skinny43

Im going with Yeldon and Abdullah... I was on the fence between Abdullah or Woodhead, but Im Im going with AAs upside over Woodhead's matchup. thx for the help guys

I dont understand what youre getting and what your giving in this trade.... please clarify

Lacy/Miller > Hill/Stewart

I would accept that trade.......

I need to pick 2 of these 4 RBs for my RB2 and flex... which 2 do I go with? standard ppr scoring Danny Woodhead Ameer Abdullah TJ Yeldon Shane Vereen

its a half point per reception scoring... Im in a few leagues... so Im used to lots of different formats (this is the only 10 teamer Im in.. the other three are 12 teamers) I enjoy the challenge of mining the waiver wire to find a Andre Holmes, or Brian Hartline to plug in for a bye week and hope to strike gold with a favorable matchup.... but Im not really down with having to rely on guys like them every week to fill a second flex slot

would you be in a 2 flex league again? and at what point do you tip the balance or ratio of viable starters and ruin your league?

Ive been in 2 QB leagues... and hated it.... in addition, noone in this league wants any part of a 2 QB league

I know... this league already starts 3WRs and a flex... and they want to add another flex... they justify it by saying 'theres one less bench spot, so the WW talent pool isnt any different/thinner. I think its going to be a disaster... but Im having difficulty making the case to the league as to why.

the league has been together for 15 years now and all members are experienced FFers

some members of my 10 team keeper league want to add a second flex position... Im trying to sort thru whether this is a good idea and need some unbiased help from the FFToday boards... our current roster is as follows: 18 roster spots... we currently start a QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 flex, 1 TE, 1D 1 K.... with 8 bench slots... 1 keeper two members have suggested the following change: 18 roster spots... 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 2 flex, 1 TE, 1 D, 1 K.... with 7 bench slots... 1 keeper I am reluctant to go along with adding a second flex... with week 9 having 6 teams on a bye, and having to start a combination of 7 rb/wrs every week... it would seem that there arent enough players to make this viable... 7 players x 10 teams, makes 70 players needed to start every week... (plus the roughly 60+ additional players on teams bench) are there enough players to even go around without thinning out the talent pool to obscurity? my gut tells me this is a bad idea, but Im having a hard time making the case against it in my league... what are your thoughts? please help

mularky is the problem. his gagetry will ruin Ronnie like he ruined Willis last year... beware.

four words: Mike Mularky, Offensive Coordinator.

wrong again... Id get way more leverage stepping into the punch than you ever could.

Im still not sure what or how you think you'll 'control the draft' by going rb/wr... most every mock Ive seen has the 11 & 12 spots going rb/wr... oh and... word.