Brooklyn1106

Thanks for mine. .5 ppr means West for me. I think he is gameflow-proof, which is nice, and they're really trying to turn him into Charles. But it is close - JStew always shows up in the fantasy playoffs...

I agree with echo - if mcfadden plays a full game he should see 15-20 touches. play him. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=450333

I have same issue, starting Hill just because Cleveland stinks on run D, manziel starting on short week means gameflow should dictate he gets almost 20 carries. I could see a 2td game from him. but latavius has been running like a boss - just a bad spot, pitt not horrible on run D, early game on east coast after big win, etc. it's a nice problem to have. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=450333

Phew, that's tough. What's the rest of your lineup? I'd probably go with Crabtree because of gameflow and the raiders needing to (and probably able to) score, but barely. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=450333

I think you mostly have it right, but I would consider the switch at TE, just because gameflow could limit Eifert if the Bengals blowout Browns quickly (and you already have dalton going). You could say the same thing for the saints/titans, but at least you wouldn't completely bomb if dalton doesn't need to throw it much. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=450333

Someone dropped Bortles going into his Bye and matchup @ NYJ. I have Big Ben too, basically already solidified a playoff spot if not top-2 finish. Would you drop either Stafford or Moncrief (I have Calvin Johnson, Jarvis Landry, Allen Robinson) for Bortles?

Man, that is tough. Honestly, if Maclin *does* play, I'd probably go Kelce. But if he doesn't, then Pitt just keys on Kelce (D hasn't been horrible this year, just stuffed the cardinals), and Smith will never throw him the ball. Plus, if big ben doesn't come back, that game might be a snoozer. I think I go Decker - guaranteed targets, Pats won't be keying him, they'll need to score regardless of ball control with Ivory. Decker.

Do it. For you, Rivers is a wash. We're really talking Foster for Brady, in which case, with AP/Forte, you have your RB1s (and not a horrible crew of RB2s). But you'd be getting the leading points scorer at QB if not overall..

Yeah, do it. With your RBs on the up and up, trotting out Nuk and Marshall is all you really need at WR. And Rishard ain't bad. Whatever drop from Brady to Rodgers (if any) is worth it. Still getting 20-25pts.

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=449804

Haha, both Brown and Snead are in the "Grab Your Helmet" group this week.. http://www.fftoday.com/articles/cavaliere/scr_15_wk7_wrs.html

Tough one.. Brown has been a monster lately and seems to be on the up, but Snead is in a game that they'll probably be trailing. If you think the ravens can keep it close in AZ with cardinals coming off a disappointing loss, then go brown. I'd probably go Brown, too. mine: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=449804

I say 70% make the trade. In addition to seconding the above "rather have more strong RBs" statement, I'm not liking where cobb is trending personally. Seems like teams are scheming him out, and he's also a little gimpy. I feel like he's not *significantly* more valuable that your other non-OBJ WRs - but I feel you, it's tough to let Rodgers #1 wr go.. mine: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=449804

Who else is on your waiver wire? Stafford/Bradford seem to at least be good streamers; weirdly, can't say the same for peyton. case in point, he was dropped in a league I'm in, and I'm not sure if anyone is going to pick him up.. mine: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=449804

Yeah, I say stick with Gio if not PPR, unless you get crazy return yardage points or something. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=449804