RLLD

I appreciate your position on this, and do understand why you feel this way. I do not entirely agree, though you raise some good points. Would you hold this same position, if we instead look at BLM rioters? Would you give them some reasonable accommodations as well?

Oh I see, well I disgree with him on that point. IMHO, if a court of law found enough evidence to convict then they likely need to be in jail. I am not inclined to give any leeway for violent protestors.

Beats me. relevance?

Fantastic! Your morality is now congruent with mine Notably, this moral stance I also held with the BLM rioters as well, might you also share the same stance with those rioters as you do with these?

I do not have the time or patience to go hunting for past examples, I do not recall a specific time for you and I to fall into this situation It is really not that common overall, I usually have to wait for a scenario where someone pretended to care about a situation in the past and suddenly does not, and the political factor is evident.

I disagree. I think there were people involved in that day who need to be in jail, who were wrong and I want accountability for those who physically took action. I am concerned that Trump might free some of them when elected, and I object to that.......

Perhaps. I mean, there is no direct "proof" but I submit there are some circumstantial factors that suggest it could be true.

I will not respond in kind to your personal attacks, that is another distinction between us that needs to be highlighted. You demonstrate my point as it pertains to the modern liberal, "rules for thee" Eventually, the situation will arise where you malleable morality moves in accordance with your political ideology, we find ourselves in lock step. It has happened perhaps a dozen times before, with other members who share your behaviors. So the good news is later we can agree on something.

I think there could be more to the story on this. I have a suspicion that there were pre-election communications between the Reagan team and Iran......and I think there was potentially some more than unseemly things going on there.

I presume we each see this differently. Later, it WILL arise that circumstances change, and the behaviors shift. This happens over time, some times over a length of time. The distinction will be this, when it arises that its actually true that Republicans accuse Democrats of the things they are actually doing, I will call them out for it, as I have in the past. Unlike you, I am not bound by ideology.

It is part of every election cycle...... and I think it comes from both sides..... Anyone remember when the Democrats pulled the tactic out against George Bush? At one point the Democrats seemed to understand they were wrong using this tactic....

OK, its a gamble, I think I get that...... I might submit though, that I do take issue with Democrats declaring that words matter, and assailing Trump for his word choices....while they leverage terminology such as fascism and Hitler, which are so easily proven invalid. I mean, what does Kamala then say if yet another attempt to take Trumps life is done? After she said all this? God forbid the DOJ allows information out that the motivation was traced to those word choices. This is my issue with Demorats, they ARE the thing the PRETEND to oppose.....its just crazy....

I think you are probably correct. She will confirm it, though Hillary did tell Biden that he should not concede the election and she made a mistake in doing that, and then Harris will follow suit and deny she lost for years, while the media ignores it..... BUT......she is then going to confirm .....a fascist......I mean, wont that be political suicide?

Should Trump win......it will be fascinating to see how Kamala reacts.....will she confirm his election, after insisting he is a fascist? OR Will she do as she did with Biden. When they called her out for accepting the role of VP after suggesting Biden was a racist....... when she then said, well....that was just part of campaigning.... which is to say, you lie as hard as you can when campaigning........ like she is doing right now.....

Generally speaking there is plenty of intolerance to be found, regardless of social factors. As a rule, most people are varying degrees of bastard/bitches. That being said, there is no question that liberals are no longer tolerant overall, they are profoundly intolerant.

I agree with this position. Further I would not trust any of these polls, at all, period. Polling is too closely aligned with media, and media overall are just a bunch of lying political hacks.

I am surprised the Democrats switched up, and are pushing the facism/Hitler lie. I think their real power remains in the abortion argument, where they at least have some truth they can leverage. I think it is a mistake to not emphasize abortion and instead focus on the more easily disproven nonsense around facism/hitler......man, its like they are trying to lose.

Awwww, look at that, they used that tactic again.....

You could run for office as a Democrat

Media stalwarts for Democrats starting to stop hiding from the truth

Agree. And if a cop happens to harm an african american, we should not pretend this is some indicator of a systemic issue.

Liberalism is narcissm defined. They cannot ever allow that they are wrong, everyone else is wrong, not them. So to admit what they did was bad is not something they can really do.