RLLD

YOU......omitted what I said when YOU....only spoke to the piece of it you presumed would satisfy your bias, its the standard liberal ploy to pretend the whole it represented by the piece.

What? When did i say that?

No....lmfao....you really cant comprehend the simplest of principles can you? My point.....was that one should consume multiple sources, because the truth is more interesting than what news outlets are trying to sell you. How this escaped your understanding is baffling. Maybe you really are just....stupid...

Uhm. trying to help you do something other than cry like a little b!trch for just a few minutes, so come up with something brother....what ever strikes you this time....

I havent read up on it. The more I learn then maybe I change my position. I am not a liberal, I dont decide something then refuse to change in the face of evidence. Didnt want you thrown in jail, but more so wanted people to learn not to participate in fraud.

You omitted the rest, framed my post as if I stated only one thing, but you dont see it that way.....do you? That says alot....

Uhm... I dont know, since I am not aware I am doing any such thing....well, its would render estimating such trite nonsense challenging....try something else...maybe toss out a racism claim or something....I dunno, go to the liberal label hat an pull out slip of paper to see what to use maybe

Well, unions lie with the skill of politicians. So we can reasonably assume just about anything they say is a lie. Now, can these judges be tossed like this? What are the limiting principles? My concern is what comes later. Democrats are notorious for taking action that feels great in the moment, but in the longer term are profoundly destructive. My concern is that this sets up the Democrats to be twice as vile....which is a entitlement they afford themselves.

Doesnt matter what you quoted, only what you posted.

Wonderful projection, coming from one of the elite liars on the forearm....you can be just precious sometimes.

Awww, chin up little guy....

If it can be proven, and its not a sham trial like Trump had. Then ok....but on its face, it just seems too much like an act of retribution right now. JMHO

You called? How can I help you?

This guy is absolutely dangerous. He is your typical indoctrinated kid who thinks he has it all figured out, but only wants to do what so many other despicable tyrants have done over the last 100 years....

Some section 8 housing is rather nice. Until its been section 8 for an extended period of time, then...less so..... But the accommodations provided are suitable IMHO. But I get that Democrats hope to manipulate enough people that its not to generate riots and violence.

This is my first question. And then by extension, is this something he can legitimately do? And then, is this really a good idea? I would need to learn more to have an opinion one way or another.

And? You are making my point for me......then again, you likely do not actually have a point....

Agreed. And when Schiff lied about collusion he was in the wrong. Lying about him in some form of retribution is beneath us

Except that didnt happen, just declaring it when that its obvious that is not true wont get you anywhere, try something else....

I am not discounting your point here. I get it. I really do. It always is a good feel when the bully gets it back. There comes a time when we have to choose between what is easy and what is right.

I get it, I do....but then where does it end? We end up with an endless tit-for-tat abuse of our systems just to play political games. I suggest many voters saw Democrats as being petty and childish for doing it, and that helped Republicans win the election. JMHO

Blaming Biden rhetoric for the spike that rhetoric cause is useful.... here is what you should learn....DONT FOCKING DO THAT STUPID SH!T YOU FOCKING IDIOT Admittedly, a simple concept...I would hope everyone, to include and perhaps especially....focking politicians.would have learned... But hey, I get it, liberals learn more slowly than others....have to hurt swarms of people before they hit that "aha" moment

You despicable focking liar....you think I cant pull it up??? Link to Post 2 hours ago, RLLD said: While I think that list simply must have Trump in it, and at the very least key allies they cannot afford to have hurt..... I keep wondering if this is not all some game being played on Democrats. In the past the Democrats were assiduously against the release, and we naturally thought at that time it must be a threat to them.....as we are now thinking about Trump et al..... So while they were scrambling before to avoid the exposure, now they demand its release. Could it be true that by having them demand its release, the admin is effectively removing their gaslighting that its all just political chicanery? I mean, that would be really focking smart and funny of course....and I would love every second of that. Ah yes, Father Trump let his own admin and MAGA faithful spend years fulminating about adrenochrome and pizza dungeon conspiracies before kiboshing the list, cleverly turning the tables on … Democrats? Daddy works in mysterious ways! Like Quote To anyone reading this, note that this piece of sh!t only mentions one piece of the post, ignoring the rest.....you focking liar

I am speaking to the easily predicted maneuvers of the member in question. A one trick pony who honestly adds nothing to any conversation. See, in the MSDNC link I provided even that highly partisan outlet noted "The message from Democrats is a shift in how they used to respond to Epstein-related conspiracy theories and to Trump’s Epstein-related musings." Highlighting from specific people So back then Democrats were concerned about the release of course, but not that Trump appears to be blocking its release.....all the sudden....they think it simply MUST be exposed. So there is this dichotomy, which I surmise is purely political. Trump appears to fear the release, and anyone with simple common sense can deduce there is either something in there about him or perhaps about people he needs to keep in power. The Democrats also suspect this, which is the reason for their sudden change of heart about the report. Now, I am not sure how you might try to spin my words, but have at it brah

I do not concur we should revisit the lawfare liberals have used back upon them. I agree that Schiff is an absolute scumbag. But just because we hate him does not mean we should abuse systems of government and law to take him down. That is what liberals do, and while it might seem rewarding to so it back....to what end? We cannot become the thing we oppose. Its more challenging to be the good people, I get that, but we have to do it. We should oppose this move.