Herbivore

not sure what you are trying to say here

Really? You believe everything govt tells you? I bet you don't. In this case, I could see it very likely that they overinflate their numbers, which whatever if they did in general here, as in they only really got 250 and half as many actual violent etc..whatever if that is the overinflating, but I mean more with the children angle. I wonder if the 14 # is real. The DHS statement that you posted says "potential exploitaton, forced labor, trafficking", and @TheNewGirl said the below very confidently that illegal kids were working this weed farm. Were the children there(like 14 yrs and the like), were they there working(were they 20 yr old and needed to be 21 to work there and ICE then called them children), were they there as some mid point on their human traffic rail road. Mostly, I would like to hear more about this case. Someone very recently posted a thread about is human trafficking a thing..this event might apply.

Yeah, I saw that statement. I was looking for something additional that backs up that statement. Its great if migrant children are being rescued from trafficking, etc, I just see it just as likely that ICE would make some false claims from a PR perspective.

Can you please try to add any new information that you learn regarding the bolded? I am thinking this is kind of bs.

has he avoided the wokeness and lgbt indoctrination?

ok, yeah I was reading it as you were saying after May he would be gone from the lexicon for good

you really think he is gone?

FJM has some good stuff. Fear Fun is solid.

kind of had that feeling too

I am waiting to find out when you have fallen for his clever ruse

HT is right here @Ron_Artest, Trump was talking about the people who actually doubt his bs, not the ball hugging lemmings like HT.

well done

6.2 205 54

I bet Trump would think he is a dumbass, probably tell him he is a great guy though

where to begin..jeesh. that bold part is a statement by the writer, and not backed up by anything in either article. there is no dichotomy. as general said back then Dems were saying stop f'n saying Dems killed Epstein etc. you're surmising wrong..again.

https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-kirk-says-he-done-talking-about-jeffrey-epstein-moment-2098919

charlie kirk has fallen in line right quick

this is a dumb argument..even by your low standards

I kind of believe this

RIP David Gergen

I remember you. That's all I got though..

you can't say a guy with makeup caked on looks crazy? whatever. these filtered or not, you have seen that nonsense on his face for a long time now. its sad. he should stop it.

It really is crazy. He needs to tone it down considerably. Everyone in the world can see this. Ivanka should be the one to talk to him. Its just unnecessary. He actually looks fine for 80. With the makeup or tanning, its all you see. Like looking at Sharon Osborne, all I can see is surgery.

Sounds good