Nomad99

You want laws that are effective? Try this......MANDATORY 5 YEAR SENTANCE FOR FELON FOUND WITH FIREARM.....NO PAROLE. MANDATORY 10 YEAR SENTANCE FOR COMMITTING A CRIME WITH A FIREARM.....NO PAROLE....20 YEARS 2ND OFFENSE. MANDATORY LIFE SENTANCE FOR COMMITTING A CRIME WITH FIREARM RESULTING IN DEATH.....NO PAROLE. MANDATORY DEATH SENTANCE FOR 1ST DEGREE MURDER WITH FIREARM. But no......that's cruel & unusual punishment.

Dak

Absolutely not!!!!!

The only game screwing up my parley

You aren't a vegetarian are you?

If you want to enact laws that HAVE A REAL, MEASURABLE AFFECT ON BAD GUYS, without handicapping lawful citizens.....I'm all aboard & have your back.

Give me a Spas with a drum mag any day.....

If the Dems had convinced RBG to retire, instead of selfishly hanging on like a dinosaur.....they could of had it their way.

AR 10 is 7.62 vs 5.56

Jones....he's the pass catching back & should be seeing more use.

Yeah......because the people that want to use guns for nefarious purposes are going to aquire them legally, register them & submit to a background check.

But when trouble strikes, you are going to call for a guy with a badge.......and a gun.

Imagine that......

YOU talked about certain people sidestepping the "efficiency" of certain guns.......I just attempted to point out the relevance of that "efficiency" pertaining to the 2nd.

You talked about sidestepping the efficiency of certain guns.....those guns, although similar, are not as efficient as what the military has. The INTENT of the 2nd amendment is only debated by those without the intellectual capacity to understand what our Forefathers strived to accomplish. THEY.....wanted the Citizens to have the means to rise up against a government turned tyrannical....to stand up to ANY threat, foreign OR domestic. Do you think they intended for the citizens to accomplish that with much inferior weapons? In order adhere to their INTENT, WE THE PEOPLE need to have as much parity as reasonable. AND before anyone starts spouting off that our Forefathers didn't have the acumen to forsee the future changing as far as technology......Benjamin Franklin foresaw dropping troops behind enemy lines by way of aerial devices

That's the template assumption of those that don't know what they are talking about......

Thanks for demonstrating a lack of understanding of the full INTENT of the 2nd amendment. THOSE THAT DON'T UNDERSTAND SHOULD PROBABLY ALSO BE CROSSED OFF THE LISTOF PEOPLE WANTING TO HAVE A SERIOUS DISCUSSION.

It's now or never. I picked up Spears on a Longshot hope that Henry gets traded.

Look to aquire Achane or Kyren Williams.

No, it isn't. Look up the numbers.....its been proven that it's not the case.

I think either is a good choice this week. If I wasn't starting Higgins and Boyd, I may have gone with SF.

Douglas is a gem.

I'm sitting SF & playing Seattle

Nice job being completely clueless as to the intent of the 2nd amendment. Recent world events have validated that intent.

And the reason liberals are are against it is is to compromise the integrity of the process.