hoffdaddy

Then where have you been? Sorry, I've had a busy couple of days filled with OB/GYN, Pediatricians and stuff. I'll get back to you shortly....

I'm trying to damn it....

Hoff gets: Ahman Green Tony Fisher Drj gets: Domanick Davis 1.04

Missed 1 Hoff gets - Ty's #4 in 04' (4.01) DrJ gets - Hoffs #4 in 04' (4.11) and Scorp's #4 in 04' (4.13)

Cut Galloway, thanks.

Yes it was. Tough to give up DD when he's played so well, and equally tough to give up a draft pick in the top four. However, worth it to get Ahman and a solid Fisher.

#5 sounds good to me. You have mail.

I vote yes to reseed. I don't like the idea of awarding the tie breaker to the higher seed. Why not designate only 1 or 2 players as your tie-break players. It would save time, and odds are very slim that the two you pick would be tied. Just a thought.

Works for me, I vote yes also.

Sure.

I agree.

if the price is right. I also have plenty of other picks and players that can be moved. Just make me an offer. Everyone is fair game.

Sorry to hear that.

My mistake. You are 3, Hoff is 4. It is corrected. Bastard

QB-Kitna RB-Davis RB-Westbrook WR-Smith WR-Mason WR-Porter TE-Crumpler D-Carolina K-Cundiff

QB-Jon Kitna RB-Domanick Davis RB-Brian Westbrook WR-Jimmy Smith WR-Derrick Mason WR-Jerry Porter TE-Alge Crumpler D-Carolina K-Billy Cundiff

Hey, I voted yes on your focking trade. What more do you want from me?

I think this is a VERY good idea. This would remove the restriction entirely. I like it.

Most likely 5th. Hoff will drop below you if Tommy Maddox and Tai Streets score 3 or more tonight. wink At this point, I'd rather just keep dropping. Damn Westbrook to HELL!!!!

I could get behind a version of this. I'm not looking to penalize teams who make free agent pickups. Just trying to make sure that the 2 FA rule isn't side stepped.

More or less, yes. I vote yes on the deal, I just think it needs to be addressed.

Amen to that.

Here's the meat of my objection. If you disagree fine. Like I said, there are no hard feelings. This is collusion. Plain and simple. Granted, it's not top notch players, but has this "I'll scratch your back you scratch mine" happened before? I can't answer that, and I'm not accusing anyone of anything, it just makes me curious. Perhaps I'm not trusting enough. All I'm saying is, it's collusion. I've heard this statement many times "Don't veto unless obvious collusion". This is obvious. So maybe next time a trade offer is on the table, a certain team gets a little better deal because they helped another team out of a jam. Doesn't seem right to me, and I'd rather not start going down that road in this league. Maybe I'm overreacting to this one, and if so, I apologize. This is just how I feel at this moment.

Didn't say it was illegal. Just thought it was cheesey. That's all. No ill feelings, no spite, and I'm not bitter.

Let's see if I got this right. Ty uses both of his waiver picks for this week. Decided he wants another one, so has Stick use his, then trades a worthless seventh rounder for said player. Rather cheesey in my book.