Voltaire

Q1) Some identify as men. The majority of those that do have a cawk, balls, and traceable detections of testosterone. Q2) Fat, ugly 300 pound women with blue hair, fat ugly 300 pound men with blue hair who dress like women, and a theocracy of billionaire perverts led by a fat, ugly 300 pound person with a cawk, balls, and traceable detection of testosterone named George Soros.

The demise of his graft and corruption is something that normal people celebrate. Just like we celebrate kids who overcome cancer or preventing drag queens from groping little kids. Those of us who aren't soulless, depraved automatons see things different. Maybe you could help Hunter out by buying one of his paintings. You could also consider adopting some of Biden's transgender mice, think of the great many hours or joy you could have playing with them in those cute little latex costumes.

Wordle 1,356 2/6 🟨🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 I'm shocked. I mean it was what I'd hoped would happen when I picked this word, but didn't expect it to work.

I'd be happy to welcome Alberta, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan but BC is a leftoid sh*thole and they can keep it.

Why would we? They regularly get released whenever he says it. The goal is the release of hostages, not making them pay hell.

Look at all those Democrats saluting like Nazis: https://images.axios.com/-gzb-S8nYaUSgJPr5_XE1Ru3qY8=/0x198:4000x2448/1920x1080/2025/03/05/1741215553911.jpg?w=1920

We've watched SotU addresses all our lives. Mike Johnson was no Biden fan but but being seated behind him, he stood and applauded a number of times during the last couple SotU addresses. Ditto Pelosi for Trump.

It starts with "to change their minds." Your first time on the internet, you arrive with good intentions thinking, "This is all obvious and common sense. I can explain it so everyone will understand." Then after a short period of time, when you don't make any progress, you realize these people either hate or don't give a fock about the country, nor the people in it; They like sick and perverted things. Marxism makes sense, cops are racist, criminals are misunderstood, the founding fathers were self interested slave owners, skin color is an obsession, drag queens rubbing their crotch in children's face are normal, carving up children's' sex organs is fine but opposing it isn't, illegal immigration is beneficial, and its hilarious to make fun of kids with cancer So then it devolves into 'to annoy them' and 'bored and waste time.'

They're not going to find enough money to save to offset the tax cuts they want to do as well as balance the budget because Trump has placed so many popular programs off limits. The GOP is going to infight and the Dems aren't going to help them. Something is going to give (and we've seen this movie played dozens of time before, it'll be the same thing that always gives when there is a budget dispute.)

This is Carville's advice. Seems solid. Trump has sought out the 80% position on tons of 80/20 issues across the spectrum and the Dems' kneejerk response is to fight him at every turn and thereby rope themselves into deeply unpopular 20% positions. I don't know if they're taking that advice. Every single Democrats held together to filibuster a bill trying to end the trannies domination of women's sports. Alright, wear that. Even their own voters support the focking ban. They could have taken the sensible position and allow this issue to go away. Instead Republicans will have something to talk about each election going forward until they smarten up. How about allowing sh*t to happen like saving money, securing the border, energy independence, and trannies blocked from womens' sports and locker rooms. People have short attention spans. They can come back in 2026 talking about things that aren't absurd.

There are a lot of veterans with nothing wrong with them that claim 50% disabilities, but I don't want to open that can of worms because that guy and that one over there are legit and deserve every penny.

Yeah. I sure don't have a problem with them cutting every other agency. Seeing them come round to the one I actually use, eh, but I'm not going to be a hypocrite. I know that the objective is to save money by cutting bloat, not reducing services.

Zelinsky also put his #1 political opponent in jail but that's forgivable considering that Biden tried to do the same thing.

Now that I think about it, add FDR, LBJ, George W, Obama, and Trump himself to the list to the list. Somehow in the US, we've always been able to pull off a war and an election simultaneously.

Abraham Lincoln must have been a fool for sucking it up and doing it anyways.

We know that they are going through the federal government looking to find places to cut costs and lay off workers. The VA isn't exactly a place that I like to see cuts, considering that I use the VA. First, we'll check the veracity of the internal memo, then, if true, we'll see how deeply it affects services. The AP got the scoop as they are the only one reporting this, but they are a reliable source so far as the MSM goes.

#3 was the only completely reasonable part. With #2, I can't fault President Trump for trying to get back some of the money we spent over there, but I'd always written it off as a loss/unrecoverable until he started talking about this a month ago. #5 is the unfortunate sh*t that happens when you lose a war. #1 and #4 though, those two are total bullsh*t.

This is awful (if accurate). I'll wait for the details first.

You were one of the main apologists telling us both Biden and Trump were in decline. Which isn't true. Trump has tons of energy. Trump regularly hosts Oval Office interviews with a hostile press corps, can speak off the cuff on topics, does two dozen things simultaneously, and if you pull up an interview from the 80s, 90s hasn't demonstrated any noticeable decline. Meanwhile, Biden can't complete a thought, needs handholding to prevent wandering off, and was/is little more than a houseplant.

The political animosity on both sides is turned up to eleven. And to think that at the time, we thought the Gingrich/Clinton battles and their government shutdowns were acrimonious.

His problem is that he has independent views and won't always stay on the plantation. Also, anyone who - on the record - takes views to the right of Joy Behar is a Nazi.

Thanks. That's interesting. Seeing the tranny takeover of everything and their subsequent removal would have been solid. Too bad the Russia/Ukraine war looks to be winding down with nuclear Armageddon seemingly inconceivable at this late point. I hate it when Rusty wins an argument with somebody. ---- I should make my own. I'd include stuff like enhanced people with chip implants in their brain, people defeating death and living forever as brains in a glass jar, living to be 250 but not collecting Social Security as that goes bankrupt, and the NBA (and other sports leagues) dissolving because of all the Michael Jordan and Wilt Chamberlain clones.

This is a good thread to bump. Glad I saw it. To be clear, last year Biden was operating under the exact same immigration laws that Trump is operating under now. The only difference is they issued different executive orders to get the different results they desired. Compare and contrast the results for yourself. Also, please remember how Biden left the border open for three years, and reflect on why he wanted this bill to pass in order to do something rather than just take the initiative himself to do something as President Trump has done. It seems to me that Trump has proven that this border bill was unnecessary. If Biden had been serious about securing the border, he could have simply taken the actions that President Trump is taking now. The truth, it would seem is that Biden wanted unfettered, open immigration but saw that it was both politically unpopular and came with too many unintended consequences that he hadn't considered. Rather than take action, he wanted to rope enough Republicans into a bipartisan border bill so a change in policy popular with the Democratic base could be blamed on them. Anyway, hindsight is 20/20. Can we agree that Biden could have stopped the flow of illegal migrants anytime he wanted to but made the deliberate chose not to? Or is the argument that Biden wanted to control the border but was just incompetent? or something else?

There are some around. I'm thinking specifically of Bill Maher who remains a circa 2010 liberal that hasn't changed but instead laments that the rest of his party all boarded the train to loony-left coo-coo for CoCo Puffs land. He really is the best the Democrats have to offer, hopefully they don't listen to him.

Hopefully we see Kamala or some other loopy establishment/nutjob amalgamated idiot, but a swing state governor like Halfwit or Shapiro would be more formidable. I hope there's an unhinged Marxist gender-nonconforming BIPOC police-defunder they can rally around.