GutterBoy

Sproles was the shocker for me. Reggie bush

The deleted tweets are documented in the links that you asked and refused to read, I didn't make anything up. She was suspended for indirect violations of TOS, not because they didn't like her. You constantly make sh1t up and lie and can't prove that Twitter was a lefty echo chamber like you said it was.

Twitter was not a left echo chamber. Lott being suspended doesn't prove that at all. You have been wrong from the start.

They said it was an indirect violation leading to suspension, not a direct violation leading to a ban. We keep going in circles here. And none of this proves that Twitter was a lefty echo chamber, so why does it matter? I guess deflect from the original point.

Gotta be Brian Mitchell near the top, dude played forever and was a return monster. We actually had to change our FF rules to exclude return yards because he was too OP.

Well the violation is in the eyes of Twitter, and if Twitter thinks you're encouraging harassment by tweeting, "these groomers are targeting teens, maybe someone should do somwthing to protect the kids wink wink", then deal with it.

You know lefty's got banned too right?

You didn't read strikes link either. Has nothing to do with not liking tweets, it's tweeting content that leads to or incites harassment, which is exactly what she did.

If that's true, it's probably because there were more right wing accounts that got banned previously, and that's because more right wing accounts spread misinformation.

It wasn't right down the middle, everyone knows that. But it wasn't a lefty echo chamber either, smart people know that, but not Jerry or strike. There was plenty of right wing on Twitter before musk, probably more now, I don't know, but there is still enough of both sides to get everyone what they want to see.

It was strikes entire point you focking tool box.

Tell us all again how this proves that Twitter was a lefty echo chamber.

I already told you we're done since you're obviously just acting like a douche, but since you called me out, I have to tell you that you need to read what you posted, because it specifically says that the account indirectly violates the TOS, thus the suspension warning, and if they directing violated it, then it's a ban. As we've already established, they were never banned, remember you lied about that, so this is nothing new. None of this proves that Twitter was a left wing echo chamber like you claimed. Give up douche.

Come on, it's all right here man. Never banned, you're wrong. Then you pivoted to... FYI, I said they violated the TOS, actually twitter did, and they did because they were suspended for it, so that's actually the proof you're lookin for, but anyway. Yes suspended, for violating TOS, specifically hateful speech and harrassment and threats Which again is wrong, and I provided multiple examples of this. The first being the litterbox lie, followed up by a link to the school for her followers to voice their concern. Link: https://www.readtpa.com/p/the-big-lie-about-the-libs-of-tiktok Again with the children's hospital where she tweeted out that minors were getting hysterectomies, but it was again a lie, and her followers harassed the hospital, Link: https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/features/100467 And Again, with the Idaho event where she work with other white supremacists to harass people at the event. Link: https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2022/06/14/far-right-influencers-hyped-coeur-dalene-pride-patriot-front-showed I provided the examples, proving you wrong again. Then you went to this.... The "proof" that they violated the TOS was Twitter saying it. You asked for an example, I gave you an example, and in this example she tweets out a false story and tells her followers what to do next, contact the school. Harassment. The second link has multiple examples of hateful speech, which violate the TOS, as it's stated. Not sure what proof you need that a tweet is hateful, but twitter did. Then you attack the source, and ignore the ACTUAL TWEETS that are in the links, but you refuse to read the links because they are lefty sites. We're done. I've wasted enough time on you. You clearly are only interested in acting like a douche.

It was in no definition a "Left wing echo chamber". There was PLENTY of right wing content on that site for years. You made an incorrect statement. Feel free to correct yourself.

She deletes the tweets herself, as you can see in several of the links. Tweets something false, then tells her followers where to follow up, and they do the rest. Several examples I posted. So now that you've moved the goalposts to "Proof that they violated the TOS" and the links are "lefty sites" it's clear you're not acting in good faith. Twitter doesn't prove any violation, they say you violate the TOS, and you are suspended. I'm not searching through her thousands of tweets to find the violators, I googled, which you are incapable of, and provided the stories. LOTT is not just retweeting liberals, and she was most certainly on twitter along with many many other right wing accounts which makes it in fact false that twitter was a left wing echo chamber prior to musk. Again, keep your mouth shut when you have nothing to add.

https://www.readtpa.com/p/the-big-lie-about-the-libs-of-tiktok https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/04/chaya-raichik-libs-tiktok-groomer-tweets.html https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/features/100467 https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkg75m/chaya-raichik-libs-of-tiktok-cpac https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2022/06/14/far-right-influencers-hyped-coeur-dalene-pride-patriot-front-showed https://www.losangelesblade.com/2022/07/09/canadian-lgbtq-youth-centre-attacked-by-extremist-libs-of-tik-tok/ https://mashable.com/article/libs-of-tiktok-furries-school-troll-fake https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/1/3/2145218/-When-hatemongers-like-LibsofTikTok-s-Raichik-spread-anti-LGBTQ-smears-real-violence-happens

bullsh1t with the "she just reposts liberals", she does much more than that and got caught, and there are examples all over her twitter feed. Never banned, just suspended, but she was allowed to keep posting her hatred as long as it didn't violate TOS.

Nope, never banned, lie #1. Yes suspended, for violating TOS, specifically hateful speech and harrassment and threats, not holding a conservative opinion. So now none of this proves Jerry's point, and you should be quiet unless you have something valuable to add.

Someone really needs attention, so much that they have multiple posts in a Barbie thread that mock someone posting in a Barbie thread.

Oh my bad. I must have imagined libsoftiktok, catturd, Shapiro, Posobeic and all the other right wing twitter accounts before the Musk purchase.

Yeah that's a good point. My initial instinct would be to tell people to run or get down. It's not a good look for him to just nope off stage, but I don't see how you can blame him. This tweet seems like a reach.

I saw news that Barbie had a huge weekend, I went to twitter to see what folks were saying, and one of the first tweets was Posobiec burning dolls, and I shared it here. You may call that triggered, but it's not the correct definition of the term. And if you think pre Musk was a left echo chamber you are not a smart person, or you just like to use over the top hyperbole. You can google that.

OK, well I'm glad you've stopped telling me that I'm triggered, which shows some clarity. Now you've pivoted to "protecting the kids", predictable. The folks on the right need their leaders to tell them what to think, and burning dolls is the best way to do this, so parents can stop their kids from forming their own opinions. Makes sense.

Actually it was 7am, as part of my morning routine that I previously outlined. And if you think this is on par with burning dolls, then you're dumber than I thought.