Big_Pete

I love camping. I go all the time ( I live in Denver). Stop being a poosay. Just enjoy the time. Get some Weed, Booze, Shrooms, and plenty of water. You'll be fine. Don't forget to stock up on the condoms for all the butt secks you'll be having too.

Umm... that would be Colorado!

It is hell on earth but with worse food. The food is Gawd awful, and you are FORCED to buy food to enter. So do yourself a favor and just eat before you get there and buy the cheapest thing they have so you don't feel as bad for throwing it straight in the trash can. Their sopappias are decent, but that's probably because you can drown them with as much honey as you want. The only reason anyone ever goes there is because they are "suppose to go there". Yes, they have indoor cliff divers and a dipsh!t gorrilla who tries scaring people. But really, that's not even an attraction anymore. The whole place is muggy and smelly. Couple that with food that would have prison inmates begging to get locked back up, and you have the perfect place to AVOID!!!

I heard "Head & Shoulders" shampoo works.

My Phobia? Meeting chicks in here and moving to live with them lol

In the flesh baby!!! lol

Fingernails getting ripped off (such as when you see people dragged and they are clawing at whatever to stay put and their fingernails break off) And spiders. Fock spiders!!! I'll kill them, but I don't ever want to see them or hang around places that have them such as basements or under houses. I have a basement that never has any spider problems (fully finished), but each spring/summer I put a 3 pack of 10,000sqft bug bombs down there. It's only like 600sqft and I pump it full of 30,000sqft of bug bomb because I never want to see anything alive down there.

I'm married now, so how about a 4some

We do by far. More of a legal market means that you need better and better quality in order to be profitable. People from Cali come here to get the real good stuff.

Colorado is obviously the best because I live in it!

Today I turn 36... I don't feel old, don't act old, and don't look old, so here's hoping that it's a good day. And to whoever it is on here who shares this day with me (Wiffleball maybe?), .... happy birthday you fock face

Had a great night... And that's right, it's Me_2006... I knew it was someone. haha And no, not selling anything except my skills.

Care to correct them? ETA: I was thinking of Sweden because it is so similar to Germany in their system, which has a 70% tax. Germany has a 45% tax.

Hi SUX

Still rockin the smokin bod?

My wife (34C) just had lasik about a month ago. She was freaked out that she would be the first ever case of going blind, so it took a lot for her to decide to do it. It was a breeze. There are 3 types of options now-days. #1 is where the grind off layers to reshape (old old school). #2 is the cut flap (old school). #3 is the newest lazers (new school). She opted for the lazer. It's about $4k to do both eyes. She was blind as a bat before, and is now 20/15 in both eyes. She instantly saw better and it only got better from there. The biggest pain is that you have to put those individual eye drop drops into your eyes every 30 minutes because lasik causes dry eyes. She went for her 1 week checkup and they said she saw 20/15. Last week she had her 1 month checkup, so she is now able to cut down on the eye drops. All in all, it was brilliant. She loves it and loves that she doesn't have to wear contacts/glasses anymore. There are minimum ranges for touchup procedures, but it is easier and easier to be within the "touchup" range with the newest lazer technology. Get yourself another consult Beer. They are usually free, so it's only your time that will be taken up.

My original post said "go all Germany" or leave it alone. Don't try to hybridize it. Tear the band-aid off and pick one or the other. If we go Germany and have 70% tax rate to cover all Americans from all illnesses and have 100% subsidized med students so that they only make $50-70k/year, then we'll all adjust after the momentary outrage. If we leave it alone, we will all have to keep paying far less than 70% of our paychecks for healthcare. Either way, any administration needs to pick 1 distinct direction and stop trying to re-invent the wheel. I'd also have dedicated hospitals for all medicare/cade/welfare fockers under their own plan if we stay with the "American" system, that way we can all see our healthcare premiums go down (because we won't have to share those worthless fockers' heart surgery costs). If you're a 23 year old high school dropout loser who breaks his arm on his skateboard and tries going to an ER that isn't a medicare/cade/welfare one, guess what? You either sign legalized documents to have your wages immediately garnished if payment isn't completed, or you get shipped to those 2nd rate hospitals and you can wait your turn behind the 400 pound fatty who stroked out on the bus from the local McDonalds.

The reason why the United States spends more per capita is because hospital services cost more here than in other places. Did you ever investigate why I said "Go all Germany" when it comes to healthcare? It's because patient services are cheap as fock. Did you investigate why they are cheap as fock? It's because the country pays, yes, pays full ride to any and all med students. Because they do that, doctors, nurses, etc don't have half a million in debt right out of college. Because of that, they are paid a reasonable salary. Because of that, they keep costs down. Another factor in America being so expensive is that an alarming amount of people skip out of paying hospitals. When I was in college, I can't even tell you how many liberals I met who had a few grand here, a few grand there in hospital bills that they are/were/will refuse to pay. They say that they will just declare bankruptcy to keep from paying them because they believe that those services should be a few hundred dollars, not several hundred or several thousand. It was their way of sticking it to the hospitals. Well, the hospitals have to make money somehow (or else there is no incentive for people to work in hospitals). So what does the hospital have to do? It has to raise premiums and prices across the board. I'm willing to bet that if nobody in the history of America had ever skipped out of paying a hospital bill that premiums would be at a minimum of half of what they are today (thus rendering your retarded responses useless), if not cheaper. Why does a $10,000 heart surgery cost a quarter of a million? Because all the crapper busting fatties on welfare who eat McDonalds 4 times a day can't afford it. When you have 70,000 of those focktards stroking out and having surgery per year, the only way that it is worth the legally demanded time of the doctor to perform the surgery on them is if you take that $700 MILLION and average it out across the board, thus, raising everyone elses costs to astronomical levels. Do us all a favor and *channeling his inner Mungwater*, Die in a pool of Aids before you open your ignorant mouth next time!

We need to just tear the damn band-aid off and either go all Germany with healthcare, or stick to American style healthcare. The epic fail here is that Obama and his cronies are trying to hybridize it. Well, that just doesn't work. You either have true nationalized healthcare, or you leave it completely alone. I think what people who voted that moron into office a second time are forgetting is that your 1 time visit for a broken arm that cost you a few grand because you don't have insurance is a drop in the freaking bucket compared to higher taxes, imposed penalties for non-compliance, and forced adherence to new healthcare laws. Do they really think its a coincidence that in Europe where many countries have completely 100% healthcare coverage that their tax rate is over 70%? If these morons had 70% of their check taken away whether they had perfect health or broke their arm, they'd quickly find out that the way America has always operated is infinitely cheaper.

The amount the govt takes out of it won't even pay for Obama's valentines day date. Have you ever seen more irresponsible spending of taxpayer money? I read that Obama charged almost $5 MILLION for Thanksgiving. Did the taxpayers pick up the tab for him to fly his family into visit? YOU BETTER BELIEVE IT!!! Man, I wish I could have my boss (in his case, WE THE PEOPLE) pick up the tab if I wanted to fly my family out to see me on my personal time! What a focking disaster of a president.

What's the weather suppose to be like in Buffalo Saturday? Late December in Buffalo is traditionally very difficult for the passing game, so I'm not so sure the Broncos, who don't want to pass anyways, will pass all that much in Buffalo. Not with the running game being so great. Are there always exceptions to the rule? Of course, but if you have good options at WR, start them, because for a run 1st team, being in Buffalo in late December only gives more incentive to run.

Take this for what it's worth, but I'm a gigantic Broncos fan as I'm sure most know. I watch all games and analyze them. I'm telling you, Thomas's receptions will never go down because of Decker. Decker is a #2, not #1 WR. The problem with Thomas is that he drops half of the balls that hit him in the hands. It's that kind of inconsistency that will stop him, NOT Decker or Royal (concussion, so he won't play) or the running game. Thomas dropped an easy 55 yard TD when he was wide open vs the Bears in the 2nd quarter. He admits he alligator armed it and didn't focus. That right there is his problem. He doesn't focus enough. He also dropped 2 other ridiculously easy balls that any peewee football WR would catch. He needs to keep his head in the game and then he will be a bigger, better, faster version of Brandon Marshall from a few years ago. Tebow and Thomas have great chemistry as they've been together this last 2 years with the 2nd team. I think Thomas *should* have a great game vs New England, but until he is more consistent, I think everyone should "proceed with caution" when they make their decision to start him. Thomas could blow up for 10 catches for 200+ and 2-3 TDs, but he could also have 2 catches for 20 yards cause he's dropping wide open 40 yard passes. It is truly boom or bust with this kid. It seems like he either brings his A game or F game, there is no in between. Feast or Famine, peak or valley, etc...

If you watch the games, Thomas gets the targets, but has butter hands in the first 3 quarters (he dropped a beautiful 55yd TD vs Chicago in 2nd quarter). Tebow is putting the ball on the money, but Thomas is simply not catching them till crunch time. Because he gets the looks, I'd say you're safe to play him, but man, he's wildly inconsistent.

iPhone, and it isn't even close!

Yep. As a person who has been with T-Mobile till a year ago when I went to Verizon to get grandfathered in with unlimited data plans a month before they got the iPhone, I've played the "smartphone that isn't an iPhone" game for what, 4+ years? All of them work great for a few months, and then just shit the bed. Regardless of the hype or the manufacturer, or the engadget/gizmodo reviews, they just simply don't last. Remember, when these companies review these phones, they either get them before, or at release, and review them as they are out of the box. Well, the Galaxy S2 is fantastic out of the box. It isn't for a few months that you start seeing that it is a second rate phone that desperately tries, yet epically fails to be an iPhone. There are still iPhone 3G's out there that have yet to glitch out. And those phones are 3 years old! Bottom line is this: If you don't buy an iPhone, you are basically pissing away your money. Sure, your phone is 2 cents, but how much is your time worth? How much is your mental frustration worth? How much is that "whatever" you want your phone to capture but you ultimately miss out on cause your phone decided to glitch out at that exact time worth? I'm guessing the answer is more than the price of an iPhone, which is why you are actually getting ripped off when you spend 2 cents for a phone instead of a few hundred bucks for an iPhone. Hell, if you want a new phone, get a 3Gs. I think they are 1 cent at the apple store with contract. That's a superior phone to galaxy phones, even though it's using 3 year old technology!