jhud423
Members-
Content Count
131 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by jhud423
-
Is Donald Brown really so much better that he will return as the starter?
-
I was ready to watch Ballard take all the snaps tonight and heard that he would. All we heard all week was that Brown would not play....and look at this alternating series' BS!!!!!!!!
-
And you're still a douche????
-
Yeah...that, or I set my lineup based on what EVERYONE said and didn't have a chance to change it. I didn't know Brown was in until the game had started. What, with the gametime decision and all. Nice try
-
Oh I'm sorry. Excuse me for starting a guy who I believed (and rightfully so) was getting all the carries only to be flip-flopped for Donald Brown's sorry azz at kickoff. My bad, dumbazz.
-
^^^^^^^^^ THIS!!!! So sick of Donald Brown's overrated azz! He MAY be more athletic than Ballard, but geez when the hell are the Colts going to give up on this bum? Ballard runs MUCH harder. I ended up with 5 points from Ballard when he should have easily been in double digits last night given the opportunity.
-
No thanks. This crap may very possibly send me into retirement after the season. So much garbage this year.
-
Look at his stats the last 6 weeks. 5 out of 6 of those weeks he put up good numbers. I agree with you. All the CJ haters are just mad they were wrong.
-
Is he worth a buy low? I'm thinking about trying to package MJD in a deal to get him, especially since MJD is out indefinitely. Thoughts?
-
Wow that is an awesome site!
-
Absolutely. I'd roll with Gonzo...you will have two WR1's from here on out with AJ and Cobb.
-
Pull the trigger NOW!!!!!!!!!! Cobb is an absolute STUD due to the latest news on Jennings...he was REALLY good before that! And you know what you have with Welker. DO IT.
-
"Trade high" typically means you are trading someone at their peak before they go downhill. What makes you think Cobb goes downhill??? Maybe Jones since he traditionally catches the dropsies. Cobb is a stud, dude. Trading him right now would be retarded.
-
Would you give him up for Reggie Bush? Other suggestions?
-
Austin or Mathews. I don't like Mathews, so that's who I would sit...don't care who he's playing.
-
I have MJD, and I am wondering if I should bother dropping Ballard for Jennings. I have never been a huge "handcuff" type of guy if I have other starting RB's anyway. Ballard has a really good matchup this week, so should I make this move or not?
-
Yes, pull the trigger. You are doing this deal to get AJ...that's it. And I do think CJ has "found it again". Three of the last 4 weeks he has done very well. He is a RB1 for the rest of the way.
-
Pick three: Julio Jones at Philly, Josh Gordon vs Chargers, Randall Cobb vs Jags, Desean Jackson vs Falcons? I also have Mikel Leshoure vs Seahawks to play instead of one of them in the flex.
-
You do have a good argument, but I could agree with both sides. There are absolutely things that veteran fantasy football players know to do and newbie players don't generally know. For example, let's say you had a 15 point lead going into MNF and your opponent had Jermichael Finley playing, while you still had a chance to play a poor DST who was facing Green Bay's potent offense. If you are in a league that consistently scored negative points for DST's, it would most likely be a wise move to not even play the DST. This way, all you are counting on are your odds of knowing Jermichael Finley would have to score 16 points to beat you, and that's all you have to worry about. Perfect example of a skilled fantasy owner making a good move. On the other hand, you could have a team full of top 10's at every position and they all tank in the championship game. You can never be assured that a team full of studs will produce for you...never. This is why one could argue that fantasy football is way more than 50% luck. And I would not disagree.
-
Seriously. 9 points from him at flex...I'm happy with that.
-
Are you retarded??
-
Whadya know???? Apparently the announcers were wrong!!
-
Clearly you got your feelings hurt. So much for "not arguing". I've seen several reports that said foot. I thought it made no difference, though???
-
Will all due respect....for the second time, it's his FOOT.
-
I'm hearing foot injury...not ankle. So it's a torn foot ligament??