GutterBoy

Jalen hurts has 3 more yards this season than Josh Dobbs, less yards than Jordan Love and jimmy Garapolo, a lower qbr than sam Howell, and he makes $11M more than Jones, 4th highest paid player in the league

Yeah I'm short, and you're a disgusting creeper, congrats.

Why are guys so focking creepy. Smh.

It's a game

Respectable first qtr

Wtf does that mean?

Alternate spread

FanDuel has a no sweat parlay Went with giants +14.5, under 44.5, Waller o47.5, purdy under 223.5. Giants might be able to keep it close and niners just play slow and take the easy win.

Alcohol, tribalism, toxic masculinity, a deadly combination. That poor kid that watched it all happen. Don't be a douche bag. Don't be stupid.

Teams ARE allowed to hire who they want, Rooney rule doesn't stop them.

No Saquon, No Thomas, a defense that hasn't shown up yet. My plan is to drink heavily and hope that we don't get embarrassed or sustain more injuries.

I don't know why but I actually listened to this. He's such a douche. His overall sentiment is "Why are you being so mean to me WAAAAAAH" First he says she called him racist, then he reads the email and there is no mention of racist. She also says she doesn't remember everything that was written, and she asks to hear it, and then she remembers and owns up to it. Later Dave lies and says that she claimed she never said anything negative about it, but she never said that either. He doesn't know how to pronounce misogynistic which is crazy since he's been called misogynistic every day of his adult life. He clearly only cares about his image and what the reporter thinks about him, what a douche. Then he also says all the advertisers love him, so then why get so upset that she's sharing his history with said advertisers? Also he clearly does have a history of misogyny. https://www.mediamatters.org/barstool-sports/barstool-sports-cesspool-misogyny-and-bigotry

If attacking the weak is wrong then why do you keep coming after me and calling me weak?

Well according to jonmx he's a bastion of free speech trying to take down the american fascists.

OK, so you're telling me that the Welfare Reform Act of 1996 was liberal policy? Because Clinton (a liberal) signed it? And it wasn't part of Newt Gingrich's Contract with America? The Republican led initiative? And the 104th Congress that passed the law, only after surviving 2 Clinton Vetos, this Congress that was run by Republicans, was somehow part of the DNC? And only half of the Democrats in congress voted for it, and many were outraged at Clinton for voting for it, but still, it was led by Democrats. Democrats wanted less govt handouts? Democrats wanted less people on Welfare? You're really tell me this?

Deep State! Russell Brand isn't even American!

Yes, Democrats have long pushed for more govt assistance and welfare, and Republicans have opposed. That's how we got welfare with restrictions, like "Man in House", which was a concession to republicans for allowing some sort of welfare. Don't be a child and say "Well why allow that" because I know you understand politics better than to make such a dumb statement. I know you understand concessions and how partisan politics work. And don't try and say that conservatives want to give more hand out than liberals, no one is buying that either. Also there was a huge welfare reform in the 90s, driven by republicans, that further limited who receives welfare. Not sure if you fully read this article, probably the best one that refutes everything you are saying: https://newrepublic.com/article/136200/racist-roots-welfare-reform

You're insane! Or a complete ass hole. Your assertion is that liberal policies wanted to create single mother homes in black communities. What I shared with you is multiple conclusions that conservatives didn't want to give welfare to households where there was a able bodied man that couldn't find work. It wasn't about liberals paying women to kick men out of the house, it was conservatives not wanting to give handouts to men that didn't work. Focking idiot

Your "sourcing" are all opinion pieces, and I can provide "sources" that refute those opinions as well. https://www.thechildsupporthustle.com/the-truth-about-black-parents-welfare-and-the-man-in-the-home-requirement/ Alabama is not liberal. But there is an example of the govt saying it's immoral for a woman to be with a man whose not her husband or father to their kids, and we're cutting you off while he comes to your house. So this isn't a liberal trying to enforce a single mother household (for some bizarre reason), it's a conservative saying don't bring a substitute father into the house. https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-1992-05-18-1992139210-story.html https://via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=3106&context=law-review https://newrepublic.com/article/136200/racist-roots-welfare-reform https://www.theroot.com/welfare-fathers-and-those-persistent-myths-1790864434

RLLD was talking about rising incomes, so I thought thats what he was referring to. Reading it back again, I can see how he was talking about govt benefits, so then I was wrong. Still, the govt did not incentivize black women to kick their kids fathers out of the house so they can make some extra scratch. That's asinine.

That Duke Lacrosse b1tch set back sexual assault victims terribly. I think the #METOO movement helped greatly though. I really don't think these victims are politically connected enough to all lie about being assaulted. Sure it's possible they are all paid off by political enemies of Brand, but I highly highly doubt that this is the case. I think you guys are way too engrossed in the political and conspiracy machine where it clouds all your judgement. Read up a little bit on sexual abuse victims, why they don't come forward, what they go through. You'll learn something and hopefully have a different perspective.

I assume you're talking about govt assistance here and not employer wages? You really think the govt wants black fathers out of the home and is encouraging black women to kick them out with financial incentives to do so? holy sh1t this the amount of retarded ass holes in this focking thread.

How does closing the wage gap make things equal? Hmm, I don't know, it's puzzling. Focking retard. If you think the govt increased women's wages so they could kick fathers out the house then you really have no hope of having any intellectual thoughts.

Where did I say black people don't vote? What I said is that black people don't listen to their democratic state senators or whatever and probably can't name them. Can you? I certainly can't. I vote, and I usually vote down the line Republican if I don't know anything about the person, but then forget their name as soon as I walk out of the booth.