Jump to content

5-Points

Members
  • Content Count

    19,914
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    43

Everything posted by 5-Points

  1. I really don't care. But is it your contention that Hillary did nothing wrong?
  2. If Trump identified as a ham sandwich, they'd indict him for it.
  3. Unfortunately, I don't subscribe to that rag so I can't read your linked article. But if the Mueller report said so I guess it must be fact.
  4. Not really. You can indict a ham sandwich. Start with the AG and DA who campaigned on locking Trump up. Why was the judge handpicked from outside of the pool? That's not normal. Why was there no change of venue granted? It's quite simple and it was right out in the open. You'd have to be an idiot to think this was a "fair" trial.
  5. Dude, the "lock her up" chants came from the debate when Trump mopped the floor with hillary. She said, whatever she said, nobody remembers and he clapped back with "because you'd be in jail." See, unlike the current senile mess in the White House, Trump can come up with clever one liners off the cuff. It was hilarious at the time and he played it for all it was worth. But when it came down to it, he didn't pursue it because he knew nothing would come of it. But it wasn't because no crime was committed.
  6. Uh, because he wasn't serious and the people attending his rallies had a good time with it. You guys need to stop taking everything he says literally. Seriously.
  7. You'd think at some point they'd take a step back and revisit their delusional ranting and realize they've been wrong at every turn. But they don't have time for that. On to the next manufactured threat to democracy. Quick! Look over here!
  8. Trump said he would lock her up after he won. Which he didn't do. Dems trying to lock Trump up so he can't run. Bored dummies: "It's the same thing!"
  9. How do you think they decided to whom to send the summons'?
  10. I'm sure, given the evidence allowed and, more importantly, the evidence not allowed, to be presented, the jury probably had no alternative but to return a verdict of guilty. My point was, the prosecution and the judge knew what they were doing and that it will likely be reversed post election. In other words, this was election interference from start to finish.
  11. Can't drag yourself away from this place, huh?
  12. I don't gamble with my hard earned cash. Loser leaves the board for a predetermined period of time. Take it or leave it.
  13. Sure. I'll leave the bored for a month. You leave for four.
  14. If they succeed in removing Trump from the equation, they can trot out anybody. Unfortunately, my gut says Newsom.
  15. I've always felt that way. Otherwise you encourage recidivism. If a guy is never allowed to rejoin society, why should he try to live by society's rules?
  16. So they reclassified his "crimes" from misdemeanors to felonies to get around the statute of limitations? Seems legit.
  17. As it should be. Once you've paid your debt to society you should be released with rights intact, imo.
  18. There's no way Biden is on the ticket in November.
  19. But the statute of limitations ran out on the state misdemeanor. So they resurrected them as federal felonies, no? This whole dog and pony show has been a clusterfock from the beginning. I can't keep up with all the shenanigans.
  20. Nope. He can still be elected and pardon himself.
  21. That still leaves him a month to campaign. Can't have that.
  22. Meh, she can stay at one of his many other homes.
×