jonmx

We seem to care to the tune of about a trillion dollars about what happens in Ukraine and Israel. Are you now advocating for isolationism?

Keri Lake. Ramaswamy. Jim Jordan.

She also said "the best thing Trump to do for the country is die." So that puts Ann clearly on your side, the bootlickers for the elite establishment side.

Do you believe there is any merit to any of this? If investor 'nobody' submitted a financial statement to a bank, secured a loan and paid it back.....do you think the state would look at that financial statement, disagree with an evaluation, and sue the person for an ungodly amount of fictional damages?

Says someone who is a serial liar who constantly changes her story and had made a living pedaling this story to idiots. Yeah right. Trump is a germaphobe who would never touch such a skank

So you think it is blind to suggest a $545 million judgement based on a financial statement which everyone has different opinions on and harmed no one was legit? So you think it is blind to suggest a memo line put on checks in 2017 could not have possibly had an impact on an election held in November of 2016. If you are so 'moderate' and 'unbiased' could you admit these cases are total shams and an abuse of our Justice system to try to impact the upcoming Presidential election. Humor me and show me how impartial and rationale you are.

i have no idea what 'election intereference' law applies here. Seriously point me to the law. This case is only about some memo on checks which in some mysterous way is considered fraud, but by any real definition of fraud this is not. Unfortunately the judge has a lot to say about what the jury gets to hear and how they apply the law. A heavily biased judge can have a great influence on the outcome. Judge Merchant has allowed a ton of prejudicial evidence in concerning Trump, while suppressing damaging information concerning defendant witnesses. Besides gagging Trump, Merchant has chilled Trump's ability to testify by threatening to allow the prosecution to throw at Trump any and all dirt they have at Trump should he testify. This business records law is being applied in a way it has never been applied before, that gives the judge a nearly blank check into writing jury instructions. Merchan is going to allow jury instructions which will allow a conviction on the most trivial of determinations. The required secondary crime is going to not even require any proof. The only thing this judge cares about is getting a conviction. Merchan does not care if the verdict gets thrown out later.

There is nothing illegal about hiding payments, especially with personal money. Politicians lie all the time. They hide stuff. They tell complete lies about their opponents. They are under no obligation to disclose every sexual encounter they ever had. If they want to pay someone to shutup, 100 percent legal. Paying someone to shutup does not make it true. $130k is a nuisance fee that is a cheap amount to pay to. In fact, that cheap amount indicated it was probably a lie.

Sure Arnold Schwarzenegger paid off tabloids to kill stories. John Edwards paid off a mistress who fathered his child, but he got in trouble because he illegally used campaign funds. Bill Clinton paid off Paula Jones so embarrassing details would not surface in court. Plus Hillary Clinton illegally used campaign funds to hire a foreign intelligence officers to make up a fake report on Trump which was released to try to help her win an election. Of course none of the cases are exact, but unlike Hillary and Edwards, Trump used personal funds and did not claim deductions, making it so he did not violate election laws or tax laws. There is nothing illegal about trying to hide embarrassing facts as long as you pay your taxes correctly and do not make the payments illegally using campaign funds.

Trump was not micro-managing every payment while he was president, despite the testimony. His comptroller testified he got approval for those payments from Trump Jr. Not that it really matters, as a note on the memo is meaningless. It certainly has no impact on the election, and that is what this case is all about. A meaningless memo note on check stubs.

It is fuking pathetic how stupid these brainwashed bootlickers are. Somehow it is a $545 million violation to submit a financial statement which someone has a different opinion on. Or that putting a meaningless note on a check memo is something you can put someone in prison for 34 years. It is unbelievable how far their heads can be up their butt. I am done being polite to these bastards. They are low-life dishonest scum who are bootlicking for the authoritarians.

You are a bootlicker because you bow down to government power. Trump is the anti-establjshment. Trump has no power. Trump never cracked down on citizens or used his massive executive authority to take down his political enemies like what we are seeing today. You have no choice than to ignore those points above because you cannot see past the trump-hating brainwashing you have been exposed to. None of those points have anything to do with what Trump says, it is facts and points which I observed independant of any media spin. I don't need Rachel Maddow to tell me what to think and which boots to lick.

So basically, what we have learned from the trial thus far: 1. Cohen paid for Stormy Daniel's story to extort money from Trump without any direction from Trump. 2. Trump's team agreed to pay Cohen for the story. 3. Cohen sent bills to Trump which Trump had no involvement in, but yet somehow that creates a dozen fraudulent records charges against Trump. 4. Trump's comptroller reviewed the bills and got approval to pay them from Trump Jr., again with no known involvement from Trump. 5. Trump's bookkeeper wrote the checks starting several months after the election and used available catatogory of Legal Expenses with no nefarious motive or direction from Trump. But somehow this created two dozen plus fraudulent records that neither the IRS or FEC had any issues with. 6. There still is no discernable crime which these 'fraudulent records' are associated with. No federal elections laws were violated and laws for state elections don't even apply. 7. All the billing and payments occurred after the election and any notes on the checks had zero bearing on any election, let alone any made up 'election interference' law. 8. Federal laws are not even a 'crime' that applies to this New York fraudulent records law, as a crime is define as a violation of state laws by definition. 9. The court has allowed the extension of the statute of limitations based on unknown crimes and dubious rationale. 10. The Court has relied about Supreme Court rulings which were made to protect the defendant's due process rights to a fair trial to create and unconstitutional gag order which denies Trump his rights. It is as if the Court can't read, but in reality know what they are doing is unconstitutional but don't care. 11. The court has allowed testimony and evidence in which has nothing to do with the case which only serves to prejudice the jury against Trump which by itself is enough to overturn a conviction. 12. Most posters in this thread are complete morons who are thoroughly overcome with Trump-hatred. The only chance of a conviction is if the jury has at least 10 trump-haters on it who can bully the rest into convicting. There is zero chance this stands up to an appeal.

So fuking stupid. We have seen a dozen of document violations by famous politicians and none of them resulted in charges. No one has ever been charged for a memo on a check. These cases are frauds which are 100 percent political and have absolutely no merit.

It is amazing how effective government propaganda tactics have gotten. Half the population responds like Pavlov's dogs at any mention of Trump. A really bad kept secret, the government dictates what the media says and what big tech censors. Open your eyes and remove the shackles while you still can.

So basically, what we have learned from the trial thus far: 1. Cohen paid for Stormy Daniel's story to extort money from Trump without any direction from Trump. 2. Trump's team agreed to pay Cohen for the story. 3. Cohen sent bills to Trump which Trump had no involvement in, but yet somehow that creates a dozen fraudulent records charges against Trump. 4. Trump's comptroller reviewed the bills and got approval to pay them from Trump Jr., again with no known involvement from Trump. 5. Trump's bookkeeper wrote the checks starting several months after the election and used available catatogory of Legal Expenses with no nefarious motive or direction from Trump. But somehow this created two dozen plus fraudulent records that neither the IRS or FEC had any issues with. 6. There still is no discernable crime which these 'fraudulent records' are associated with. No federal elections laws were violated and laws for state elections don't even apply. 7. All the billing and payments occurred after the election and any notes on the checks had zero bearing on any election, let alone any made up 'election interference' law. 8. Federal laws are not even a 'crime' that applies to this New York fraudulent records law, as a crime is define as a violation of state laws by definition. 9. The court has allowed the extension of the statute of limitations based on unknown crimes and dubious rationale. 10. The Court has relied about Supreme Court rulings which were made to protect the defendant's due process rights to a fair trial to create and unconstitutional gag order which denies Trump his rights. It is as if the Court can't read, but in reality know what they are doing is unconstitutional but don't care. 11. The court has allowed testimony and evidence in which has nothing to do with the case which only serves to prejudice the jury against Trump which by itself is enough to overturn a conviction. 12. Most posters in this thread are complete morons who are thoroughly overcome with Trump-hatred. The only chance of a conviction is if the jury has at least 10 trump-haters on it who can bully the rest into convicting. There is zero chance this stands up to an appeal.

It all releative. You are far dumber than all.

Fortunately they would certainly make brown shirts for you.

Not a crime bootlicker.

Still no crime.

There is no such crime as election interference concerning J6. You have zero clue what that even involves and it has nothing to do with anything Trump accused of. Election interference involves denying people their right to vote, which can only occur before people vote, not afterwards, so you are talking nonsense.

Lol...You are a clown. No it hasn't. The fact is nobody here can explain it. Trump has been charged with 34 counts of this misdemeanor fraudulent records nonsense and no other crime. What is the other crime Bozo?

You pointed to some hair-brain theory about some conspiracy law which has never been brought up in court nor has even been used to prosecute anyone. The legal theory is basically, we have a conspiracy to commit a conspiracy but there is no crime in either.

Because when you argue against a case, you refute every point you disagree with...if you don't refute a lie, it legally is considered a fact.

The final outcome is: 1. They gag Trump illegally for three months. 2. They maybe score a scam conviction. 3. Everything is exposed as a corrupt fraud....after the election.