BigRedFever

I was curious if anybody knows a way to find rankings for 2012 schedule difficulty by position. It would be very helpful to see, not only who has a easy schedule this year (which is easy to find), but who has an easier schedule this year when compared to last year.

That works on the second try. In other words, if I change the Default Allocation Key from FFToday to Site B (or vice versa) I get the odd result when I hit Compile Cheatsheets). However, when I hit Compile Cheetsheets a second time, it seems to do it properly.

For some odd reason, either the order or the values for the WRs is not right. For example, some auction values are higher for a player that is ranked lower. In my league the WR and TEs are combined but the issue seems to occur for WRs. For example, Wes Welker is listed at #4 with FF Points of 282.5 and an Max Bid of 31. Colston is listed #5 with FF Points of 274.5 and a Max Bid of $36. This is right after I compile cheatsheets. Any thoughts?

I downloaded the new version yesterday and wanted to work in the negative auction values. Would it be the same method for the new version? Thanks in advance. Adam

Thanks. That makes sense and explains why I have been getting odd results. Good luck with your drafts and thanks for the help.

One more thing. It doesn't do the funky reordering anymore, but I am not sure what it is doing. For the kickers I tested it by just putting a "2" in chg next to Kaeding (who was ranked 1) and a "1" in chg next to Crosby (who was ranked 2). I then hit re-rank kickers. To the left, they are in the same order (but in the chg column you can see the new numbers that I put in). In the lists on the front page (e.g. top ranked kickers available) still has Kaeding #1. Not sure if it is because it is ranking by auction values or something else. I think something more should be happening, but I don't see it. Do I need to re-run something else? Thanks again.

Thanks for the offer. I closed everything out and re-uploaded the info into Draft Buddy and everything seems to be working just fine.

That worked great, but when I uploaded the info to Draft Buddy, all of the negative numbers came up as #Num. Also, when I tried to re-rank kickers (I have not tried others yet) in Draft Buddy it did not seem to work. All of the players names stayed put, all of the numbers in the Rank column reversed (so 32 was on top and 1 was on bottom) and the number in the chg column had the number tied to the right original rank (but the wrong player). So, in my original rankings Kaeding was #1 and Dawson was #32. I made Kaeding 8 and kept Dawson at 32. Now it lists 32, 32 before Kaeding in the top row for kickers and 8, 1 for Dawson in the bottom row. The same issue is true for all of the rows. Any thoughts?

That sounds right to me. If you can walk me through that again, that would be great.

I know I have asked this before, but I have a new computer and don't have access to my old emails. I do an auction and always like it to show negative auction values. Even though I can't bid negative, I find it is helpful to see how negative players are (so if I have 6 dollars left and can spend 5 on a RB or WR and they are both worth that, I can see how far below a dollar the remaining RBs and WRs are. Thanks in advance. Adam

I think Lamont Jordan and Roy Williams are the best of the five. Jordan may not be good but he won't be as bad as he has been. He has upside and belongs on a team. You have a lot of RBs, but should be able to trade him later. Williams and Smith are both fine, but I think Williams has more upside.

OK...here's the team (it's an auction in case you were wondering how I ended up with this team). We start 1 QB, 2RB, 3 WRs and a flex (which is usually a QB). Not TE mandatory. My team: Vick Plummer Losman Larry Johnson (and Bennett) Lamont Jordan Blaylock Jerome Harrison Antonio Bryant Antonio Gates Tony Gonzalez Heap Crumpler Bears D MN D Vinaiteri Feely The full deal would have Losman going over for Kitna and it looks like Crumpler and Gonzo for M.Barber and T. Williamson.

I'd go with Williams. More upside than Keyshawn. He's averaging 7 receptions a game and no reason to think that won't continue.

Tough call, but I'd go with Green. Just more certainty there and you don't know who might get the bulk of the carries in Carolina.

I've been offered a deal where I get Julius Jones (and a little upgrade for me) for Lamont Jordan. To me it's just about the RBs...just curious if given Jordan's abysmal performance (and watching the San Diego game it looked worse than the stat lines...if that were possible) if people would cut bait or if they think it's more of the fact that the Ds Oak played against. I'd get Marion Barber in deal too.