5-Points

Sean Ryan has one of the most popular podcasts on the planet. He vets his guests extensively. If he airs anything erroneous, he will publicly post a retraction. As will I, if it comes to that. Until then, I will listen to him and his take on all things military related. You do you.

And I'm sure nothing that was said made you question anything you've heard from your "news" sources. Your intellectual curiosity gets bored easily when you hear things that contradict what you've been told to believe.

Yeah you have. You've gone from cyber truck nonsense to this nonsense. I watched the podcast. I listened to what was said. I drew a conclusion and I shared it here. I never said anything was etched in stone, fact. You lose.

Let me know when you settle on a place for those goalposts. TIA

Mebbe brush up on your comprehension skill a little. I said the cyber truck contained the blast, because it did. I said I found the portion of the interview where they said he chose the cyber truck because of that possible capability "particularly interesting." I never said it was a fact that he chose it because of that fact. The Tim Kennedy text I'm referring to was shown in the Sean Ryan podcast I posted at about the 23:50 mark.

@TimHauck Show me where I said it was fact. I said I found that portion of the interview "particularly interesting." Also, Tim said he "knew Matt" in his text. Are you calling Tim Kennedy a liar?

I didn't say it was fact, I said I found it particularly interesting. Maybe you didn't. I also found it interesting that his Signal safety number changed, supposedly, after he died. And Tim Kennedy's text stating he knew the guy and he was "in good standing", which is telling, and that "he was on to better stuff." That doesn't sound like a guy about to blow sh!t up and off himself. I could be completely wrong. But I'm not going to believe what the media says about this. There's a cover-up afoot.

He proves it, daily.

Did you expect to him to lay out his plan before hand? He took great pains to reach out before he carried out his plans. Presumably because he didn't want anybody to be able to intervene.

Like I said, I'm not trying to convince you of anything. If I've learned anything from your time on this bored it's that if the msm never said George Soros said it, or if one of your chosen Twitter follows didn't confirm it, you'll never believe it. I don't feel the need to prove anything to you. Soros' own life is proof that he's a despicable shitbag, who takes great pleasure in bringing down countries by wreaking havoc on their economies. He's made billions doing so. Believe what you want. It matters not to me.

And?

There's no proof he never said it. None. But his life's work has proven that it is the exact kind of sh!t he does. Coupled with his funding of anti-American DA's all over the country and the subsequent civil unrest that has followed, it doesn't take a genius to figure out. It does, however, take a modicum of common sense.

I focking hope so. I was about to rip into him but I kinda like the guy so I chose to assume he was being sarcastic.

You're right, I can't prove that the guy that didn't look for proof of Soros saying that didn't find it.

Fat chicks in yoga pants.

Truth: You can't prove that he never said it or that the Reuters fact check is correct, can you?

I don't think for myself. It's too hard. I prefer to let some dipshit on TV tell me what to believe.

I'd never waste my time trying to convince you of anything. However, he has made billions off of impoverishing countries by attacking their currencies. He's attempted to overthrow governments all over the world in order to install regimes more sympathetic to his needs. But no, you're right, he'd never do it here.

Yeah it is. Everytime we contact one, away they go.

Fact checked.

It's not funny or even remotely similar. One of the founding principles of this country was the private ownership of guns. It's embodied in the Bill of Rights. What amendment to the constitution enshrines the right of anyone, anywhere in the world to cross our border illegally? Tell your liberal friends there are plenty of countries they can move to if they don't want private ownership of guns. I'll bet those countries also have secure borders.

See, this is how it works. Libs: "You can't call them illegals. No person can be illegal. We prefer the term 'undocumented'" Also Libs: "Let's give them drivers licenses. Then they'll be documented." Yeah, fock off.

Deporting them is most beneficial for our society.

I expect to see a serious uptick in deportations in the not too distant future.

A drivers license is a privilege. Illegal immigrants don't deserve any privileges. hth