Jump to content

jonmx

Members
  • Content Count

    6,867
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Everything posted by jonmx

  1. Christie, no focking way. He is so two-faced. DeSantis I would hold my nose for as he has done some good stuff, but I don't trust him completely not to turn into an estsblsihment rube once he gets to Washington.
  2. You really are not familiar with the riots the day Trump was inaugurated. There was widespread violence across the country including in the Capitol. Far more violent than Jan 6th.
  3. WTF are you talking about. The libs are almost all transplants from FBG.
  4. I would not vote for Haley with a gun to my head. She is just a corrupt establishment-lite candidate.
  5. The absolutely did. The Dems burnt cars and locked down traffic and attacked people. The only difference is there was security in place to prevent them from the evil crime of entering a public building.
  6. Lol....Biden will be lucky if the Democrats do not off him before the election.
  7. Show me the specific laws of the underlying crime or STFU.
  8. Just a simple reading of the law proves this judge is a corrupt bastard. How can a state court prosecute someone using federal laws? What authority does a state court have in using federal law to potentionally imprison someone? The answer eventually will be he does not have such authority.
  9. And the worst part is a state court using federal laws as the basis for prosecution. What a joke.
  10. Nice diversion. My comments are a out this case which you wisely want to avoid.
  11. You literally have not, you lying sack of crap. The judge listed three possible crimes in laymen terms which could be considered for the underlying crime.. Tax fraud, election fraud, and campaign finance violations. All seemingly federal crimes with no reference to the specific statute which applies. The state has no authority or expertise to be referencing and convicting defendants based on federal crimes. In fact the New York Code defines crimes as violations of state and local law. This case has so many fatal flaws that there is no way for it to stand up to appeals. An honest person would admit such. You have proven that you are not such a person.
  12. Oh the irony, you dumfuk. You know this case is a fraud.
  13. The commoners are looking up and seeing the authoritarian bastards are abusing the legal system to destroy democracy in a lame attempt to silence their voices. The commoners are rising up and uniting with Trump to destroy the authoritarians and their bootlicking cucks..
  14. Fock off buttboy. I have challenged everyone in this thread to identify what the underlying crime was. So far zero. Zero. Nothing. Nada. There is no crime identified that legally makes this a felony. The corrupt judge tipped the scales with fraudulant jury instructions..
  15. The case is a total fraud that was pushed through by a corrupt judge. Anyone whon truly believes in law and order would demand that judge be impeached and the prosecutor to be disbarred.
  16. Lol...right. The DNC efforts in numerous states failed because the Supreme Court stepped in. The DNC is still filing cases in courts challenging RFK jr. ballot access across the country. Keep up the lies that the Democrats have any interest in protecting democracy.
  17. Their little brains are filled by the media and entertainment platforms with rhetoric that Trump will destroy democracy. So the solution is to keep Trump (and RFK jr.) off the ballots and to put their political opponents in prison, which of course is the foundation of democracy.
  18. You are such a cuck. Why not read some legitimate informative information like I posted above instead of worrying about what those suffering from TDS think.
  19. That is cute, but that is not even remotely close to what election fraud is. What is election fraud? Department of Justice Fact Sheet on Election Fraud (*third link) II. Conduct Actionable as Federal Election Fraud, Intimidation, Or Suppression The following activities provide a basis for federal prosecution under the statutes referenced in each category:  Paying voters to register to vote, or to vote in elections where a federal candidate’s name is on the ballot (52 U.S.C. § 10307(c), 18 U.S.C. § 597), or through the use of the mails in those States where vote buying is a “bribery” offense (18 U.S.C. § 1952), or in federal elections in those States where purchased votes or registrations are voidable under state law (52 U.S.C. § 20511).  Giving false information for the purpose of establishing eligibility to vote; voting multiple times in the same election (52 U.S.C. §§ 10307(c), 10307(e)).  Intimidating voters through physical duress in any election (18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(1)(A)); or through physical or economic intimidation in connection with registration to vote or voting in a federal election (52 U.S.C. § 20511, 18 U.S.C. § 594). If the victim is a federal employee, intimidation in connection with all elections is prohibited (18 U.S.C. § 610).  Malfeasance by election officials, acting “under color of law,” such as diluting valid ballots with invalid ones (so-called “ballot box stuffing”), rendering false vote tabulations, or preventing valid voter registrations or votes from being given effect in any election (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242), as well as in elections where federal candidates are on the ballot (52 U.S.C. §§ 10307(c), 10307(e), 20511).  Qualifying fictitious individuals to vote in federal elections by placing fictitious names on voter registration rolls (52 U.S.C. §§ 10307(c), 20511); or through “color of law” in any election (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242).  Preventing or impeding qualified voters from participating in an election where a federal candidate’s name is on the ballot through such tactics as disseminating false information as to the date, timing, or location of federal voting activity (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242).  Registering to vote, or voting in a federal election, by persons who are not entitled to vote under applicable state law, most notably persons who have committed serious crimes, and persons who are not United States citizens (18 U.S.C. §§ 1015(f), 611, and 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg-10).  Falsely claiming United States citizenship in connection with registering to vote or voting in any election (18 U.S.C. §§ 911, 1015(f)).  Voting in a federal election by anyone who is not a United States citizen in those States where citizenship is a requisite for the franchise (currently all 50 States) (18 U.S.C. § 611).  Providing false information concerning a voter’s name, address, or period of residence in order to register to vote, or to vote in a federal election (52 U.S.C. §§ 10307(c), 20511).  Causing the submission of voter registrations in any election, or of ballots in federal elections, that are materially defective under applicable state law (52 U.S.C. § -3- 20511).  Ordering, keeping, or having under one’s control any troops or armed men at any polling place in a general or special election, if one is a civil or military officer or employee of the United States government (18 U.S.C. § 592). -------, COMPLETE FAILURE!!! TRY AGAIN! This is why the judge or the prosecutor did not define what the specific crimes were. The legal definition is way different than what the jury was Falsely lead to believe. There is not a law which criminalizes what Trump did beyond the frivolous misdemeanor charge which is way past its statute of limitations. Not one.
  20. No, anyone is free to call you establishment butt-eating fascists bootlickers. As long as it is used properly, I approve of its use. .
  21. It is never dumb to question the depth of your stupidity. I am pretty sure it can't be infinite, but I have yet to see any signs of an ending.
  22. Are you dumb enough to think that was real?
  23. So you only read the posts which make zero sense?
  24. Unfortunately this case proved otherwise.
×