benglish88

Now is certainly not the week to do it. The freaking Giants? Come on, why is this a question.

Okay: I can tell you right now that Spiller has been a bust all year, (but we all know that).... I don't believe he is "healthy" now.......Do you believe this? How could you believe for sure he is? Jackson has gotten no credit, but he is the one to start here. What do you mean by 4 of 6 Jackson has been unstartable? I am starting him for sure tomorrow. Just trying to get on the same page as you.

This! I think Weeden is gonna make Gordon even more valuable to own. Didn't Gordon almost have 20 targets? That is just crazy! I love it. I just hope Weeden keeps chucking it.

And those who are senseless enough to believe it......what a hoax...

Gotcha. The way that game started out, you would think it would have gotten into the 30's! I hope Ellington shows up big this week......I need him.

Yep, I agree. It can also be seen that the poster making a blanket statement calling those who agree with the call "dipsh*ts". At the end of the day it is an opinion, but calling others names shows what that poster is all about. I am done with it, don't have a dog in the fight.

The only dipsh*t is you if you believe that ball is catchable. Flat out silly you are.

Hey guys, I have to pick up a defense this week, so I have to drop one of these guys. Who would you suggest? I don't want to part with either one!!!! Scared one of my opponents will use them against me when I cut them!

They should rename this thread: Beating A Dead Horse 101. I will simplify it: 1. NO WAY Gronkowski catches that ball. 2. Even in slow mo replay, he still would not catch that ball. 3. IF, he tried to "sell" the PI a little bit more instead of continuing the same route--(maybe he merits a stronger case). He didn't, Patriots lost the game, end of story.

Man, still think the Saints are worth it on a short week?

Saw him going off the first half. I went to bed, got up and he didn't throw any more TD's after that? Did Indy figure him out the 2nd half?

I hear ya bro. I think Hilton is the truth for sure. I am with you on that. I just don't believe in him as a "route runner". Cruz v/s Hilton as far as I am concerned is a similar situation, but 2 different players. Cruz got his chance, like Hilton, but Cruz is simply exceptional_ unless of course, Hilton just blows it up! Hey Why Not? But I just think Cruz was a far better technical player who got his shot and stood out a little more. Do I think of Ty ahead of Boykin? Hmmmmmmm...yes, but only by a couple of spots.

I don't see it. He is a straight line pattern type of receiver(TY). I figure he will get covered up pretty good now.

this

I agree. He seemed to be very involved in that game I watched this Sunday. If the matchups are right, he can be a stud. Funny, I have Charles--(who's hair looks quite similar to McCluster's) and I thought that was Charles going off. Nope, it was McCluster. He is sneaky.