Gore, Huard and Colston for Bledsoe, Mason and Henry

[T Man 0]

I have been offered

 

Gore, Colston and Huard

 

for

 

Henry, Mason and Bledsoe

 

 

Should I do it or stand pat?

[nosferatu9368 0]

I Would do it you already have Palmer and you are getting the better of the RB and WR.

 

Good Luck

 

Thanks for answering mine...

 

Peace...

[bgard72 10]

I would do that trade. Colston will continue to produce...and if you're in the Yahoo league, you get him at WR or TE. Gore will be solid as well.

 

Thanks for answering mine!

[OTCM 0]

I'm not as interested. T. Henry has played outstandingly and looks fresh. Gore is playing on a very uneven offense. SF has a slightly more favorable rushing schedule the rest of the way, though, so that probably balances things out. All in all, a pretty even trade. Go with your gut.

[Amen G-men 0]

I think it is a decent trade and I agree, if you are in a yahoo league, COlston

s flexibility may pay off. Thanks for answering mine!

[pook187 0]

I'd do it. Colston and Gore are young, but talented. You're not losing much with Bledsoe, who may get the hook before too long.

 

Good luck.

[UCFdog09 0]

Good trade, Colston can be lined up at TE. and Gore is a solid back. the only person ur losing worth mentioning is Henry, hes losing 2 solid fantasy players.

[bobpate17 0]

I would do it. you are not loosing much at qb but u r gaining much at RB and WR. I love coston since I can start him as TE.

 

please see mine.

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=245534

[rgn22 1]

I'd make that trade. You have Palmer so you don't need Bledsoe. Huard has been putting up good numbers, and Gore is only going to get better. Colston has been great and is definitely better than Mason.

 

 

I have been offered

 

Gore, Colston and Huard

 

for

 

Henry, Mason and Bledsoe

Should I do it or stand pat?