philssteelers200 0 Posted October 18, 2006 PPR League: He offered Gore and Galloway for Jordan and Wayne.... My team (5-1): QB M. Bulger WR D. Jackson WR R. Wayne WR E. Kennison RB R. Brown RB L. Jordan TE J. Wiggins W/T J. Stevens W/R T. Williamson BN J. Norwood BN J. Lewis BN T. Heap BN D. Bennett BN T. Green K S. Graham DEF Jacksonville BN New York His team: (4-2) J. Kitna WR J. Galloway WR Br. Johnson WR M. Harrison RB F. Taylor RB M. Jones-Drew TE A. Gates W/T B. Edwards W/R K. Barlow BN D. Bledsoe BN J. Horn BN S. Jackson BN F. Gore BN R. Grossman BN T. Taylor K J. Scobee DEF San Diego I originally offered Wayne and Jordan for Jackson and Galloway, he changed Jackson for Gore. I like it, I think, except it would leave me one short for this week. Hoping to snag E. Parker off WW for J. Stevens. What do you think? Another counter? Leave post Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gatorclan3 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Take it and RUN!!! Gore is a HUGE upgrade over Jordan. Wayne has to fight with Harrison for TD's and Galloway has no one to compete with. DO IT Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ramblin'wreck 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Take it. As an owner of Jordan, I am desparate to move him. If I can get Gore in return, I would jump in a heartbeat. Here's mine.. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=245029 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
djrockstar 0 Posted October 18, 2006 This is tricky. I don't think the team necessarily makes your team better, just adjusts who you think will have a better rest of the season. The math looks like this to me ... Galloway<Wayne Gore>>Jordan So I think you'd have the slight edge there. My only issues are 1) Are we sure Gore is durable for an entire season? and 2) Now that Fargas is injured can we expect a little more from Jordan? Thanks for answering mine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mgm32 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Take it ASAP. See mine http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=245134 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ingsoc747 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Good transaction, I would try it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
swgalaxy 0 Posted October 18, 2006 sounds like a good deal...watch for the fumbles with gore My Webpage Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Candygram4Mongo 8 Posted October 18, 2006 It means a downgrade at WR for you, but you have some depth there. Huge step up at RB for you, filling a need. Do it. see mine http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=245165 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ruptured groin 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Thanks for mine... This seems like a good deal. you need the upgrade at RB and I think Galloway will have a better second half than first. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bryce_paradyce 0 Posted October 18, 2006 I like it, as long as you will be comfortable with your starting WRs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mcstl25 0 Posted October 18, 2006 I like it, as long as you will be comfortable with your starting WRs. Jordan is a mess, get rid of him while you can! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Super Monster Raiders 0 Posted October 18, 2006 I like jordan and wayne, both still young and play to win... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mambokings 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Wayne is a stud, and Jordan has a nice schedule late in the season. When Aaron Brooks returns Jordan will be even better. I'd hold tight, keeping the superior WR and waiting it out on Lamont as he can only get better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
philssteelers200 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Still not completely convinced, especially after the last two posts. Gore does have injury concerns. Does it make any difference it's a keeper league, we will keep up to four players for next year. (First year of the keeper league, likely increase to six or eight in the next couple of years) Thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
