Lamb of God 15 Posted November 18, 2012 4pt passing 6pt rushing non keeper 1pt ppr league my team is in my sig. Trade 1: I give Romo/Ridley for Brady- His RBs are AP, Gore, McGahee with Brady and Dalton at qb Trade 2: I give Ridley for his Luck straight up. His rbs are D Murray, and ALf morris basically and his other qb is Stafford and hes already inquired about this trade. Well Lucks schedule down the stretch is better and in either trade I give up ridley so Romo especially if he has a decent game this week may entice the other guy but I guess it comes down to Brady vs Luck down the stretch. In our ppr we can go 3wr 1rb so having CJ and the plethora of wr's I have I can prob survive losing ridley especially with his tough scheduel down the stretch. Thoughts and leave a link Promise I get back Im not one of those guys. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KingPrawn 4 Posted November 18, 2012 4pt passing 6pt rushing non keeper 1pt ppr league my team is in my sig. Trade 1: I give Romo/Ridley for Brady- His RBs are AP, Gore, McGahee with Brady and Dalton at qb Trade 2: I give Ridley for his Luck straight up. His rbs are D Murray, and ALf morris basically and his other qb is Stafford and hes already inquired about this trade. Well Lucks schedule down the stretch is better and in either trade I give up ridley so Romo especially if he has a decent game this week may entice the other guy but I guess it comes down to Brady vs Luck down the stretch. In our ppr we can go 3wr 1rb so having CJ and the plethora of wr's I have I can prob survive losing ridley especially with his tough scheduel down the stretch. Thoughts and leave a link Promise I get back Im not one of those guys. I'm not sure why the 1st guy would go for that trade. Doubtful he'd start Ridley over Peterson or Gore or even McGahee. But if you can pull it off, go for this one. Second one sounds more do-able. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MikeK 8 Posted November 18, 2012 I'm not sure why the 1st guy would go for that trade. Doubtful he'd start Ridley over Peterson or Gore or even McGahee. But if you can pull it off, go for this one. Second one sounds more do-able. Agree - if you're looking to make an easy trade, go with #2. More realistic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rome24/7 0 Posted November 18, 2012 Yea i'd take number 2 also Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lamb of God 15 Posted November 18, 2012 20 views and 3 posts awesome !!!! Its not that hard to give an opinion Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SteveClay 0 Posted November 18, 2012 If that second offer is already good to go just go ahead and do it. If you are playoff bound, Luck has a pretty good schedule. He plays against 2 bad pass D's (KC and TEN), but also has to play HOU in between..... If that deal for Brady can happen though, make it happen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bingobuckchops 0 Posted November 18, 2012 No doubt I'd do the first one if it's still on the table. The difference between Romo and Brady is huge, and Ridley's sked on the way out is tough sledding. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steppdaddy 0 Posted November 18, 2012 If you can pull off the first trade I would do it. I don't like your second trade at all. Luck is not going to be that much better than Romo and you are losing a starting r.b. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
