jonmx

It was a focking memo on a check.

You are a focking lowlife bootlicking Nazi.

Fock you puzzy

Sieg Heil!!!!!! The US is dead.

It is a guiltybverdict

One of the questions the judge explained is that the jury is allowed to infer stuff....essentially meaning it does not have to be proven.

You are such a brainwashed bootlicking moron.

This does not hurt his election chances. It will energize his base.

The Cohen bills could be removed.

Based on the absurd jury instructions, it is hard to believe they could all find him innocent. Pick a crime, any crime. And none of those crimes had their elements defined in the instructions.

You lying focking moron. It has to do with rather Trump violated some tax law, some election campaign contribution violation, or some election interference law. That is neither a means or a reason, you bottomless bag of crap. Those are laws which require specific acts to violate them.

Why is that a question? 1. Election interference is a federal crime and a state can no prosecute for it. 2. Election interference laws are civil war era laws which covers the crime of preventing people from voting. It has nothing to do with influencing an election. The whole basis of this case is to insinuate running an election campaign to influence an election is somehow illegal. It is a perfectly legal act which is why it was not prosecuted at the federal level.

You can look at this very objectively: 1. Has anyone ever been charged for a memo on a check? 2. Has any state ever charged someone with a felony based on an alledged violation of a federal law? 3. Has anyone ever been charged for a felony for a crime which is not outlined in the charges and the jury does not have to even agree what it is? You either believe that American justice system should be blind and all people should be treated equally under the law or you believe this case is justice. This case is objectively horrendous in so many aspects. Everyone knows no one except Trump would have been charged given the facts in this case. The prosecution had to dig deep to come up with this pile of manure.....and have a corrupt judge to buy into it.

Exactly. Put straight people first.

Can you get your tongue any deeper up this guy's butt? The amount of ignorance not to see this case is a massive abuse of the justice system is mind blowing.

Ok....so he is not a retard who believes in 178 genders and believes vaccines should be tested for effectiveness and safety. In other sound science makes you a far right-winger.

That was not even remotely close to what he was saying.

Fock you. You are so clueless. Seriously, fock you.

Because he advocates for advancing freedom of speech?

Everytime you think you think you know what conservstives think, you get it completely wrong. Reagan was very anti-regulation and favored smaller government except on issues of law and order and the military. Reagan absolutely trusted the military and the FBI/CIA, which ended up burning him in the whole Iran-Contra fiasco. If Reagan saw what the FBI-CIA was doing as far as censorship, criminalizing conservstive protests, influencing elections for pro-establishment types, he would have buried them and been 100 percent behind Trump. Reagan loved individual freedom and would never ever ever ever ever bootlick for an big government estsblishment fascist like Biden. You be you, but don't you even try to drag Reagan down to your disgusting levels of cuckhood.

The more times you repeat it, the stupider it sounds. Snopes is being their usual self pushing a very radical leftist spin which is extremely misleading if not an outright lie.

Have you ever heard of a trial where the jury was not given a hard copy of the jury instructions???? This judge is so bizzare. It is as if the judge wants to control how the jury hears the instructions and to be able to spin it.

As usually, you are all jackasses and bootlicking buffoons who don't get it. I really could give a fuk about the source or credentials of advice, but the substance. - Does the advice promote freedom or suppress it. It is that simple. None of you fockers can think for yourself.

Yeah, I am not sure it was wise. For a legit prosecution, having attorney's would help get a conviction. But here any competent attorney would be appalled at the total disregard for law and justice unless they are TDS.

You have to be a brain-dead idiot to believe there is any legitimacy to this case and what the court is doing. This is the most political and most rigged case in the history of this country. What a focking disgrace.