jonmx

You are not only an idiot, you are too stupid to know when you have been completely embarrassed.

We already know you are a dumbfock, you don't need to prove it over and over again. It has nothing to do with the reason you idiot.

JfC....this is their 'explaination': "As explained in his jury instructions, the jury does not have to unanimously agree on the predicate crime, just that one existed." Get the fock out of here you dumbfuk.

It is wrong here as they completely contradict themselves. They are lying bastards who know their readers are dumbfockers like you who can't comprehend anything.

Did you read it. They say it is false and then show it is true. Who's ever alias thst is needs to burn it. What a focking embarrassment.

You are a focking buffoon too. Did you read the last line of the Snopes???..."The jury does not need to agree on the predicate crime for a conviction." So Snopes tells you focking morons that the claim was false, but then in the last sentence they admit it is true. Good lord you are a dumb focker. The crime which makes this a felony does not need to be agreed too by the jury. You have your head so far up your TDS asshat it has to hurt.

I am for equality and individual freedom which is protected from abuse by a tyrannical executive branch. You are a lowlife bootlicking idiot who votes for more tyranny.

And you are focking retarded.

I know, and you are a bootlicking buffoon. The jury system is far better than having some elitist judge up there with some superiority complex and agenda making all the decisions. Ideally you would have impartial people judging the facts of the case and applying the law without prejudice. Unfortunately in this case we have a prosecutor who shopped the most favorable district for getting a conviction who with the help of the judge gagged the defendant and filtered the facts shown to the jury to favor the prosecution. The fact that there was no specific crime identified which would require all the legal elements to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt is disgusting. Instead they were givien a Chinese menu of options that each juror is allowed to come to completely different conclusions and yet they would be falsely considered to be in unanimous agreement. It is a total focking sham and makes a mockery of America.

I can't believe how many dumfuks post here. Most Americans know what s fraud this case is. The entire justice system is being destroyed by this completely corrupt political prosecution. Our institutions are total trash.

It is a mess because there was no case. The only way to get a conviction is the jury gets confused by the insane jury instructions. This case has zero chance of surviving an appeal.

Not for basically a bluff catcher.

But a note on a check issue many months after the election is some unknown crime which mist be prosecuted. These bootlicking dumbfuks need to move out of this country.

We know for a fact there was collusion between our intelligence agencies, the Bidens, news media, social media, and search engines to bury the Hunter laptop story. That was actual primal collusion abusing the resources of government to coerce private agencies which actually altered the outcome of the election. But here we are worried about a note in a check stub which no one would ever see.

Unfortunately is was just a misdemeanor. But they found out when they bought gas fir their car their check memo said fuel. So they got them for falsifying their business records to commit another crime.

What alias asshat did you crawl out of?

What was illegal about how he paid her off? His lawyer initiated an NDA and paid her off knowing that he could make money from Trump off the deal. Show me the statue which makes this illegal, preferably a New York one which the court might actually have some legal jurisdiction over. You can safe yourself time as there is none.

No, you bootlick for Pelosi, FBI and company who setup and instigated the days events. It was absolutely a NAZI Reichstag event.

All legal and happens in every election. Politicians have sex. Using your private company to pay an NDA is legal. Every politicians tries to cover up or put out stories to help their election chances. There are no crimes on the books which criminalize maximizing your election chances, including working with the media to keep stories quiet.

You really turned into a low-life POS. It is sad what TDS turns people into.

OMG, a conspiracy to figure out how to pay a bill.

Nothing dubious about an NDA written up and agreed to by lawyers. This whole case is about taking perfectly legal activity and using rhetoric to make them illegal sounding. This is why nothing about this case is explaining what laws cover this.

As it should happen. Prosecutors should be held accountable for illegally abusing their authority and misleading the jury.

That is because you are not very bright. I was responding to your lying bootlicking post.

Good lord, no focking way anyone really said those words. The biggest felony in the history of America was a note written in a check memo for a legal payment to a lawyer. The prosecutor needs to be prosecuted.