-
Content Count
4,476 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
15
Everything posted by jonmx
-
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Equal treatment and free speech are hills I would die on. I hate authoritarian bootlickers. -
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Quit being such a stupid dumbass.....good lord, you are the stupidest MFer on the internet. -
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Please articulate exactly what Trump did and exactly how it applies to election interference..... -
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
I am not scared. What i despise are Nazi tactics by the left to influence an election. The leftist bastards are: 1. Trying to make Trump look like a criminal with all these phoney cases. 2. Using state money to prosecute Trump, so Trump has to defend himself with his money. 3. Putting gag orders on Trump to deny him of his rights to speak. 4. Tying him up in courts through the election cycle so he can not campaign. Abusing the court system to try to win an election is fuking disgusting. Sieg Heil to Biden. -
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
The whole election interference is such a stupid arguement. 1. Election interference laws have to do with denying people their right to vote. A note on a business check dies not do that. 2. New York law defines a crime as a violation of state or local laws...federal campaign laws are not. And if the payments were made after the election as you state, it is impossible some note could retroactively influence the election. Further.ore, Trump did not deduct these expenses, so there was no tax violation. And Trump paid out of his business account, so there was no misuse of campaign funds. There is no substance to this case. It is criminal that this case is still going on. -
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Do you even know what election interference means? It has to do with denying people their rights to vote. This case has zero to do with that. What exactly did Trump do to violate election interference. Nothing. Please articulate exactly what Trump did and exactly how it applies the election interference..... -
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
The case would have been better off if he did throw Fanni off. Now they are still defending her in numerous court filings. The judge made an error and it will be corrected. -
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
And that crime was..... Come on you can do it.....I am waiting And BTW, technically New York defines a crime in their criminal code as a violation of state and local law. -
Take the $80 ho over the $20 ho everytime. The savings in medical bills will pay for itself.
-
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
And for the 100th time, falsifying business records is not a felony unless it is in regards to another crime. So far they have not told us what Trump did. The case is an absolute joke. Tell me exactly what Trump did that was a felony. -
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Spoken like a true Nazi. Would not expect anything different. At least you are honest about your fascist-loving nature. -
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Historic Trial Day 5: Still not one bootlicking idiot leftists can articulate what felony Trump is on trial for. -
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
OMG, Trump made a retweet! Fuking lying idiots. -
Closer to the Heart and Carry On translate so much better to piano than Tunderstruck, which requires a level of power and bass that the piano just can generate.
-
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Bootlickers hate people rising up to protest corrupt institutions. You fukers bow down to authoritarian state like it is your god. -
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Are you so fuking dumb not to know that what you call MAGAtards are the people and the bastards you bootlick are the fascist state? Good lord, can people be anymore fuking stupid? -
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Can anyone of the retarded leftist buffoons explain how paying off a ho is election interference? And for a little help, election interference is: intimidate, threaten, coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or to vote as he may choose, or of causing such other person to vote for, or not to vote for, any candidate for the office of President, Vice President, presidential elector, Member of the Senate, or Member of the House of Representatives, Delegates or Commissioners from the Territories or possessions, at any general, special, or primary election held solely or in part for the purpose of selecting or electing any such candidate. HINT: it isn't. -
Who here still supports Jan 6 attack?
jonmx replied to The Psychic Observer's topic in The Geek Club
https://cha.house.gov/2024/3/chairman-loudermilk-publishes-never-before-released-anthony-ornato-transcribed-interview WASHINGTON - Today, Committee on House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight Chairman Barry Loudermilk (GA-11) released a transcribed interview the January 6 Select Committee conducted with President Trump's former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato, which shows President Donald Trump pushed for 10,000 National Guard troops to protect the nation’s capital. The interview also shows White House frustration with slow deployment of assistance. The Select Committee conducted this interview in January of 2022, but never released it. -
Who here still supports Jan 6 attack?
jonmx replied to The Psychic Observer's topic in The Geek Club
No, just describing what I see. Your ilk disgust me to the core. You do not value freedom and are too fuking stupid to realize you are being controlled. The way you cheerlead average being unfairly prosecuted and put in jail for virtually nothing is sickening. Seriously, you are the lowest of the low in my book. -
Who here still supports Jan 6 attack?
jonmx replied to The Psychic Observer's topic in The Geek Club
You don't know what it means to be American. You butttlick your authoritarian masters. -
Who here still supports Jan 6 attack?
jonmx replied to The Psychic Observer's topic in The Geek Club
Says the bootlicker who wants to put freedom-loving Americans in gas chambers. Fuk you. Everything I stated was true. You would be the biggest brownshirt in Germany. -
Who here still supports Jan 6 attack?
jonmx replied to The Psychic Observer's topic in The Geek Club
As long as the FBI can keep their files secret and lie to protect their 'sources' and 'methods', we will never know the truth. Too many of our agencies are allowed to operate in darkness with zero accountability for their corrupt and evil deeds. -
Not hard to believe at all. Nothing but mindless brainwashed bootlickers who do whatever their masters orders. As long as some 'smart' guy on TV preaches some propaganda BS, they blindly believe it.
-
Who here still supports Jan 6 attack?
jonmx replied to The Psychic Observer's topic in The Geek Club
No doubt. So many lies: Lie #1: Trump did not offer 10,000 national gaurd troops to the mayor and Pelosi. Lie #2: it was an armed insurrection. Lie #3: it was a coordinated attack to prevent the peaceful transfer of power. Lie #4: The feds were caught completely off gaurd and there were not a 100 federal assets in the crowd instigating the insurrection. Lie #5. The defendants were not put in solitary confinement and treated like terrorist, even peaceful ones. Lie #6. Laws enacted for document destruction in response to Enron apply to anyone who disrupts an official proceeding. Lie #7. The Pelosi Jan 6th hearing accurately reflected what went on that day. Yeah, me too. I am fuking sick of the low-life bootlickers who kiss the butt of their athoritarian masters and are at was against freedom-loving citizens...fuk those guys. -
Trump's NY Election Interference Trial (David Pecker's Testimony Concludes)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Accountable for what? Keeping some ho quiet? That is not illegal. You want to criminalize a candidate for not being 100 percent forth-coming. You can not be this fuking stupid.