Mike Honcho

Lawfare.

You sure are up on your Pride month news.

fixed

Melania has rights!

Rock on Torrid!

National Average: 4.4 Wordle 1,081 4/6 🟩🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Framed #816 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥 https://framed.wtf

I agree with you, and that's exactly how I would argue it if I were the prosecution. But there are some unusual circumstances here, like why can't a state charge him if he's in the White House, COVID time extensions, just seems to be enough to muddy the waters. It would still be a massive long shot and pretty unprecedented for SCOTUS to be telling a state how they must interpret the rules of when a crime is time barred. *As an aside, I find it strange that we have time limits on when crimes can be prosecuted. But that's an entirely different thread.

I wonder if he'll join the J6 a capella group?

I'm sure they will appeal everything that crosses their mind, but I like the statute of limitations issue the most, for what it's worth. It's a misdemeanor to falsify business records, and the statute of limitations on that is 2 years. He was writing the checks until 2017, so 2019. The he was in the White House and Covid extensions might still not be enough to be able to bring charges. Now the felony version of that law is 5 years, but you can't elevate it to felony without the misdemeanor---it's the kind of technicality that SCOTUS loves, get to toss the case without getting their hands dirty. Anyway, that would be my play.

From what I have read, I don't think it's even an appealable issue.

But at least one Immigrant Song.

No, but his supporters will be...

Note to self, don't play BufordT in pool. Also, I know what movie I'm going to watch tonight.

I think he's going to send Doc Brown and Marty McFly back in time to uninvent the ladder.

You look like you are having a blast.

I'll stain your bare wood Peenie.

Teaching business ethics to kids.

The American Flag!!!

Opinion piece, but describes the mechanism for her removal. It’s an uphill battle because the law on reassigning judges is tough. The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (which covers Florida) has deemed reassignment appropriate “where the trial judge has engaged in conduct that gives rise to the appearance of impropriety or a lack of impartiality in the mind of a reasonable member of the public.” On its face, one might think from that language that Cannon shouldn’t be on the case. But she is on it — and might stay on it — because it’s not that simple.

You are correct, he's not the only one... most of you righties have an overdeveloped sense of victimhood too.

Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling saved jazz.

His letter doesn't doesn't match the actual facts though/and there is a police report about the argument that proves this. Story - in case you don't have The Times

I'm still of the opinion she will not be the one to try this case.