RLLD

Thank you for accepting the new way for candidate absolution.

Plus, I want a legitimate interview if I can get one. Those on the right just want fair, and this concept is not something liberals seem to understand.

Sorry, not my rule, when something arises that might tend to negatively impact a candidate, we call it Russian disinformation.....take it up with Democrats if you find it unpalatable.

That has the classic earmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign

Brett is very good in his role. He is a great choice to be sure. Better than almost anything else Fox offers.

Going back to the start. I think liberals can recognize patterns, but lack the wisdom to understand those patterns

This. Just the next iteration of the dumpster fires that came before (Owens and Brown)

Right. I dont think any of us were surprised that Harris avoided Fox, its simple common sense. She would be held to account for the many flaws she has, whereas with the rest of media who are more devoted to political outcomes than truth, they would cover for her (like 60 minutes tried to do) I surmise that Fox would be more helpful to Trump than Harris. If the Harris team was confident in their situation, no way would they risk being on Fox. So that is a tell.

Correct. We all know that most of the media is a friendly landscape for Kamala, Fox news will not be friendly. They will hold her to account. I think Fox is mostly friendly toward Trump, so its easier for him to be on that outlet.....whereas the rest of media wants to end him. With this in mind, imagine the desperation it conveys that Harris is willing to go on Fox news.

If he wins he has a real focking mess to clean up. I hope he can do it, but my god the Democrats have really made a mess of things. He has to address the border right away, and move quickly to start deportation of as many as possible. he also has to unfock the economic damage done, and that will not be easy. But I also want him to gut the focking DOJ….i mean clean it the fock out. Not sure if it will be possible to prevent further abuse, but I hope through complete new leadership the malfeasance that has typified the DOJ can at least be muted

Except it wasn’t racism nor sexism. Men naturally perform better in rigorous physical activity so women will struggle to meet the needs of the position. In terms of simple math, well, math is math, it’s never racist. Racism is used to pretend away the culture of failure that pervades the African American community.

Your allowance for criminals to be permitted to come here and harm people is bad enough….but to pretend that ANY of these people are coming here for ANY reason other than it’s just better here is laughable These people are coming here to this , in the words of liberals “racist” , nation because they know skin color means nothing here and hard work means you succeed here, unlike the rest of the world i care more about the people here that those trying to come here illegally

I see the hypocrisy of liberalism that pretends to care about people and insists that their feelings must dictate how we act….but I guess, not always? Not when it might tend to denigrate their access to power?

I do? That is confusing, on the one hand if someone feels that are a woman we are supposed to agree? But….if someone feels they are economically harmed we are not…. This can be confusing

Of course. Everyone should be innocent until proven guilty.

What if she “felt” she was now a man?

I will wait for this scenario to point to a candidate not protected by your ideological alliance, maybe then we can care about it together

They did something similar in Maryland. The state troopers had some simple math and physical test for academy admission. DOJ looked at outcomes and decided that based on those outcomes the test simply must be sexists and racist. So they lowered the standard. Later, when the lowered standard results in negative outcomes, they will THEN pretend the cops are bad because the lower quality people they insisted had to be allowed in did something bad….. When in reality it is the DOJ’s misuse of data that caused it

The problem with liberalism is that eventually it harms too many people.

You need to go find 30 former parents to label this Russian misinformation, that will complete stage 2 of the denial

Your point has merit. Historically Trump has outperformed his polling by perhaps 2-3 points. That being said, you should temper your faith in these polls. I suggest you cannot trust them no matter what they might indicate. Moreover, the Democrats have shown they are willing to do and sacrifice anything to hold power. Let’s just wait and see what else they try. Liberals have embraced authoritarian behaviors.

those important things no longer matter when a candidate leans left, only those on the right are accountable for the things liberals pretend to care about

I have to wonder, could there be a chance that suddenly like30 former intelligence agents put out some lie this time? And I wonder what that lie might be?