Herbivore

cool

this sounds like crying, which is less funny

Like most Righties, when it comes to comedy, you came up short

he is an authentic liar and narcissist

Murder

I don't really disagree, but this is kind of funny thing to say about a guy who paid a pornstar hush money to keep their affair private.

your party crashed the gay hookup app

that was stupid. wtf is that guy wtfing about

alright max..that is kind of funny

My point to rlld was the people having outrage now, the Rs crying about rhetoric, are full of crap. They, you, are not consistent. I have been, while also calling out your inconsistency.

basically agree..don't think politicians should use that language though

in short..loughner was a libertarian, 2a advocate, compared Gabby to Hitler and Hillary, but overall mentally unstable. He killed 6 people that day. Palin ran ads with crosshairs on them, kept saying things like put a bulls eye on em. Were those motivators or was he just nuts? https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/sarah-palins-crosshairs-ad-focus-gabrielle-giffords-debate/story%3fid=12576437

I rarely have outrage, but I don't think politicians should use that kind of language ever. Its irresponsible. It was easy for me to remember when Gabby was shot and why. It was also very easy to bring up when our Geek righties cried about rhetoric. I suspect you buried previous R rhetoric and are now outraged about D rhetoric. So, yes, your bad.

yeah, that was a crazy post

yeah, I don't think when you are talking about a kid with mental issues you should put to much on their forethought. I think some of your argument is based around these are the people that are going to be influenced by rhetoric, but think there is a legit difference for schizophrenia, hearing voices, etc. vs. loner/loser. I can't remember if there was something specific that "triggered" this kid, but him "turning himself in"(not sure how that went down, just remember that his sister was involved) implies to me that he was just unstable.

that is why I brought up Giffords. all of us didn't miss rhetoric issues. when Palin ran her ad, and Giffords got shot in the face, it was brought up. I don't understand your 2nd paragraph. The link you posted about the Kavanaugh kid was named, "gunman were scheming to take one of them out as well", to which I responded "please", to say he was not scheming but just a kid with mental issues. what am I wrong about?

no, this again is just your bias. that kid had issues, turned himself in with his sisters help. gunman was scheming..please.

descended upon him...

your whole schtick is a red herring so when Trump got into the political arena, media began talking about him in a political spectrum...wow, very inciteful.

so you are following media? Take that out for a second. Did Sarah Palin use violent rhetoric with the crosshairs ads in 2011? Did days later Gabby Giffords get shot in the face?

I know you will bury your head when it comes to anything that pushes against your narrative, but facts is facts, violent rhetoric did not start with Trump.

The rhetoric did not begin with Trump. Palin put districts in crosshairs, and Giffords got shot in the face. The idea that the media went after Trump, and he responded in kind is laughable.

Fine by me. 9pm est for a start time?