jonmx

Fani and Wade are going to prison. The evidence is coming out that they both contacted Terrance and likely threatened him. Perjury and tampering with witnesses. Ironically racketeering could be added would be a fun twist.

$68.5...it is on a roll.

I have a masters degree, I don't have a sister and the closest relative I focked was your momma.

Urban America leffists are brainwashed retards.

White rural conservative America is f-ing sick and tired of being denigrated by the establishment media 24/7. And then for some bootlicking blowhards to dismiss all of their grievances as whining passes us off more. Whities need to shut-up about being targetted by federal agencies. Whities need to shut-up about having their views constantly censored. Whities need to shut-up about unequal treatment in education. Whities need to bow down and admit they are all racist bastards who everything they have was on the backs of minorities. Yes massa Timmy, we will shut-up and let the massive authoritarian bureaucracies and their corporate minions walk all over us and degrade us. If you think that rant is all BS, well you are clueless at what is going on in America. Not one word above is some theory, it is absolute reality for a hundred million Americans.

Judges have immunity over official acts. Federal employees have immunity over official acts. And President's certainly have immunity official acts. What the panel ruled is somehow this immunity expires on January 20th, and from that point on, President's are open to criminal prosecution for stuff they did in office. That is an utterly retarded ruling that has zero chance to be upheld. What will most likely happen is the Supreme Court will rule the President's do have immunity for official acts and will throw the case back to the lower courts to determine if Trump's acts fell under the umbrella of official acts. The interesting part will be how far-reaching the immunity will be and clarification on what an official act is. The media was not happy that the Supreme Court took up the case and the language of the question that the court asked to be answered. The question highly suggests that Trump's act could be an official act, which is an issue which all the lower courts did not even address. I may not be a lawyer, but the above summary is a far better analysis of the case and probable outcome than anything you are reading. What your experts are saying is total crap and the appellate court ruling was highly deficient because it avoided addressing the most basic issue of the case.

I am glad you were at least not on the plantation for that one. But there were several states under court rulings and the color of law who were throwing Trump off the ballot and many experts in the media supporting these efforts. Now just wait until the Supreme Court overturns (at least partially) the immunity issue. The appellate court ruling by the three-judge panel is universally supported by experts calling it an iron-clad ruling which can not be overturned. Again the experts are full of crap, but I guess my perfect record on calling these court cases is just some wild conspiracy nonsense.

It is not the actual slavery or Holocaust where the similarity is, it is the endless demonization and belittlement of the abuses they get which completely dehumanizing them. You may find it ridiculous, but that is why Trump is going to get 100 million votes and be the next President. The media's assertion which you by into is that Trump voters are driven by misinformation and racism. That is a moronic characterization of what is actually driving Trump's support.

What is offensive about the analogy is how close to the truth it is. You openly crapped on Tea Partiers for a decade and now it is MAGA folks who get crapped on 24/7 by the media. Quite frankly they are sick of this hatred they have to endure every time they turn on the TV.

You confuse obvious facts with irony. Your blind obedience to the elitist brainwashing is clear to anyone outside your cult.

Even back in the day, there were far more white trash dirt poor whites in the south than plantation owning slave-owners. The real enemy are the rich elitists and their puppet three-letter government minions who abuse citizens.

MSNBC was just discussing how rural white Americans are our biggest threat to Democracy. Really, American voters are the biggest threat to Democracy, what kind of bizarro logic is that? Just imagine some conservative media discussing how 'urban blacks are the greatest threat to democracy'. You could create an identical laundry list....highest crime rates, most likely to loot, most violent protests, highest racial bigotry....with much better factual backing than they provided. And that would universally be accepted as gross bigotry. But yet white/conservatives Americans are demonized in a way very remimencient to how Nazi's demonized jews. And people like Tim have endlessly been brainwashed to the bigotry for over a decade, to the point where it is even righteous to have this hatred towards white conservative Americans. Who cares if they are massively censored? Who cares if the are wrongfully imprisoned? Who cares if they are endlessly demonized in the media? Who cares if they are discriminated against in educational opportunities and in the workplace? It may not be the exact same as how Nazi's did to Jews or the deep south did to blacks, but it is certainly its kissing cousin.

$65k.....the market is rising today..70k will be breached early this week. SHIB and DOGE have been super hot. Meme coins might have a good run for a bit. For some applications being popular might be more important than being good.

She is entertaining, but the WNBA product is not engulfing. There will be an initial boost, but in the end it will not make the league as the WNBA as a product is not that good. If she ends up in the finals, the networks will over-hype it. It will get some viewers, but after that, no one will care again.

Wait til the Supreme Court rule Trump has immunity. It will be suicide watch time.

100 percent incorrect. The FBI knew about this guy for years. And when he got on the Blaze staff and was doing more visible reporting on Januarg 6th, that is when the FBI started to pressure the guy. He has been living in fear of an FBI raid for over two years. All he did on January 6th was reporting. Your fallback assumption Is always the negro is guilty. Even when there is videotape clearly showing innocent, you believe guilt because of how heavily programmed you are.

BS. Not the reporters for the New York Times or New Yorker. Of course you never see anything wrong with treating negros differently.

Steve Baker was told by the FBI a few days before they would go to his house and arrest him, much like they did another journalist Steven Horn about a year ago. They told him to wear loose clothing because they were going to put him in an orange jump suit and hand and leg shackles. Steven Horn is still in prison on misdemeanor charges and Steve Baker was terrified he would suffer the same fate. Apparently there was enough of a conservstive media and Congressional backlash, that the FBI backed off and allowed him to turn himself in. They did put him in arm and leg shackles for his court room appearance, but did not pit him in an orange jump suit. As far as crazy, he did nothing except report on January 6th and entered the building as a reporter, much like other journalist did. Those associated with organizations like the New York Times or the New Yorker have never been question or arrested. The New York Times reporter actually entered the building through a broken window, Baker entered through an open door. You just love your two-tiered system of justice. One of the conservatives (the negros) and one for the bootlickers.

Tim has no comment on the DOJ/FBI arresting dozens of joirnalists. Our record the last few years is worst than Putins. Really, we need to send 20 FBI agents to Steve Bakers house (of The Blaze) and put him in an orange jump suit and shackles for doing the exact same thing that reporters from the New York Times and New Yorker did. Oh, but the New York Times doesn't care, so it is a non-issue. You only f-ing retort is that my factual assertion must not be true. What a crock.

1. Lol... no, that does not make it far worse. Trump lawyers were negotiating with them, and the FBI decided to raid them anyways. Trump had a right to many of those docs through the presidential records act which may become part of his library. Now Hillary Clinton destroyed her hard drives before the FBI could get them. A clear act of obstruction. Clinton also had her records hacked, so there was a clear breech. Not one of Trump documents fell into Chinese or Russian hands. There is no legitimate case that Trump was worse. 2. There is nothing illegal about Trump asking the governor to look for fraudulent votes. In fact that is a legitimate role of the president in upholding laws if he believes there was election fraud. Unlike how the media spins it, Trump did not ask for fraudulent votes. He was looking to find miscounted or illegal votes, exactly like Gore was in 2000. 3. The Jan. 6th case will get thrown out. A three judge panel of Democrats already ruled this week that the 'interfering with an official act' law does not apply to this. The $454 million fine was a 100 percent corrupt ruling as I have explained to you numerous times, but you really don't give a fuk. All you care is Trump is guilty. You have disagreed with me on many legal cases over the years, and your experts are 0 for 20 in these.

Wasting your breath. Until the New York Times agrees, Tim will not even entertain the points. The idea of a 'serious discussion' is first you must accept the facts as the elitist establishment frames them. Democrats never have evil motives, but are the fighters of truth and justice. Republicans associate with racists and all their facts are lies. And that is what Tim's idea of a 'serious discussion' is.

At least you realize this is not about Democracy, but putting out a better deep state puppet.

You know this is already baked into the poll numbers which has Trump winning ever swing state. But I won't argue. Biden is a great candidate. I love Biden.

I just laid out all the details which accurately reflect the ruling and yet you refuse to acknowledge it. Your problem as always is you completely rely upon authority to do your thinking. You refuse to look at facts and think for yourself. That is precisely why I call modern Democrats bootlickers for the authoritarian bastards.

Ignorant is a better term. You choose to believe sources who are in the business of brainwashing the masses. Nothing I asserted in this thread is false. Your understanding of the cases against Trump are based upon lies.