GutterBoy

I've known some really good cops over the years, also known some complete douche bags. Question is the percentage of cop douche bags higher than the general population? Based on my experience, I would say yes.

And I don't even have much of a problem with awareness, awareness is fine, but IMO not preferred over actual action. Take Susan Komen Breast Cancer, their biggest thing for years was raising awareness, as opposed to research or aid to patients. Awareness in this case actually helps, as it can and does support early detection and survival rates. Awareness of child trafficking, it's good, essentially nothing wrong with being aware, but does it actually help save kids, not really, unless people that become aware and get involved. But all in all I support awareness. When I didn't know anything about this movie, I applauded it for raising awareness. In today's culture where "All liberals are pedos", it's good to see the topic actually addressed from a factual standpoint. It was only when I learned about the people behind it that I changed my opinion. The facts are lacking, and the people behind the movie support the culture of "all liberals are pedos", and the movie was essentially hijacked to promote this. "Oh you don't want to see the movie? What are you trying to hide? You must be a pedo." So it was more of the same bullsh1t. And then we saw the conspiracy theories, "The theater mysteriously broke", and all the BS. I'm just tired of all this focking fake sh1t that has infiltrated society and brainwashed people.

If that's their genuine cause, sure. How many people are there like that? Probably not many. I would still argue that lining the pockets of people that take advantage of the subject matter is wrong, but people probably don't realize that.

Actually no it's the exact same thing. We've both been critical of people that stopped buying bud light because a tranny held a can. I am being critical of people here that support this movie because it's right wing, you're not. Look, if you enjoy child trafficking movies, then by all means, go see it and enjoy it. If you refuse to because it's right wing, that's dumb. If you're buying other people tickets, streaming it illegally, saying its a crap movie, but still a must see, then it's based on politics, which is wrong. We all know what this movie is about. Whoever was behind the movie, I wouldn't watch it, because it sounds like a rough watch.

Because the guy who wrote the film rails against the woke left and the lead actor subscribes to qanon. You really didn't know this? Also if he really cares about children, how about donating to that charity you linked instead of lining the pockets of grifters promoting a fact movie?

Come on, be real. You said your buddy is a maga, and this is the only movie he's ever used as marketing for his cabinet business. You think he randomly picked this movie to buy out theaters or is it because other magas are doing the same thing?

Pretty much exposes the BS from the right on this whole topic

Does he do this for other movies? If it's part of marketing for his business, fine whatever, sounds weird but whatever. If he's doing it because ITS THE MOST IMPORTANT MOVIE OF OUR LIFETIME AND PEOPLE NEED TO SEE THIS MOVIE BECAUSE ITS BEING SUPRESSED then I'm sorry but your friend is a mark.

Real shocker there

It goes along with the narrative of the film. PATRIOTS, THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT MOVIE OF OUR LIVES! EVERYONE MUST SEE THIS! BUY TIX FOR OTHERS! Classic grift strategy. Meanwhile none of this money goes to actually helping kids. But these smooth brains fall for it every time.

Buy tickets for other people, dummy.

Roger really pumping potatoes over peanut butter

I told you, you can provide the evidence, I'm all ears.

No, actually it's dismissed because there isn't enough evidence to prove it.

I think it's possible. But I'm not making the leap to blood harvesting. Sorry, I can't buy into Qanon

Evidence withheld/doesn't exist. A conspiracy theory is by definition a theory that hasn't or can't be proven to be true, therefore the data is filled in. They are all unproven, until they are proven. Also every vaccine, in order to be labeled a vaccine, has to undergo safety and efficacy tests, so it is considered safe once it's labeled.

Actually trying to connect the dots based on loose evidence is how conspiracy theories are formed. The scientific method is where you have an observation/question, form a hypothesis, then collect evidence to test the hypothesis, and then determine if it can be proven or not.

We had heard who Epstein associated with, pretty much everybody, from Clinton to Trump to Gates to everyone. Did they all abuse kids? I sure hope not. I don't think Epstein kept that list, nor have any of them admitted it, nor will they. I tend to only believe things that there is evidence of.

No that's not it. I'm not scared of a label, I just don't believe any of what they believe because it's been either debunked or not proven, and none of it makes sense to me. Epstein, yes I believe he was a trafficker and some of his clients were powerful.

Sorry I don't believe any of this. Hopefully this doesn't make you think that I'm part of it.

Asian confirmed.

oh sh!t I remember that. What a focking douche. I believe I gave him sh1t for that, I hope I did.

So to be clear, "they" are the child traffickers, the secret society that controls the media?

I was providing those tweets as a different opinion that you might find interesting. If you're going to dismiss it based on a flag, well ok, but I believe you were just saying how we shouldn't automatically dismiss people because they are Qanon. Secret society controlling the media? We'll have to agree to disagree here. The Sinclair video? That is one media conglomerate operating many local affiliates. They're all owned by the same company, so they all push the same narrative. It's not the illuminati controling hundreds of individual entities. Make sense?

He originally posted "I like white power", then he changed it to "I like camp fires". I saw it.