Brutal Brutus
-
Content Count
1,948 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Brutal Brutus
-
-
Not a bad bye week fill in guy. Clearly the deep threat, is emerging as the #3 option there by taking over as the starting outside receiver opposite of Brown. Wheaton, and Rodgers will still take some of the targets away from him, but he is clearly on a different level of those guys in terms of talent. He's a good receiver to have as he can be a spot start right now, and offers second half of the year upside.
-
Kessler, Keenum, Gabbert, Farve. Unless you own Cam he shouldn't factor into your plans. We probably won't know if Cam is out for sure until Monday, and Anderson certainly isn't worth the risk of not having a starting QB. If you want to roll the dice on starting Cam and having him as plan B, that's the only situation I can see him being put into anyone's lineup unless something changes and Cam is ruled out early.
-
I'd do Brown for Coleman all day. Cooper for Michael is a bit more a matter of opinion. I'm not sold on Cooper this year, but Michael isn't isn't a guarantee either.
-
Which Benjamin? How many WR/RB/Felx do you start?
-
Workout canceled. No worries.
Probably couldn't fit his fat a$$ into his football pants.
-
With White out I think Jeffery has a good chance at becoming the borderline WR1/2 that he was drafted as. Hoyer isn't a bad fantasy QB and was the primary QB for Hopkins last year, so clearly he doesn't kill receivers values. If you look at the first three weeks for Jeffery, the only thing missing are TDs. If he had one or two in the first three weeks he's right where he should be.
-
Manning doesn't trust Perkins to block. Until that changes Perkins isn't worth much.
-
My general feeling is that if your team is still alive when he comes back, you're probably doing just fine at running back without him. He wasn't very productive when healthy, and from what I've read he's back in week 15 or 16 at the earliest, assuming he comes back in game shape and takes the lead role right back. That's a long time to have a dead weight on your bench, that has no promise of being healthy or productive this year.
-
Vikings D to outscore Diggs by two.
-
Alshon hasn't been great but really the only thing missing the first three weeks are touchdowns. I still see him as a WR2 with WR1 upside some weeks.
-
I'll jump on the FU to the KC defense and throw one to the cancel out theory. Up by 15 and I had Brown and he had Ben. Now I'm down by 1 and need the Vikings D to outscore Diggs by two.
-
PPR/Standard? Riddick's value is extremely different in these two. I wouldn't want him as an RB2 in standard but in PPR it's not bad. If you do it, I would try to flip Walker for another low RB2 or high ceiling backup RB. That being said, not sure its a risk worth taking as TE really isn't a position of need for you.
-
I wouldn't give up Brown for that. Forte would have to be a on average around a 5-7 point upgrade over my current starting running back, in order for that deal to work out in my favor. It's hard to imagine that.
-
Sounds like you pretty much have it figured out for yourself. Just go with what you think is best. If you're wrong at least it was your call, and you get another shot next week. You're thinking is logical, but I could come up with reasons to start or to sit each player.
-
Depends on your RB situation. If you're set at RB I'd put Henry and his ceiling above Stewart. If you need a guy that can contribute something to your lineup in the near future, I'd go Stewart ahead of Henry. Henry could win you a championship.
Martin
Stewart/Henry
-
Tough. Most experts seem to believe that Cooks is the clear #1, but when healthy I'm not so sure Snead isn't the top guy there. I see Snead being more consistent, with Cooks having a few bigger games.
1a. Cooks
1b. Snead
3. Thomas
4. Coleman
-
Vikings D is available in my league, how much faab would you guys spend?
-
I'd pass on the deal. I think long and short term Gordon has more value than Ingram. M. Wallace doesn't move the needle much. I might do it if Shepard was involved, but I would still think about it.
-
Just traded him for Rawls in one league. Deep bench so I can hold the starter for Seattle
You sure a healthy Rawls is still the starter there?
-
Up by 4, with Brees and M. Bryant, up against his Julio. I feel good, but this game should have a lot of fantasy points up for grabs so who knows how it all pans out.
-
Any idea how this situation pans out after Rawls comes back? Don't know if now is the time to sell, or if this is what we've been waiting for, one of them to grab the starting job and not look back.
-
I picked up D Washington of Detroit last week. He didn't have a break out game but looked much better than Riddick running the ball. I expect DWash of Detroit to become the 1st and 2nd down back and Theo to be relegated back to 3rd down and recving back.
I see it becoming a game flow/game plan dependant back field. Similar to a Hill/Bernard situation.
-
I don't know how you do it, but for me fantasy football is all about statistical probability. Vegas math. Week to week highly variable. Over time much more predictable. It may be one of the three weeks he outscores me and I need a big week out of an unusual suspect. Statistically, chances are it's not one of those week. A zero more likely decreases my chances than a big game increases my chances. I won't take a risk when more times than not, I don't need to. It's not a guarantee and I could lose but more times than not I don't..
-
It's the same thing as weighing high floor vs high ceiling.
Charles sims
in FFToday Board
Posted
Is Jacquizz the next guy in line? Hard to see that guy as a primary ball carrier even if only for one game.