ric0 23 Posted September 26, 2008 Standard scoring. Start 2RB, 2WR, 1Flex (RB/WR) Here's the trade: Mine: M. Turner (ATL RB), B. Edwards (CLE WR), E. Graham (TB RB) Rest of team: SJax , L White, Fargas, D Sproles, S Morris, S Holmes, DBowe, A Bryant His: S. Smith (CAR WR), B. Jacobs (NYG RB), E. Royal (DEN WR) Rest of team: TJones, S Young, R Mendenhall, LJ, T.O., W Welker, L Evans, D Stallworth, B Engram Kept Braylon Edwards in my dynasty league but have been disappointed with his performance. Been pretty surprised at Turner's production but arguably has faced his two easiest opponents. Lendale is questionable this week, Fargas is out for the next couple of weeks too. What are you thoughts on this trade? Leave a link. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bill belichik's hoody 0 Posted September 26, 2008 I think you should get a lot more out of Turner, Graham, and Edwards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
celloshane 0 Posted September 26, 2008 I like the trade, except that it's going to leave you extremely light on RB depth for a while. Half your bench is useless right now and Turner's the only guy who's not in a time share (or crippled by his team like SJax). Did you plan to start SJax and Jacobs? I'd think long and hard about where this trade leaves you at RB before you pull the trigger. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=326229 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Michael123 0 Posted September 26, 2008 I wouldn't do it. Don't see how it makes you better. Thanks for mine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
We Tigers 71 Posted September 26, 2008 This is a tough package to pitch, because you want to sell high on Turner but aren't getting much value for Edwards, given how lousy he's been. I would wait and see what happens Sunday. If Edwards has a great day, you'll get a lot more for him. And if you really want to get something out of Turner from this guy, I'd pitch Turner to him for Smith or TO straight-up. Sell high like whoa. The big problem with the trade is that I don't think it meets your need. You're trading away two good RBs and getting back one RB somewhere in the middle of them, which doesn't help with Lendale and Fargas' injuries. You get Steve Smith, but with Holmes and Bowe, you already have decent depth at WR. I think there are too many variables for it to really be a sure thing trade. Check mine? Updated at the bottom... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
only a guess 0 Posted September 26, 2008 Agree with the others ... the pts are about the same. The trouble is that if in doubt, RBs are worth more than WRs, and you are giving up more RBs. Also by doing this, your opponent's roster gets better than yours. here is mine ... http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=326238 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tronix7787 0 Posted September 27, 2008 I wouldn't do it, I agree with the others, it leaves you weaker at RB. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pit fan 0 Posted September 27, 2008 Thanks for mine. Stay where you are at Share this post Link to post Share on other sites