Herbivore

good thinking..this might work

haven't we done this before? anyway here is the current list off my brain. Hot Fuzz - I have recommended this movie about 5 times now here. see it. Role Models Holy Grail Caddyshack Dumb n Dumber, Office Space, Blues Brothers, Spinal Tap, Wedding Crashers, Clerks, Friday..all honorable mentions

ok dummy

the racism in this post is too funny

I liked a lot of his work. RIP.

They still put out albums. Last one was pretty good.

I like the Temple of the Dog album quite a bit. Wooden Jesus great song. Jesus Christ Pose is good. Never cared for Black Hole Sun.

Nirvana, PJ, Alice in Chains, Smashing Pumpkins, and Dinosaur Jr. Honoable mention to STP. Core and Purple are great. You could say the Pumpkins and Dino Jr were not quite grunge, but they were close. Dino Jr early work lead to it, and their early 90s albums, like Green Mind, Where You Been, and Without a Sound leaned into it quite a bit. Going to see them open for Weezer and the Flaming Lips soon. It will be my 7th or 8th time seeing them. Pumpkins was more about Gish. Soundgarden is good, but I just never got that into them. Rusty Cage is amazing. Bush stinks.

makes sense, you've been missing the point for a while now

yes, spectacle.

Story says he would. It was a truth social post from Trump. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-offers-take-drug-screening-biden-agrees-same-test

you got #1 wrong..he wants a spectacle. its good for him that his supporters will run with "he wants to debate", you should take a moment a think about this more, and yeah, look at your side. but really, could we ever believe the drug test wasn't fixed by the DEEP STATE!!!!

I just checked out the foxnews website. Trump is challenging Biden to take a drug test before the debate. He wants a spectacle. and then no matter what he will claim to be a victim.

he wants a spectacle

I watched that once for like 5 minutes, and thought, not for me. I watched the Hart hoop one as well, expecting it to be worse than ManningCast, and it was for the whole 5 minutes I endured. Again, not sure exactly how it works, but it seems it would be very easy to lead and manipulate following the debate with this format. The comments could be biased, but just lead you to your belief that a candidate is lying.

I feel like it would be very distracting watching the debates with commentary over it. fact check after and discuss your opinions, but over it while its going on, just seems like its more leading propaganda

I figured, raiders posted it. The story though seems fine, mostly a here is what Tim Pool said article. Unlike most geeks, I can read an article with a timeline or series of quotes and can pick out the pertinent points even if its from a biased source. Our righty geeks cant have their safe space encrouched upon. @Voltaire just a few days ago questioned that Magas had a beef w TSwift, I shared a Rolling Stone article that covered the timeline. He could only whine about RS being biased..real snowflake stuff.

yeah, something not lining up here

I will likely watch some of the debate on CNN. I dont know how these youtube channels work, in regard to would they pull viewers from the CNN broadcast, and therefore hurt their numbers. why is this a problem for you?

that you're a fraud

good catch dumb response

no for me

you're wrong here Volty. In regard to the RS article, it shouldn't have been too hard to follow related TSwift and Magas. There are other articles out there that could line it up for you, but when you wrote earlier "I dont know about that", its there for you to know.

to the Geeks, this is why I and no one should respond to seaturd. I did not deflect. I added no political hate. I added a RS story link that shared a timeline. I don't know all of the points made within said link, added fwiw to show that is some regard. The entire 3rd page is filled with posts from other posters with a political angle. I did not just randomly throw anything in. seaturd, you are a sad troll. I'll go back to ignoring your idiocy.

I know you did