jonmx

Here is what you said: "He or anyone has the right to do this. They have no power to make it happen. It’s a PR thing." Everyone is reading this as He is Hunter and They are congress. But you seem to claiming what you meant was that He = They = Hunter.

Trump Jr. was not given a choice. No one is given a choice. Trump Jr. had to comply with the behind the door questioning or go to jail. Hunter needs to do the same. The GOP needs to grow a spine and throw his butt in prison like the Democrats threatened.

You just did. You think the Democrats supeonaing Trump Jr. for closed door testimony under the threat of prison was awesome, but to insist Hunter Biden provides the same level of cooperation is ridiculous. One rule for thee another rule for me is the left's motto, and you bootlick for it.

It is the exact same thing the Democrats did. You fockers could not have your heads any further up your arse. You bootlickers want different rules for your authoritarian bastards than you do you the freedom loving Americans.

Bank records, emails, checks, video, audio recordings. They even have hundreds of Joe Biden's pseudonyms he used in alias emails in over 70,000 pages of emails between Hunter and his buddies linking Joe to all this criminal activity. Oh yes, I know, they are all just loan repayments. But these loan repayments are stacking up to larger and larger amounts every day and there is no corresponding records of Hunter ever recieving the loans. There are only records of Hunter paying these 'loans' back to Joe. Those are very weird loans.

They will you idiot. Trump jr. was supeonaed twice and forced to testify behind close doors and threatened with prison if he did not comply. This is where we are at in the investigation. Public hearings come later. You could not be any dumber to not understand the ploy.

You can not be this stupid. I mean I know the media preaches this line of manure 24/7, but can you not see for yourself that this is a lie?

Tall radio...you still leaving in the 80's? You ought to update your talking points since you suck at actually address facts.

If you think Hunter is going to answer any questions you are dumb as fock. You are getting played, but no matter how many times Joe and Hunter make you look like idiots, you come back for more.

The whole reason for the latest charges against Hunter is so he can plead the 5th to any testimony. The idea Hunter is actually going to answer meaningful questions is 100 percent a scam. Damn, you fockers are stupid as hell.

If the legislature understood the ruling, they could prohibit corporations from contributing to super pacs. They just don't understand they can. The reason Citizens United won is because they were making protected political speech on behalf of individuals who have 1st Admendment rights. Corporate interests do not possess such rights.

It is not the corporation which has free speech, but the individuals who pooled their money together for the sole purpose of providing a message who have free speech. Citizens United was not speech on behalf of a corporate interest, but was a tool for individuals to speak through. The simple fact that they were using a corporation, does not remove their right to be heard. If you really advocate for and support free speech, you would get it. If this were IBM, it would have lost, assuming the law was written correctly. But McCain-Fiengold was written too broadly and encroached upon free speech. The ruling protected lobby groups, not for-profit corporations.

It is obvious the New York fraud case against Trump is itself a complete fraud. Even with a rabid Trump-hating judge making absurd ruling after absurd ruling, and a rabid incompetent Trump-hating prosecutor constantly lying, there is little chance anything will come of this case. The banks have testified they were happy with the deals and made lots of money and Trump was never in default. The banks have also said that they conservatively value properties and their opinions often lowers the values from Financials statements when making loan determinations. There were no victims of this alledged crime and there are even experts who said Trump's financial statements had no errors and they even valued the properties much higher than Trump's estimates. Besides all that, most of the case fails because of statue of limitations. Now I don't doubt this highly corrupt Trump-hating judge will find an excuse to convict Trump, there is zero chance it is upheld. All this does is prove Trump was a victim of malicious prosecution and is being deprived 1st Amendment rights by unconstitutional gag orders in the mist of an election. More and more the left is being exposed as corrupt authoritarian bastards who massively abuse their power and are the enemy of all the values which made this country great.

I understand you get educated by watching the media, but really that is one of thousands of pieces of propaganda they feed you which is not true. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood#:~:text=The Citizens United majority opinion,or an association of people. The Citizens United majority opinion makes no reference to corporate personhood or the Fourteenth Amendment, but rather argues that political speech rights do not depend on the identity of the speaker, which could be a person or an association of people. You are welcome.

That is not exactly what the ruling says. That is a popular mischaracterization.

That is because the media which you adore hides about 50 percent of the pertinent facts. What your media tells you are the Twitter files are a nothingburger. The truth is the Twitter files exposed close ties between government agencies and social media censorship. We are not talking about hate speech. We are talking about posters who take positions against the government narrative on a whole bunch of topics.

Tim, you know damn well the government provided spreadsheets on a daily basis to all the social media giants demanding that thousands of posts be removed and certain posters banned. The social media platforms also recievd special liability protections under the theory that they are a public square free speech platform. When they get into the business of targeting specific political viewpoints, that violates the principle on which those protections were granted.

Not at all. The real immediate threat for a totalitarian government is within the current leftist establishment which has taken over all the executive branch agencies. Trump can't really do crap because all the real power rests in the three letter agencies and they will not cooperate. We need to defange all those organizations and put some real checks and balances in place which holds those employees accountable if they abuse the rights of citizens. Including the DOJ with their malicious prosecutions.

They are state creations. You can establish special rules for corporations which treat different corporation types differently. The problem with the campaign finance reform law was that even if it was an individual, that law would have made that ad illegal. McCain-Feingold was a terrible anti-speech law which needed to be struck down. The reasoning was poor and it would have been better if they took up a different case.

It was the correct descion, not for profit corporations, but for non-profits who want to express an opinion.

They are corporations, they are creations of the states. You can put restrictions on them.

Biden is the figurehead of the corrupt state. The corrupt state fears Trump. That is the difference.

Our executive branch has way too much unchecked power and we are dangerously close to slipping into a totalitarian state lead by establishment leftists. They hold most of the power the US has.

What narrative are you talking about? The narrative of watching the entire sequence of events???? Or the narrative that your 'universal coverage' provided which were just snippets that put the cops in the worst possible light possible. It is your side who is lying through their teeth by the massive amount of factual evidence (body cam footage, original autopsy reports, actual training guides the police were given) that is omitted that skews the facts. You are lied to so much, but yet you still trust every word they feed you. There is not a single item in that documentary which is not 100 percent verifiably true. Just because the lying bastards in the media hide that evidence does it mean it is false. It is video of the event. How can you be so dumb?

Because the judge was a leftwing activist who disallowed key pieces of evidence and a jury who was barricaded in the middle of a violent mob threatening to burn down the place if a guilty verdict was not given.