Voltaire

Suburban Auto Group realizes that sometimes suburban people find it necessary to enter their nearby crime-ridden urban sh*thole. I'm glad you acknowledge that Trump has a responsibility to attempt to fix the the problem you created though. Its better than most of your kind.

Mamdani voters have already removed the Theodore Roosevelt statue from the Museum of Natural History, so I imagine we'll be seeing a lot more of this. I hope the Statue of Liberty is on federal land rather than NYC land because they're liable to do to that what they did to the George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, and Oregon Trail Pioneer statues during George Floyd's Summer of Love. While that is happening, the NYTimes will praise it and Cuomo voters will stand in the background and clap politely again, like the good well-trained liberals they are. They don't need such a brazen symbol of white supremacy, white settler colonialism, and capitalist exploitation polluting their skyline after all.

Republicans and people who care about New York should vote for Curtis Sliwa because he's by far the best candidate. For those of us that couldn't care less about the city since we can choose not to live or go there, we already have three solid reasons to want to see Mamdani beat Cuomo. First both New York Cuomo voters and Mamdani voters will be getting exactly what they deserve with a Mamdani win. Second, we realize that in the parts of the country where voters aren't retarded, Republicans has has a better chance of beating Democrats when Democrats run a Joker faction candidate rather than one from their far more formidable Penguin faction. Third, Mamdani leading New York will be hilarious, it will be 100% somebody else's problem, and it will serve as a huge blinking neon light example for this generation that whenever a community elects far left Democrats the same thing that to that community is what happens to a human body that subside on cheezy poofs, hohos, fentanyl, cigarettes, and malt liquor. Oh, and Mamdani's dad locking up the leftoid freak professor is also a plus. More reason to want to see Cuomo lose. We'll generously call this reason four. The one downside to a Mamdani win is it may make Cuono voters leave and spread their votes/cancer/poison to healthy communities. We'll gladly take the Daniel Pennys and Sliwa voting refugees of New York but the rest of youze guys can stay the fock home.

I'm halfway through that link and scrolled for 2-3 minutes, didn't see Lea Smith's name once so I bailed. You might have done me a solid by telling me the event. Anyone else attempting to find him, I'd recommend working your way up from the bottom. No matter though, Lea is still competing against women and hanging around in their locker room, when Lea should be on the men's team.

(Sorry in advance for the diversion, thhis is a Gaza thread I'll follow up in a different one) All right, fair enough. Intersex people (people born with both sex organs or or alternatively people born with underdeveloped sex organs) do exist and some live lives as men, some as women. I respect their dignity and their right to choose to be treated as such. So, intersex aside, my position is that people with only functional male organs are always and forever men and people with only functional female organs are always and forever female. That mental health and other healthcare professionals should first and foremost encourage them to find peace, happiness and contentment with the body they have and prescribe diet or exercise. If people go a step beyond this and exhibit a desire to dress and live life presenting as a person of the opposite gender, they are free to do so. Expecting other people to affirm, see, or treat them as a member of that other gender is an individual choice. Society at large should restrict them to only have access to sex specific areas such as bathrooms, locker rooms, and sports leagues to the gender they were born into. A final decision to mutilate their sex organs and receive cross-gender hormones should only occur in adults who desire it and should be privately financed, explicitly excluding any subsidizing by taxpayer money. If and where do you agree or disagree with that?

The way forward is, and should always have been, to treat everyone equally as individuals based on their own character and not on their skin color. The opportunity is there, take it. If/when the opportunity is not there... yes, that is our collective civic responsibility to fix.

They think some men have ovaries, some don't and both are natural.

While the Jim Crow situation set them back for generations, it has not only been non-existed for the entire lifetimes of anyone under 60, but was instead replaced for the last 60 years with racial preferences. Rising from a lower starting point is only one factor. The breakdown of the traditional families specifically absentee fatherhood, lack of quality adult community role models, low quality schools, the high crime rates, prevalence of substance abuse, glamorization of crime and lower priority of education in culture all play a part as well. The reason African and black Caribbean immigrants excel rather than suffer from the same levels of malfeasance that our domestic black population encounters should prove to you that ongoing (anti-black) racial discrimination is no longer an inhibiting factor. Outcomes vary... Nigerian and Ghanan immigrants tend to do exceedingly well, while Somalis seem to have brought the rampant corruption and scamming with them from their failed culture.

Someone who selfishly chooses to ruin women's sports is not someone I have much sympathy for, but I would never wish death on anyone nor speak ill of them after they pass tragically. I do wish he and others like him would have had the decency to leave women alone but I also wish these people have quality mental health care to prevent suicide, find happiness and joy in their life while respecting women's private spaces, and to go on peaceably living his life as either a man or woman.

The facts I just posted are themselves presented showing that whites make up the majority of SNAP recipients. Whites are at 35%, significantly more that the second and third largest racial group. If this is the point that you are making, I think everyone here agrees.

This has been his position all along. Only delusional retards ever thought otherwise.

I don't think anyone disagrees with your claim about white people getting more SNAP benefits because everyone realizes white people are the largest ethnic group in the country. Maybe the disagreement is around if they get more or less per capita than other groups, in which case I it seems self evident that they get less. I typed this into Google AI : what is the racial makeup of SNAP beneficiary recipients and contrast this with the racial makeup of the country as a whole. and this is the result I got: ------ While a plurality of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients are White, racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionately represented compared to their share of the U.S. population. This disparity reflects broader inequities in poverty and food insecurity across the country. Racial makeup of SNAP recipients According to the latest USDA data from fiscal year 2023, the breakdown of SNAP recipients is: White: Over 35% of participants Black/African American: Nearly 26% of participants Hispanic: Nearly 16% of participants Asian: 4% of participants Native American: Over 1% of participants It is worth noting that a significant share of SNAP participants, about 17%, are categorized as "race unknown". Racial makeup of the U.S. population In contrast, here is the racial makeup of the total U.S. population, based on 2023 estimates: White (non-Hispanic): 58% of the population Hispanic: 20% of the population Black/African American: 13% of the population Asian: 6% of the population Other/Multiracial: 3% of the population Key contrasts and disparities Comparing the two breakdowns highlights clear disparities in the representation of different racial and ethnic groups on SNAP. Black Americans are significantly overrepresented. They make up almost 26% of SNAP recipients, which is about double their 13% share of the U.S. population. Hispanic Americans are also overrepresented. They constitute nearly 16% of SNAP recipients, a figure notably higher than their 13% share of the adult population in 2020 (when using Census data). White Americans are underrepresented. While they account for the largest share of total SNAP beneficiaries, their participation rate is lower than their share of the overall U.S. population. Asian Americans have a proportional or slightly lower representation. Their share of SNAP participation is generally in line with or slightly lower than their share of the total population, according to some analyses. These disparities are tied to larger socioeconomic factors. In 2021, food insecurity rates for Black and Hispanic households were more than double the rate for White households, and these inequities reflect structural barriers related to systemic racism, discrimination, and poverty.

thegeneral and I agreed to the $1000 to $100 bet. If he wins, I will donate $1000 to the homeless and/or animal shelter charity of his choice. If I win, I will put the $100 to taking my family out to dinner. It's also expanded not just to Trump running again, but it also includes Trump making way and leaving office with a new president getting inaugurated in January 2029.

There is no chance whatsover. Look, I can come up with $1000 if you put up the $100.

It is free money, but the problem here is that If I accepted this bet, I'd do so by entering it in bad faith since I would not be able to cover it.

I'll do it for $100 to $2 or $1000 to $100 edit nevermind fock off

I'm three years removed from the Chinese government destroying everything I worked for all my life and so I couldn't pay you if I lost in order to to gain a couple of family nights out to eat and also I don't know that I could trust you to pay up anyway.

Nevermind. I presumed it was a typo.

50:1 So I win $2?

You're offering to bet on this? Yeah, I'll take that up.

Maybe Cards deserve better, their division is hell.

No. We all KNOW he isn't. There is a 0.0000000000000000000000% chance he is running (rounded up). it's because its illegal. Those of us paying attention know that Trump never, not one time, has ever crossed a court decision. We do see that je pushed the limits, he maliciously complies, he appeals, but in the end, if they slap him down, he always always follows the courts. That's why Uganda Eswatini Liberia Dad hasn't been deported yet and why the border wall funding/construction was held up for as long as it was. Running for a third term is such a clear violation of the Constitution that it not even worth thinking about. You guys are absurd. This whole thing is an artificial leftoid generated nightmare that only exists because they all live in an information silo where they smell each others farts all day. The reason Trump plays along with it is because trolling them and watching them hyperventilate humors him. I do believe that he would run if the Constitution allowed it. He likes the job, he likes the challenge, he likes the battles, and he wants to shepherd his reforms through to the end.

The rankings go from who is most likely to put a beatdown on your ass, to which team is least likely to pull out a win. For me it's not, "whose got a chance to be there at the end." Indy with their incredibly soft schedule wins that competition in a heartbeat, meaning the AFC bye and #1 seed looks likely to go there. For me, I am just waiting for them to prove it against somebody worth a d@mn. San Diego is good and maybe Denver but not really. If Indy can beat KC I'll show more love, but they don't exactly have many opportunities to play against good teams this year. SF would have been a challenge... alas...

Of the top twelve, the Broncos 6-2 record is to me the most fake and is the team most likely to collapse (maybe New England). They are 1-2 against top teams which includes coming from out of nowhere to beat Philly, but otherwise have beat some really bad teams. In the LAC game, LA got 29 first downs that day, Denver 9, and the Chargers outgained the Broncos 376-265. Meanwhile both New York teams could have put them away but credit Denver, they did not allow it to happen.

You're right, I don't understand in the slightest. Well to congrats Chuck then. What victory he accomplished with this pwnage?