the best for my team going forward. Not sure if he would take cotchery..it might take evans. I like evans.

 

So doing trade 1....

 

McNair

LJ, Gore, Buck, Morris, MJD, Jacobs

Boldin, Holt, Evans, Cotchery

Gates

 

Trade 2

 

McNair

LJ, Lamont, Buck, morris, MJD, Duece

Boldin, Holt, Bryant, Cotchery or Evans

Gates

 

I just feel that Gore will continue to put up monster numbers. I cant resist getting 2 elite wr on my team for starters. Either way for a 16 team i would be in great position...minus the QB position. Working on fixing that. Sad to say I am 2-2 (double header in week 2). Had second in points in week 1..faced #1 in points. Bye week with LJ and Gates out hit my team hard.

 

After looking at thinks Deal 2 looks better...I think....

[NebraskaRRT 0]

Anyone out there so early this mornin?

[Rio Gamblers 0]

I would go with Trade 1. I like Gore also and at least he has Alex Smith to keep the defense honest. Jordan adn OAK are still trying to figure out their identity.

 

Thanks for answering mine. To answer your question from my post, I have Cadillac and Pittman and my other was M. Robinson, Gore's backup. I am not sure if I should start J. Jones & MBIII or J. Jones and M. Robinson. Traditional scoring system.

[dcg 0]

I think it all depends on how you feel about Gore's injury situation. He's significantly outplayed Jordan to this (admittedly early) point in the season. That being said, even without the current problem, Gore has a history of injury (at least in college), and you're trading two guys who are somewhat coming out of nowhere for a couple of more proven guys.

 

I'd do it. Thanks for mine.

[bobpate17 0]

I say do the first trade. You can always start Gore as flex and he will get you more points than duce (who is sharing carries with bush) and more than any WR u can start as flex. so I say do the first trade. Jordan is good but his offance worries me.

 

thanks for mine

[NebraskaRRT 0]

Anyone else..making the offer in just a few minutes.

[bauman88 0]

I'd take lamont and holt.

 

Holt is a top 10 WR

Jordan will rebound

Gore has questions now

Crotchery also is ?able

 

see me

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...=238499&hl=