Jump to content

jonmx

Members
  • Content Count

    6,867
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Everything posted by jonmx

  1. jonmx

    Timmy’s thread for general discussion

    Because it is. Big Tech hires a boatload of 'ex'-intelligence officials who make sure big tech companies censor information in a way which uniformly censors speech across the major platforms to promote corrupt elitist authoritarian rule. Much of the government censorship is done covertly because it is ilegal.
  2. jonmx

    Timmy’s thread for general discussion

    I don't think the oral arguments in case went well and both sides seemed confused at what they wanted. They seemed to be stuck on the health care aspect where the government has a case for a compelling interest. They did a poor job of showing government coercion. I doubt if it is really a win for either side, as I expect them to come up with a test that neither side will be happy with. I hope they do put together a solid majority supporting free speech though. Empowering the government to suppress "misinformstion" is not a government you want to live under..
  3. Because I upset their echo chamber. They could not take being exposed and having their asnine worldview beaten to a pulp. Their collective heads exploded and they became nasty little bitches.
  4. If I could go back to JFK, I would. He was the first president to really understand the corrupt and evil nature of the deep state establishment and tried to reign it in before it killed him. Reagan was the best at bringing the nation together, but he lacked understanding just how corrupt our government was. He was focused on the commies, which he did a good job against. Trump is the best on that list for today because at this point there are two sides with irreconcilable differences, the freedom-loving citizens versus the corrupt institutions which have grown way too powerful. We are headed towards a police state. Trump is not nearly as smart as JFK was, but is currently our best hope. I still see Trump has too many backstabbing establishment types around him. He does not completely get it.
  5. jonmx

    Kyle Rittenhouse - Criminal or Hero?

    That was the narrative for several days before they figured out he was Hispanic. Squisy is the biggest dumbfuk.
  6. jonmx

    Kyle Rittenhouse - Criminal or Hero?

    There was a witness who saw Martin on top of Zimmerman whaling away on his face and who would not stop despite pleas. There is 9-11 calls where you can hear Zimmerman screaming for his life aa he was being beaten. There were injuries on Zimmerman's head and face where he was beaten and pounded into the ground. There were grass stains over the back of Zimmerman. Martin's fists were swollen from besting on Zimmerman's face. Ballistics show a close range shot with Martin on top. Even without Zimmerman testifying, he was found to have acted in self-defense by overwhelming evidence. You are the most clueless jackass on the internet.
  7. jonmx

    Kyle Rittenhouse - Criminal or Hero?

    No, I am a fan of justice. A man has a right to defend himself against an attacker, as proven in court by witnesses, ballistics, testimony and physical evidence. I despise low-life bastards such as yourself, who wish to lynch an innocent man by abusing the justice system.. Whether Zimmerman was a dirt bag has no bearing on the case. You are such a lying piece of crap who still hasn't owned up to your lies from yesterday. You don't possess an ounce of dignity.
  8. jonmx

    Timmy’s thread for general discussion

    Nothing infuriates me more than unequal treatment with two grossly different standards. When your side spews hate or uses rhetoric such as 'fight', you endlessly excuse them and insist their intentions are good and they would never mean to harm anyone. But yet when conservstives say the same thing, you assume the most vile motives. It absolutely blows my mind that you being in commercial real estate, with numerous clients who submit financial statements to banks with estimated values of their properties, can in anyway justify a $454 million judgement for putting a value on a property which is higher than its tax assessment and could not care less what an actually appraiser says. The state just arbitrarily penalizes a political opponent an obscene amount of cash to destroy an individual over something that did not harm a soul, and you can not admit that there is something wrong with that. Our government has become insanely corrupt and people like you pretend nothing is wrong because it is Trump they are doing it do. You are no better than someone watching a lynching and not saying anything. This is why I am getting pissed off at society. Our country has lost all the values of what made America great. Today, we are no better than Russia. But elite establishment of this country only wants to demonize those who point how corrupt they have become.
  9. jonmx

    Timmy’s thread for general discussion

    You lying POS. Trump has never called for violence. Of course you are so dumb, you seriously believe that when Trump tells his supporters to go march in peace, it is some kind of call to take up arms and overthrow the government. BLOODBATH: Substantial losses by many people, as in a mass termination of employment or widespread financial loss. Trump talks of Chinese building car factories in Mexico in an attempt to destroy our auto industry, and if he was president he would slap 100 percent tariffs on those cars. Very next sentence he says if he losses, it will be a bloodbath. No f-ucking honest human being would interpret that as meaning a literal bloodbath, but the common definition of the word of mass termination and financial loss in our auto industry. You know you are lying plain as day, but yet you continue because your tiny little brain has been filled with hate of Trump from your brainwashing lying media. Between you and Squisy, it is like arguing with damn cult members.
  10. Here is page 3 of Hur's report as released by the DOJ, you fuktard dumbass. Can you not read? There are hundreds of references to material marked SECRET and Top Secret throughout the report including this: Marked classified documents about Afghanistan. These documents from fall 2009 have classification markings up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level. They were found in a box in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage that contained other materials of great personal significance to him and that he appears to have personally used and accessed. The marked classified documents were found along with drafts of the handwritten 2009 Thanksgiving memo Mr. Biden sent President Obama in a last-ditch effort to persuade him not to send additional troops to Afghanistan. https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf
  11. 1. You are wrong on what Top Secret means. 2. You are wrong about Biden not having Top Secret documents. These are indisputable facts you are materially full of crap on. And you are the only one not admitting what a dumfuk you are. Typical libtard, accusing others of exactly what you do.
  12. jonmx

    Cryptocurrency

    ??? I am up over 15 percent this week.
  13. No you lying idiot bastard retard. I said top secret = top secret which all Hillary, Donald, and Joe had. That all had top secret information, including Joe which I 100 percent proved by quoting Bur's report, which you are so f-ing dumb you don't comprehend what that is. Nuclear secrets are just a sub-classification of Top Secret which was created by Exectutive Order and has no bearing on the legal classifications and punishment under the law.
  14. You are a total dumfuk. I quoted the actual source of the DOJ investigation which the media reports on. Only a dumfuk retard would believe the media over what is clearly stated in the actual investigation report. Seriously, you can not be this stupid. And then you are 100 percent clueless on what classifications levels are and mean. It is not even worth discussion with a total retard. It is worse than having to educate a preschooler.
  15. jonmx

    Cryptocurrency

    SOL...$202. Solana Dethrones Ethereum, SOL Co-Founder Breaks Silence U.Today Solana Dethrones Ethereum, SOL Co-Founder Breaks Silence Mar 17, 202407:18 EDT SOLUSD In a remarkable turn of events, Solana has achieved a significant milestone by surpassing Ethereum and other EVM-based Layer-2 solutions in 24-hour volume, as reported by DefiLlama. With Solana's total chain volume standing at $3.654 billion, compared to Ethereum's $2.397 billion, the platform has emerged as the undisputed leader in blockchain transactions.
  16. Are you seriously this f-ing stupid? Not a single thing you cut and pasted make your point. I have worked with classified information for decades. There are three levels of classification by law...classified, secret, and top secret. All Top Secret material is classified as causing the same level of danger if disclosed. None of the laws distinguish a different level of crime for nuclear. The FBI released pictures of the Trump raid and made the nuclear innuendo for political spin for headlines so retards such as you and Tim eat it up like the good little bootlickers you are. With Biden the media works to try to downplay the Top Secret info that he had floating around his house for many years. But if you read Bur's report there are 177 mentions of Top Secret. The second one on page 3 of his report is below: Marked classified documents about Afghanistan. These documents from fall 2009 have classification markings up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level. They were found in a box in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage that contained other materials of great personal significance to him and that he appears to have personally used and accessed.
  17. Nice cut and paste job of the Democratic talking points. But they make no legal sense and are just pure spin. A Top Secret document has information which could cause exceptionally grave injury to the national interest if disclosed. It does not matter if they allegedly contain nuclear secrets or whatever. It makes no difference from a legal perspective as their classification is identical. Bill, Don, Joe, and Hillary all had TS information. Bill and Don were the only ones who were authorized to take it. Joe and Hillary had no legal authority to possess such material. Hillary material were especially bad because they were on a server connected to the internet, which was known to have been hacked multiple times. Hillary recklessly disclosed Top Secret information to foreign enemies. Joe, much like Don, had Top Secret information in his house. Some of it was locked in his garage, somewhat secured, but a ton of it was also scattered throughout his house in open areas. Don's material was more protected. Don's conversation with attorney's is simply asking for legal advise. Asking your attorney's how far you can take it is not illegal. It is seeking privileged and protected advise. That is what attorney's are for.
  18. OMG, the cesspool of lying leftist idiots protected by bootlicking moderators called me wrong! I think I am going to cry.
  19. Squisy had credibility? When the fuk was this?
  20. Hey dipshit, I know the facts of the cases. I don't need proof from you, just state in your idiotic opinion of what you think the facts are and what made Trump's worse.
  21. Yeah, they are not. Hillary and Biden were not POTUS when they took unauthorized classified documents and had no protection under the Presidential Records Act. The case against Trump is far far weaker as Trump had authority to take as personal records of any and all documents he wanted.
  22. Florida jury will be very difficult to stack full of anti-Trump freaks. But still, a judge needs to evaluate if this a politically motivated prosecution which is being unequally applied. That is not a question for a jury.
  23. Mindlessly repeating leftist propaganda by throwing out big meaningless words works well around a friendly crowd. Once challenge they get angry because their rhetoric does not stand up to scrutiny. This is why they angerly protest any speakers with opposing views.
  24. Moving on to the nonsense down in Florida, Judge Cannon expresses concerns that the prosecution of Trump seems arbitrary in light of non-presecutions of Biden and the Clintons for similar violation. Also, like Trump, Bill Clinton took classified records and declared them personal records and the courts ruled that no one had authority to question his discretion under the Presidential Records Act.. This supposed slam-dunk case is resting on shakey grounds and may get tossed before the case gets off the ground.
×