SharkysMachine 0 Posted October 26, 2006 I'm in a performance scoring league and I need a QB just like all the other Bledsoe owners out there... Here's my situation: Current QB's are Bledsoe, McNair, and Seneca Wallace; Current RB's are Fast Willie Parker, Tatum Bell, Travis Henry, and Shaun Alexander. We start 2 RB's (no flex). I have been offered Michael Vick for Bell or either Grossman or Kitna for Parker.....Which deal would you make? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aggro10 0 Posted October 26, 2006 still not completley sold on Bell, as a former Den RB owner I have learned that Shanny will play whoever you bench and vice-versa. I'd jump all over Vick trade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chitown81 0 Posted October 26, 2006 go for vick. so far grossman's been the best of those, but as the weather gets nasty in chicago, they'll be forced to start running more. thanks for mine Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Young_Grasshopper 0 Posted October 26, 2006 Kitna and Grossman are overrated at this point; I don't trust either one to be worth a starting RB. I'm tempted by the Vick for Bell... yeah, I'd do that. You'll have SA back in time for the playoffs. Thanks for answering mine! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pmccurry 0 Posted October 26, 2006 id consider the vick trade barring that there are no qbs left on the wire and that you wouldnt be able to find a better deal from another owner. have you looked at carson palmer? his stock is pretty low at this point and i think he'll do a little better now that chris henry and chris perry will be on the field. vick's stock, at this point is higher than it will be all season because of his recent aberation with his passing game. thanks for your input on my topic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Triumph 0 Posted October 26, 2006 I say go for Vick. The way he played last week was not a fluke. He asked for that game plan and showed his boss that he is a good pocket passer that is mobil. If he stays healthy your golden. I think Bell will eventually blow it and you will make out better in the long run. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
schlieffen 0 Posted October 26, 2006 I'm in a similar position (see my post) and in your case I'd probably take Vick for Bell (just as I am leaning towards Vick for Henry). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
siorestech 0 Posted October 26, 2006 Out of those three offers I think Vick for Bell is the best. I wouldn't trust Grossman or Kitna, they're overrated. I'd rather have Parker than Bell and you have Alexander coming back soon. Thank for your help. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nosferatu9368 0 Posted October 26, 2006 I wouldn't make any of those trades, I do not like trading a QB for a RB unless it was Peyton, McNabb or Bulger. Everyone is high on Vick now because of the huge game vs Pittsburgh. IMO he will go back to his old ways of 180 passing yards 1 td and 60 rushing yards. That is not worth giving up a starting RB. If you are gonna trade Bell get better than Vick like Palmer or Eli. Is there nobody available on the WW? I guess I just think your giving away to much for a player who dont score on a regular basis. If you want Vick that bad offer Henry not Bell. Good Luck Peace... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites