ian Potter

3 targets in two games for a guy that was being touted as top 5 TE potential. Yeah, its concernimg

So much for burton being a sleeper this year!

What would you be looking to Get in a trade for Connor? Want to strike while the iron is hot? Think guys like Gordon and Howard are feasible?

There goes Adams value. Own him in almost every league.

I did the same!

I was under impression he could be traded with a new team reworking a new deal. If so Connors value would be through the roof.

What are your thoughts on the chances that bell gets traded? Seems like hes lost the locker room and theres no way hes there next year.

Rb- Kelly- rams Rb- eckler- Chargers TE- Goedert- eagles Wr- Allison- packers

Kamara was gone. My debate was hunt, Barkley, or Gordon. Took Hunt. Thought Gordon would make it back to me. Hamstring injury worried me. Think I’m having some buyers remorse now.

Just dropped Blue! GREAT!!!!!!!

No romo and you can write off the cowboys! They'd be lucky to finish 8-8

^^^^^^^^^^^^

How'd that work out? Murray averages 5 yards a carry. You Pound that f'er in. Could see it on 3rd down.

One of best o-lines in football and weedan passes it twice from the 2 yard line. Give the ball to Murray!

Maclin and brown for erasing my 40 pt lead. Need romo and Cobb to out score Ingram and erase 19 point deficit. Also an fu for being second highest scorer and out scoring my league mates by 35!

Not trying to be insensitive but he punched his wife in the face! He's a total loser but there are people who have been convicted of far worse and still got to play in the NFL. Not sure how the NFL can keep him from playing given the NJ attorney general didn't file any charges. It's a given he'll be back and will be forgiven with the first touchdown he makes. He will get another chance and some team Might have a real steal in terms if his talent. He's had a lot of rest and might be very determined when he returns. I could see the Pats, broncos, colts, falcons, bills, saints, panthers, jets, browns, jags, and titans considering him.

Spoken like a true eagles fan. And why is this? They just beat the Super Bowl champs. Score didn't dictate how lopsided the game was. This team doesn't appear to be the weak team it's illustrated to be in the past. Regardless of what happens it will be to Romos fault. If by chance they make it to the big game he will be given zero or no credit. Their offensive line appears to be the best in football, have one if the better receiving cores, one of the better backs in football and a QB that can get the job done. Defensively I'm not sure what to make of them but they've been playing pretty big as of late. I dont think they'll make it to the Super Bowl but their outlook is pretty good for the next few years.

League on Thursday got me thinking about this. Commish was involved in trade for Bradshaw and Patterson and gave up Jeffery. Trade process is 1 day with league being able to turn it down. Nothing wrong with the trade but he pushed it through within two hours and started Bradshaw. He claims that since it was a fair trade and that no one ever vetoes trades, he saw nothing wrong with pushing it through early. He was surprised that myself another owner called him out on it. He said he wasn't trying to gain any kind of advantage. Needless to say the trade was reversed the next day and resubmitted. He made good on his error but only after digging himself a pretty steep hole. What do you guys have?

Teams should be able to manage their own teams. I said the trade was fine. I just don't get how he bends the rules to benefit his team and than decides we should change the rule. I agree trades should be pushed through. However, put it to league vote. Don't just change it to benefit your team and automatically decide this is how it's going to be because u need a running back this week.

starting him but I don't have many options. Honestly, don't see Dallas wanting to test Seattles secondary. Murray might have 30 carries.

agree it does but make the offer sooner. I can't manipulate the rules to favor myself. One man is in charge of that. First trade every pushed through and he happened to be the person that needed it. All the sudden he felt it was time to change the rules. Be one thing to put it to a unanimous vote. We all put in money; agreed to a set of rules. Follow the rules for the year; change it next year.

(voting on trades) Now when someone makes a trade at 11:30 a.m. on a Sunday and the commish doesn't push it thru in time for kickoff, then whats plan? agree with all these. said the same things. said it would only be for Thursday games; then said maybe it wasn't a good idea. It's all or none. not when it's convenient for him. Stuff like this is what kills leagues; causes player dumps, teams to trade players away in spite of a ruling, or all out quitting league during season. Follow rules during season, change them in offseason. my contention was that if he delays putting it through and some guy sets his line up he can argue it either way. I wanted player a and got player b and vice versa. I'm all for forcing the trades through provided it doesn't deal with collusion. However, you can' t pick and choose. I've played in this league for years, never had an issue until now. First trade he's ever expedited. Not sure whats going on but it will be my last year.

Dropped him in 3 leagues today so I could start either a K or Def. Wouldn't have had to if I didn't pick up Starks earlier in week. smfh!

Anyone seeing a huge difference between the two the rest of the way? I'm in a 14 team league with 6 pt qb tds( also ppr). Figure nows the time to try to move one to a team with a struggling qbs: rg3/cousins, newton, kap, etc. Have potential to get Bernard and sanders for one of the qbs and Asaita. Just want to move the right qb. Think it's basically a coin toss. Both have terrible defs. Only difference I see that's major is saints have better running game. Also not very confident w/ how saints off is looking this year. Any thoughts?