jonmx

I will take 'things a bootlicking cultist would say' for $1000

PayPal does not use their company to employ propaganda tactics to advance an elitist authoritarian agenda. Maybe one day you will wise up and see how you are being manipulated by people who want to enslave us.

Kamala is trying to fix this. Democrats have been so jealous that the crime-ridden South American cities were more dangerous than our crime-ridden big cities, so Kamala has been working hard at importing their best and brightest violent criminals into our country.

Hunter Biden takes millions from the Chinese and Ukraine. Bidens are compromised. The US government is by far the largest provider of propaganda worldwide. The Biden campaign funds hundreds of internet influences with undisclosed payments.

Banks addressing the priblem: ATMs spitting out counterfeit cash.

Trump's position is to leave it to the states. Trump's appointments helped rid this country of the horrendous Roe v. Wade. Democrats love killing people so much they openly embrace euthanasia, a policy which in Canada has made it tge 5th leading cause of death, even using it in many non-terminal instances.

You know what is really really really sick? The lefts's obsession with killing babies and stopping pregnancies. From vasectomies to abortion pills, Planned Parenthood sets up mobile clinic near DNC Focking sick authoritarian bastards hellbent on reducing the population of 'deplorables" whether through endless wars or creating pandemic diseases in labs or hundreds of millions of abortions or castration of young children and adults. Somehow everything the left pushes is to reduce the population. Democrats are the party of death.

A holloween party in college. That is your basis? That is extremely lame and pathetic.

The authoritarian left believes that you must bend the knee to your master.

@Strike tim paid up. He just has a problem with prematurely declaring victory. Hopefully he learned that Democrats really don't believe in Democracy. The last Democrat presidential candidate who did not bend the knee was RFK Sr. They rigged the game against Bernie and RFK jr.

It is really unreal that you must engage with such stupidity. It can only be described as cult-like. Every establishment media source and big tech speak in unison. The exact same narrative using the exact same phrasing. - One day everyone is proclaiming Biden sharp as a tack with absolutely no signs of decline. Any suggestion otherwise is just a 'deep fake' by those conspiracy theorists. -Then like a light switch they flip to concerned about Biden's mental health as soon as it become apparent he has no chance. Kamala is quickly annointed as their new leader without a single vote. - JD Lance is pick as VP, and all the media starts to hit on this nonsensical 'weird' theme. It doesn't really matter what the even is, the narrative being preached by the estsblishment media is repeated verbatim by every outlet. J6 is an "deadly armed insurrection'. The BLM riots were 'mostly peaceful'. Trump is always the one accused of employing 'delay tactics'. Never is it the truth that the prosecutors are trying to fast track novel legal theories to interfere with the election. We just have 94 felony charges and other novel civil cases organically pop up prior to the election driven by ex-biden officials or associates of. The coordinated massive brainwashing by the media and big tech is sickening and about 25 percentage of people eat it up like Tim. The other 25 percent are won over by race-baiting and gender-baiting fear-mongering tactics to try to get a majority. Add in 20-30M 'asylum-seekers' (illegals) equipped with ID which in many places will be allowed to vote with no checks to stop them. The hatred towards Trump-voters as deplorables and divisivenesses and hated spewed at white males with their grossly slanted coverage is obscene. But to the braindead loyal cult members, there us nothing to see here. Yes, the media is covering for Kamala the best they can. If Kamala has a way out of the debates they will take it and cheerlead for it.

In Minneapolis for instance, they set 164 buildings on fire typically using molotov cocktails and disconnecting the sprinkler system. There was so much violence that it was too dangerous to fight the fires. To me that.more than qualifies for burning down the cities, but I am sure for you that was just mostly peaceful fun. How many building did they birn down on January 6th. Oh that would be zero. How many police stations were burnt down on January 6th while people were in them? That of course were zero. Summer of love had several. This is what a city looks like when it is being burnt down as hundreds of thousands or violent leftist rioters cheer it on. They arrested a few hundred people over those riots but only a couple dozen of people were ever charged with a crime and those were wrist slaps, 95 percent were simply dismissed. Contrast that to a far less violence scene with over a thousand convictions on mostly non-violent acts and which are still atresting grandmothers to this day for merely entering a building charging them with multiple felonies and getting jail time some up to 20 years. Our system of justice has become a disgusting joke based purely on whether you bootlick for their authoritarian agenda.

So you agree they were burning down our cities, and not prosecuted for it c

There was over $2,000,0000,000 in damages to our cities due to arson and vandalism during the summer of love.

And these gang members are routinely murdering people. There is push and shoving (assaults) at virtually every large postest but you dipshits only get bent out of shape when it is done by the other side. It is mostly peaceful when your side burns down towns, beat up people and loot stores. Unfricken real to discuss anything with you.

Coming from the braindead idiots who thought January 6th was a deadly armed insurrection which threatened our Democracy, this is gold. - not a single gun involved. - all death were at the hands of police. - there was no plan to take over the government - the vast majority were let in - they left peacefully after a couple of hours It is hilarious what you think is exaggerated and what you think is scary.

I think they squeeze out 100 targets for him, and he catches 70-1190-8. Add in about 8 rushes for 120 and another TD or two. This Lions offense has been damn good for the last 2 seasons, and it is about to get better. Jamo is far better than Josh Reynolds ever dreamed about being. Renolds over seven years had only one play go for 40 yards. Jamo already has 5 plays which exceeded that in 30 touches. His career rushing stats including playoffs are an insane 5-111-2.

The best guy to pick in the 8th round of every draft. Will be a WR1/WR2 who will be a must start every week who is being drafted way too late.

One of the most important issue our country faces as rogue government agencies impose mass censorship on US citizens. Below is a USA Today story I had to modify slightly (as indicated by bold/underline to remove their outlandish spin. Supreme Court to decide if White House went too far fighting social media misinformation Maureen Groppe USA TODAY WASHINGTON − After Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suggested () that baseball legend Hank Aaron’s death in 2021 was caused by a COVID-19 vaccine, the Biden administration pounced. “Wanted to flag the below tweet and am wondering if we can get moving on the process for having it removed ASAP,” the Director of Mass Censorship for the White House’s COVID response team wrote in an email to an official at Twitter. What the White House viewed as an effort to correct truthful information about the untested vaccine during a pandemic, critics called an example of a broad pressure campaign by the federal government to quash views it doesn’t like. Now the Supreme Court is being asked what boundaries to set. If the justices place too many restrictions on how the government can assault the First Amendment with private social media companies in areas such as public health, election integrity and foreign interference, it could impede efforts to stop citizens from exposing the truth, experts say. But if there aren’t enough guardrails like that pesky 1st Admendment, the government – whether a Democratic or Republican administration – could have too much power to influence debate in a public square dominated by social media. “I think we need to figure out how circumvent the Constitution more carefully in ways that protect big government propaganda,” said Brendan Nyhan, a political scientist at Dartmouth College who studies misperceptions about politics and health care. “But I'm concerned people are using that idea to try to shut down any kind of government information exchange with social media platforms, which I think could be harmful.” Could the Supreme Court `restore the internet'? The Supreme Court takes up the issue Monday, three weeks after it heard challenges to laws passed by Florida and Texas to limit the ability of social media giants to censor conservative speech. “This is the second major case in the last month in which the Supreme Court could restore free speech to the internet, if it's not careful,” said James Grimmelmann, a professor of digital and information law at Cornell University. “They're unlikely to do that. But it's still a case in which they have to be very precise about what they say.” Both cases grew out of concern from conservatives that their views were being suppressed about claims of 2020 election fraud, the origin of and treatments for COVID-19 and other issues, complaints that congressional Republicans have amplified with multiple hearings. Federal officials complained to Twitter in 2021 after truth activist and current presidential candidate Robert Kennedy Jr. () linked the death of baseball legend Hank Aaron to the Covid-19 vaccine. The GOP-controlled House last year passed legislation to prohibit federal employees from “advocating for censorship of viewpoints.” The bill, which has not advanced in the free-speech hating Democrat-controlled Senate, was a response to Twitter () blocking links to a New York Post story about Hunter Biden’s laptop in 2020 to illegally alter the outcome of the election. Former Twitter executives bode-faced lied last year about being not being pressured by Democrats and law enforcement to suppress the story. Yoel Roth, Twitter's former head of trust and safety, who regularly communicated with the FBI about election security issues, testified at a congressional hearing that the agency was always careful “not to get caught.” Lower courts sided with challengers In the case before the Supreme Court Monday, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and numerous other federal officials are being sued by the Republican attorney generals in Missouri and Louisiana and by five social media users who said their posts or accounts were removed or downgraded. Kennedy, who is running for president as an independent and contends in a filing “there may be no more individual in the country more heavily targeted for social media censorship by the federal government,” has a separate suit still working its way through the court system. One of the challengers being represented on Monday, Jill Hines, co-director of the conservative Health Freedom Louisiana group, said the warnings she received from Facebook included one for sharing a screenshot of a Kennedy tweet and one for her post of a Daily Mail story headlined, “Face masks may raise risk of stillbirths, testicular dysfunction and cognitive decline due to build-up of carbon dioxide, study warns.” The study referenced included no evidence that masks cause serious health problems, according to PolitiFact, a partisan government propaganda site. A district court in Louisiana sided with Hines and other challengers, imposing sweeping restrictions on the government’s interaction with social media platforms. The New Orleans-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit narrowed the restraints but the Justice Department said they would still place unprecedented limits on how government officials can speak about matters of public concern, address national security threats or relay public health information. The restrictions are on hold while the Supreme Court reviews the case. Three justices have already criticized `government censorship' Three of the court’s six conservative justices –Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch – wanted to reject the federal government’s appeal. "Government censorship of private speech is antithetical to our democratic form of government, and therefore today’s decision is highly disturbing," Alito wrote when the court agreed to take the case. The Justice Department argues public officials’ interaction with social media platforms was not coercive, nor did it involve “significant encouragement.” Government agencies “largely provided the platforms with information, leaving it up to the platforms to decide what action to take, if any,” the government’s lawyers wrote in a filing.

Projection is a sign of psychological sickness. It could just be related to high-stress in your life, but it could also be associated with a severe case of TDS. For your sake, you should probably get an opinion of a professional psychologist.

It is horrible day in the US when questioning the official story in the US is no longer protected speech but treated as criminal. The unelected authoritarian portion of our government is using the full force of government to imprison whistleblowers, shutdown alternative media, spy on citizens, and censor and control all information available to its citizens. Bootlickers who fear freedom will celebrate this. True Americans will get mad and fight to win back this country and hold those unelected rogue bastards accountable for their abuse of power.

You are so full of crap. All their cases are not from his grand jury. He is getting all these cases such as Alex Jones case coming down which is completely unrelated, but still associated with Trump. And he should be pulled because he us a corrupt POS who is hellbent on getting Trump.

That is not thinking, that is simply dismissing because it is not what you heard on MSNBC.

You forgot to add, she also has balls and a cok.

That is the official spin from the court, but why was Merchan assigned to the grand jury trial and why the 4 other trials. One could be luck, but multiple trials is 100 percent BS. Besides, in this high profile and important case, the judge should not have any conflict, and this judge did. The odds are still astronomical even with just 4 cases. And you are too cowardly to go through point by point because you will lose. BTW, your are the one using talking points you copied from the official statement of the crooked court. My points are mine. You are the brainless idiot bootlicking for a corrupt authoritarian power who are interfering in the election. The court needs to be investigated to cut through their BS.