Frozenbeernuts

Yeah it's a fine line. The more power to censor speech, the more it will be abused. There can't be a single authority tasked with truth, because bias always sets in. I want as much speech allowed as possible. It's up to everyone else to determine what is real. It's also about to get really wild when videos can be created that look completely real but are fabricated. If we censor those though, it becomes easy to explain any video away as fake. I look at it like this. Would you want this power in the hands of the party you don't like? If you're OK with that, well at least it's consistent. If you're not, then you will not like this type of censorship once that party gains power.

I guess the optimist in me looks at the 1st amendment as our saving grace to fight against the will of our countries leaders, not as any type of block.

When you know the real reason why being gay has become so important to the left but they have absolutely no clue why it's such a big deal now.

If your child wanted to cut off their arm would you let them? It's a decision there is no going back from when surgery is involved. I would do everything in my power to teach my kids to love themselves the way they are. If they make it to 18 and they want to do it, well it's their body. Children though? I see too many heart breaking stories of people who were allowed to change their gender and now regret it. There's no going back. If the role of government does not include getting involved in allowing or not allowing children to cut off their genitals, then it shouldn't be involved in almost anything else. Everything at that point is over stepping.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/09/29/john_kerry_tells_wef_our_first_amendment_stands_as_a_major_block_against_hammering_disinformation_out_of_existence.html

I wouldn't recommend voting for her. The least qualified person to ever run for office.

The republican politicians suck. I don't trust them any more than the liberal politicians because they are all in on this together. Which explains their limp wristed attempts at countering all the things the left pulls. Back to the point, do you believe that the republican party is the only dishonest party here, and John Kerry is correct? That the first amendment is a major block to stopping disinformation?

Do her supporters just not like going to rallies and events? Seems odd that she would be so popular, but her and Walz have low turn outs. Another thing that I find odd with these polls is that Trump is the most beloved presidential candidate we have had in a while. Kamala has none of that. Yet she is up in the polls? It doesn't add up.

Ts and Ps coming your way. When it's your kids, it's really tough to see them go through this stuff.

We have seen this with a few liberal politicians. Judge Joe Brown has some good stuff on Kamala. Here he explains how she has nothing to do with the black race. Probably why she isn't doing very well with minorities. https://x.com/TheRightMelissa/status/1838395187359342824?t=iAsEvnWqwYbGkxXI5ws8XQ&s=19

At the first metal concert in a while. Anyone else see these bands before? Pumped to see Gojira.

Korn puts on an absolutely insane show still. Incredible.

I had no money to start my company. 0. And yet I found a way. Whatever you believe to be true is true. Every thought you have and every word you speak crafts and attracts your reality. Victim mentality is the most debilitating thing you can have.

The FBI has social media sites block mention of the laptop and said it didn't exist. Why would they go to such lengths for something that didn't exist? Then they has to admit it existed when it was being used as evidence in court. Why go through all that trouble for something that was supposed to not exist, but then also shouldn't have any really damming evidence on it?

Because Trump isn't dumb. It was a smart move. Vance has also changed his view on Trump. Like I have and many others have.

I mean... they all do this. Every single one of them to varying degrees. Do I want a guy who may stretch the truth at times to frame something, but is a qualified leader, anti child mutilation, wants to stop the flow of immigrants, isn't threatening to reduce our 1st and 2nd amendment rights, and wants to end all of the wars? Vs Open chaotic border, threats of removing disinformation (laughable that any one group could be trusted to hold the power of truth), pro child mutilation through surgery and hormone replacement etc. Give me the first one. Kamala Harris supports cutting off a child's reproductive parts and giving them hormone replacement. Isn't that really messed up to you? Shouldn't that be a topic that is very high on our concern list?

Most politicians yes. Trump is not in the same camp as most Republicans. Does he represent me perfectly? No. But you can't find a candidate to represent anyone perfectly. So what's your point? Who is your perfect candidate?

This economy is great for me. Anyone who claims it is bad is playing the victim here. There has never been more opportunity to get rich, and people can do it from their house. If someone believes the economy is bad and that they can't get ahead, that will be their reality. No matter who wins, I will benefit. I just know that I will benefit more and the country will benefit more from a Trump win.

Anyone can write in anyone's name, but he's out of the race. Why waste a vote on him when people can vote for the guy he endorsed?

Are liberals going to gloss over that democrats are openly planning on clamping down on speech? What they call misinformation. This shouldn't even need to be explained, but no single group even has the capacity to discern what is true or not. They could be the most genuine truthful people in the world, and they would still mess it up if given the task of Abiter of Truth.

What's funny is the third party guy so many people liked endorsed Trump. This one tripped up multiple friends I had who were going to vote for RFK

No because even though Trump is a pig, he is so much better for the country than what the left offers it's not comparable. And a third party doesn't stand a chance. RFK junior would have been very popular for a third party, but he still didn't stand a chance. Look at merit. Trump is a leader. He will get things that benefit the US. Kamala couldn't communicate anything with any real leaders of the world. She is just flat out unqualified to lead this country. This shouldn't even be a debate. She is the least qualified candidate to ever be leading either party, and again it's not even close. Trump is qualified.

I haven't seen anything tying Trump to Epstein other than a few photos. Just like with the Diddy pics, those two have a lot of pics with a lot of people. That doesn't make them guilty.

Yeah paying a hooker doesn't really compare to a satanic cult of pedophiles.

Kamala Harris compares ICE to the KKK. I wonder why ICE and other people working at the border are throwing her under the bus with smiles on their faces. I wonder if she's intoxicated. Seems like a similar slurring of the speech to often drunk on the job Nancy Pelosi. https://x.com/DefiyantlyFree/status/1839821969371582930?t=ajAJrfkr4aaipbrO4BV3gQ&s=19