jonmx

My bad. The Chinese government operates much like the US deep state government. It is not the actual guilty players who get convicted and destroyed but those whistleblowers who shed light on the corruption deep inside the workings of the evil state. It is these poor souls who most certainly had their organs harvested. How China’s Response to the COVID-19 Lab Leak Theory Means It Will Rumble On and On

Fauci loved Bat Lady long time. Wuhan Lab’s ‘Bat Lady’ Visited Fauci, NIH in 2017, Emails Reveal Scientists at the center of the “lab leak” controversy visited Dr. Anthony Fauci’s institute at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 2017 to discuss their research — just months before NIH lifted a pause on high-risk virology, and two years before a novel coronavirus emerged near their lab in Wuhan. Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) Senior Scientist Shi Zhengli passed a security screening to visit National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) staffers in June 2017, where she gave a presentation about novel coronaviruses, emails obtained by U.S. Right to Know show. Shi is known internationally as the “Bat Lady” for her work with bats and their coronaviruses. Though ostensibly a civilian lab, the WIV has conducted research projects “for defensive and biosecurity needs of the military” since at least 2017, according to U.S. intelligence. EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S. research organization, partnered closely with the WIV, subcontracting NIAID funding to Shi’s lab, and arranged the meeting. “Zhengli and I will do a double act,” EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak, Ph.D. said of their June 2017 meeting with NIAID’s Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Respiratory Diseases. Fauci himself met with Daszak four months later, in October 2017. The subject of the meeting may have been an outbreak of an animal coronavirus called Swine Acute Diarrheal Syndrome. By December 2017, NIH had resumed funding for gain-of-function research that generates new viruses in the lab following a three-year pause and debate about the possibility that such research could cause a pandemic. Daszak arranged the meetings at NIH with the program officer overseeing his research there, Erik Stemmy, who managed coronavirus research at NIAID’s Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. U.S. Right to Know obtained the emails in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the NIH. Together with other emails obtained through FOIA, the email demonstrates the awareness of Fauci and his top aides of the novel coronavirus research underway at the pandemic’s epicenter. Fauci did not mention this 2017 meeting with Daszak in a 2022 sworn deposition with the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana. “I don’t even remember meeting him, but I do know that someone showed me a picture at a meeting where somebody said, here, take a picture with him,” Fauci said of Daszak. “But that is not unusual, when you go to a scientific meeting, you run into hundreds of people. And I believe that this Dr. Daszak is one of the people that I almost — well, I did run into him because I believe I’ve seen a photograph of he and I together at a meeting.” NIAID did not respond to questions. The revelation comes just days before Fauci will give sworn testimony to congressional investigators. Fauci is slated to testify in a closed-door transcribed interview on Jan. 8 and 9. Shi’s visit “Our Chinese Co-investigator, Zhengli Shi from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, will be visiting the US in June to give a talk at a conference here. I’d really like to come and visit you and your colleagues at NIH with her while she’s here,” Daszak wrote on April 24, 2017. Shi’s security screening to visit the NIAID was not included in the documents provided to U.S. Right to Know, and it’s not clear what it entailed. A May 24, 2017, email shows Daszak seeking a security clearance for Shi as well as Peng Zhou, an associate professor at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, ahead of a June visit to the U.S. The title of a joint talk by Daszak and Shi was billed as “SARS [severe acute respiratory syndrome], MERS [Middle East respiratory syndrome] and the risk of novel viral emergence from bats,” the email shows. A June 16, 2017, email shows an EcoHealth Alliance staffer sharing security screening information with Stemmy. A June 29, 2017, email from Daszak suggests that Chinese collaborators on the project were present at the NIAID. “Thanks for hosting us as NIAD [sic] today … nice to have a chance to introduce our collaborators to you personally,” Daszak said. It’s unclear whether ties between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese military factored into Shi’s security screening. Highly redacted U.S. Department of State cables obtained by U.S. Right to Know last year show that the U.S. possesses “cyber evidence” of military “shadow labs” at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. A 2021 State Department fact sheet stated that “despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution,” it has conducted classified research on behalf of the Chinese military “since at least 2017.” The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) researchers conducted virological research at the Wuhan lab, and the lab’s civilian scientists have worked alongside scientists associated with the PLA, according to a declassified assessment released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence last year. Biosecurity concerns The emails raise yet more questions about the rigor of U.S. regulations on virology experiments that may generate new pandemic viruses, including how and why high-risk research was outsourced to a rival nation. The year before, in 2016, Stemmy and Daszak carved out an exemption to a pause on gain-of-function research, allowing EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology to move forward with research that generated new SARS-related coronaviruses with enhanced transmissibility and virulence, according to reporting by The Intercept. EcoHeath would run afoul of even these ad hoc rules with gain-of-function experiments that enhanced the transmissibility and virulence of SARS-related coronaviruses, including a tweak that increased the viral load of a virus by up to 10,000 times, NIH acknowledged in 2021. Last month, U.S. Right to Know revealed that Daszak misled the Pentagon about planned research to generate new coronaviruses with furin cleavage sites, a genetic motif shown to make viruses more transmissible. SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is the only sarbecovirus with a furin cleavage site. A formal research proposal submitted by Daszak and Shi in 2018 stated that this research would occur in the U.S. in a biosafety level three lab, a relatively rigorous level. But private drafts indicated this language was designed to placate grantmakers at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and that key tests would in fact occur in Wuhan at a biosafety level two lab, an inadequate biosafety level, apparently to save on costs. What Fauci knew Fauci has dismissed the relevance of this research to the worst pandemic in a century. He falsely claimed in Senate testimony in 2021 that NIAID did not fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan. In an interview last year with Australian media, Fauci downplayed the significance of NIAID’s funding to EcoHealth and its collaborators in Wuhan. But emails obtained through FOIA show that Fauci was alerted by Jan. 27, 2020, that his institute had funded “among the biggest players in coronavirus work,” namely EcoHealth Alliance and its collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Fauci had been alerted by Feb. 1, 2020, that this research included gain-of-function experiments. In the very early hours of Feb. 1, 2020, Fauci dispatched his aide Hugh Auchincloss to investigate whether his institute had funded the gain-of-function collaboration. It had.

I am glad I have invested less than an hour of my life to this show.

Wonder why we don't know all these details of how much and what projects were funded? Because the SOB has lied and covered everything up. When know for a fact he conspired with co-workers to lie about the origins of Covid and we know he perpetrated the lie of its natural origins. We kmow the Cinese punished those involved at Wuhan, probably with death. Oh but hey, Fauci just constantly lies and is cagey with all of his answers because he is not guilty. The bastard somehow built a wealth of well over $10 million on a civil servant salary. The dude has a whole history of shady activities which has greatly benefited big Pharma at the expense of the safety of Americans. But let's give the lying MFer the benefit of the doubt because we are a bunch of stupid effing bootlicking idiots who love corrupt authoritarian bastards. Fauci is our MFing hero!.

That is incredible. So Trump is making SNL great again!

You retards are too fuking stupid to engage anymore.

You do realize it is only retard leftist who buy into men have menstrual cycles. Real men know that is not a thing

Actually MAGA does not. Leftist propaganda is everywhere and it is impossible for MAGA to avoid it. It is only retarded leftists who can easily live in an echo chamber and avoid being exposed to rationale thinking.

Seems like you are most bullish on SOLs upside. I am anxious to see what Trump does to make crypto investing more attractive from a tax perspective. I would not make any big trades with big profits until after the years end. If Trump really makes crypto profits tax-free, that would be huge. It would make the crypto Roth account as meaningless, but that is ok.

It is asinine to call women lying as rare. As crappy as male human beings can be, women can be crappy too and it certainly ain't rare.

Of course you do because you have 100 percent bought into the idiocracy. It is the most narrow-minded cult authoritarian movement in our nation's history. Virtually everything they accuse MAGA of, they are the ones guilty of. I really hope through whistleblowers and exposing confidential reports inside the FBI and CIA, it is exposed how much censorship and brainwashing propaganda our government has been involved in.

I sincerely hope this line of stupidity ends up in the trashbin of history. This retarded woke elitist idealogy has been extremly divisive and harmful and it the true source of the majority of hate in this country.

And the above proves, it is a fuking waste of time to engage with those bootlicking brainwashed idiots when they ask for links.

Don't tell me anything. You are a buffoon who are stuck in this narrative that believes whatever the propaganda establishment media tells you.

1. Whether Blesey Ford actually believed it or not, it was absolutely a false claim based upon all the people she claimed was there including her friend denied it. 2.. Woman who falsely accused DPS trooper of rape won't face additional charges 3. Long Island woman who made false rape claims denied probation reduction 4..University of Virginia Rape Case Shows Impacts of False Allegations 5..Drake sues woman who allegedly made false pregnancy, rape claims 6. Fullerton bar suing woman who claims she was drugged at bar and later raped 7. Teen Who Made False Rape Claims Now Faces Felony Charges 8..Five high school 'mean girls' targeted boy with false accusations of sexual assault 9..Eleanor Williams jailed over false rape claims The allegations against Russel Brand were politically-driven BS are exaggerations at best. Stormy Daniels ever-changing story is now wrapped in language which insinuates Trump raped her are BS. ABC just paid Trump $16 million for saying Trump raped E. Jean Carroll. ---‐------ About Half of Rape Allegations are False, Research Shows False allegations of rape are believed to be more common than many persons realize. These are the findings of four research studies: A review of 556 rape accusations filed against Air Force personnel found that 27% of women later recanted. Then 25 criteria were developed based on the profile of those women, and then submitted to three independent reviewers to review the remaining cases. If all three reviewers deemed the allegation was false, it was categorized as false. As a result, 60% of all allegations were found to be false.1 Of those women who later recanted, many didn't admit the allegation was false until just before taking a polygraph test. Others admitted it was false only after having failed a polygraph test.2 In a nine-year study of 109 rapes reported to the police in a Midwestern city, Purdue sociologist Eugene J. Kanin reported that in 41% of the cases the complainants eventually admitted that no rape had occurred.3 In a follow-up study of rape claims filed over a three-year period at two large Midwestern universities, Kanin found that of 64 rape cases, 50% turned out to be false.4 Among the false charges, 53% of the women admitted they filed the false claim as an alibi.5 According to a 1996 Department of Justice report, “in about 25% of the sexual assault cases referred to the FBI, ... the primary suspect has been excluded by forensic DNA testing.6 It should be noted that rape involves a forcible and non-consensual act, and a DNA match alone does not prove that rape occurred. So the 25% figure substantially underestimates the true extent of false allegations. And according to former Colorado prosecutor Craig Silverman, “For 16 years, I was a kick-ass prosecutor who made most of my reputation vigorously prosecuting rapists. ... I was amazed to see all the false rape allegations that were made to the Denver Police Department. ... A command officer in the Denver Police sex assaults unit recently told me he placed the false rape numbers at approximately 45%.”7 According to the FBI, about 95,000 forcible rapes were reported in 2004.8 Based on the statements and studies cited above, some 47,000 American men are falsely accused of rape each year. These men are disproportionately African-American.9 Some of these men are wrongly convicted, sentenced, and imprisoned. Even if there is no conviction, a false allegation of rape can “emotionally, socially, and economically destroy a person.”10 Recent national survey conducted by YouGov reveals 8% of Americans report being falsely accused of domestic violence, child abuse, sexual assault,

Then we basically agree. In highly prominent cases it is definitely not rare. Tim has been making this arguement for years. I had this same debate with Tim during the Kavanaugh hearings when after investigation the FBI could find no collaborating facts to support her rape claim. Tim's lone argument to believe her was women have no reason to lie. A year after the case, Ford's own lawyer admitted she only raised the claim because she wanted to save Roe v Wade.

My statements were precisely worded. I add words which modify the meaning which you ignore.

There are millions of unreported cases. There are hundred thousand of reported cases. There are a dozen of prominent cases. HTH.

Move the goal posts??? Not one bit. First off Tim's claim were false allegations are extremely rare, even by your stats that is not true. My assertion is that when there is lots of money or politics involved, those 2-11 percent stats for the typical rape case skyrocket to a much higher number because the reward/motivation is much higher. So the more widely discussed cases will have a much higher level of false allegations than the typical case.

That is how lefties work. 90 percent of their 'fact-checking' is to make a strawman and then ignore the actual argument. It is the prominent politically-motivated stuff the media talks about that are mostly BS. Using his data that between 2-11 percent of rape cases are false, that means out of the roughly 130,000 reported cases that gives us around 2600 to 14,000 falsely reported rape cases each year. That is definitely not 'rare'. The rape accusations which become most prominent are those which a lot of money or a lot of political ramifications are at stake which drives up the motivation to lie about them through the roof.

He is the head of the agency, by his position he has the ability to personally direct spending. I have personally directed millions of dollars of spending and I was never in high level position. NIH admits Fauci lied about funding Wuhan gain-of-function experiments

Fauci controled about $6 billion in funds, but according to Tim he funded nothing even though it is a matter of record thet he did.

What is absurd and extremely damaging is your assertion that these are rare. These are common place and are false almost as much as they are true. Unfortunately millions of cases are swept under the rug, but the cases brought to the public are usually the ones politically motstivated or motivated by personal gain. This is not rare. Putting weight in BS stories like Blasey Ford because she is a women and would not lie in a lame attempt to derail a SC appointment. All the collaborative facts supported Kavanaugh, but you chose to believe her because you are too political and can't think.

That is all well and good. But that is the mindset of some crazy nurse. RFK jr is not anti-vax. RFK jr. believes we need to do research into the modern epidemic of childhood conditions such as autism and find it's root cause.

The team was disbanded and all the players were publicly shamed by the faculty and media. Many had to transfer to other programs but the stain of this was over their heads for years. Losing scholarships and have to change schools is pretty traumatic.