RLLD

This maneuver to pretend Trump told “dark skinned people” to not come here or whatever is a tactic that should not be used. How the people look is not the reason. Now, I accept that you probably believe that it is and will not likely be moved away from that opinion. But I think it important to push back on this false narrative. It does not matter what these people look like or where they come from. Too many are coming in too large numbers, and we need to deter it….period. We cannot be the world’s landing zone for the disaffected. The rest of the world is mostly a sh1thole…..I get it….the rest of the world is mostly liberal…. But here, conservative values have resulted in an elevated level of living, so naturally people want to be here Even within this nation we have observed the migration of people away from liberal sh1tholes such as California and New York and to conservative areas such as Florida and Texas

That’s unfortunate, RIP

……you mean, when polling suggested he could not win…… not about his ability, only about the white-knuckled grasp on power….

I would rather not. The people would be better served if he instead focused on restoring all those policies the Biden ruined. Now, if he also wants anted to fit the DOJ….i could get behind that. The partisan lawfare has been unacceptable.

Subject further adjusted…..I get your point, but good lord…..everyone seems to object to everything…

She seems incompetent, did not do anything to refute that notion as VP. But she very well could be a decent President.....let's not behave like liberals and simply assert that the opposing candidate is unfit.....

Agree. We really do not know.

This. When sane people were calling this out….there were no shortage of people who lied. Being lied to should bother us a little more

Let’s accept that this is a big win for people who work hard and strive Any defense that can be raised against the racist spector of judging people by their skin, color or gender or anything about the way they look instead of what they can do is good The Democrats move here to return life to the way it was the 1930s and 40s and 50s when people could be elevated or subjugated based on their appearance, has to be impeded Democrats never change, their tactics evolve, and they become ever better at hiding their repugnant racism, but it always manifests in the same outcomes

Maybe it won’t be Joe…..it would make more sense for them to consider handing that off to Harris, should she win….. If she does not win, of course he pardons his son, would any of us do anything different?

They do not need more money, did you see the amounts of cash funneled into their fake LLC’s? It won’t be about money…..

Part of me is gratified that people are finally accepting the truth, and not lying or calling people names who try to speak the truth….. Another part of me is just really frustrated that people had to be hit over the head to see this.

I think the Democrats are going to be excited to have Harris as the candidate instead, and they should get a short term bump before she starts speaking more....and people remember who she really is. She could be an upgrade over Biden. I mean, I don't think Biden has been doing anything really, I think he was purely a puppet, and Obama laced his people throughout the Biden WH, was implementing his wet dream socialist fantasies from behind the scenes.....in theory, Harris should be less of a puppet, but would she?

We have a team trying to help some agencies with this. CrowdStrike pushed an update that is causing blue screens..... on a call with thier tech support, listening in.

I have been paying attention and I am not yet impressed, she remains vacuous.....

I think there are a range of polls, and I think we could each find some that suggest a given candidate is considered better or more popular, but I also think that Biden has fomented enough problems for many Americans that it remains a problem for the Party and by extension Harris as well. This coupled with her apparent inability to be of much value in any other way creates some challenges for her. The question is whether or not the irrelevant stuff (gender, skin color) would be enough to sway those independent voters. I think she could make some hay on abortion if she leaned into that..... Keep in mind there is a stark difference in how well people feel between the Trump and Biden terms.....and people remember their lives being much better under Trump.

I think Harris will be the candidate as well, and a better one than Biden in terms of competing with Trump. But in the end I think people have had enough of bad policy, and Harris is just a subpar candidate.

There was absolutely lawfare. And you know what, I bet they could have had some victories if they were not trying to squeeze it all in before the election, and if they had not maligned the law to such an extent, and if they had not put so many charges into play..... Look, it was a solid tactic, but not done well.

It has to be Harris. Cannot be anyone else. Makes sense on every level. She can use all the money they collected and what not...... She checks the irrelevant boxes in terms of DEI...... She is already "in there" so to speak...... She gives the Dems a nice set of elements to sucker voters by being "of color" and such..... The problem for her will be when she speaks. She may very well be good and make a good President, but everything we see and hear from her suggests otherwise. With her you move away from "dementia" and sorta drift into "incompetency" I think it will be Harris, but who would she pick as VP? They could pull in Pete from DOT......that might give the ticket some juice

I surmise the Democrats held considerable satisfaction back then they their lawfare would succeed. And to be fair give their shotgun approach to throw everything they could possibly find at him, it made sense. They know very well that the state has all the cards when it comes to legal warfare, so it made sense. That this guy(Trump) has stood up to their media mouthpieces.... stood up to their procedural firepower(impeachment).....stood up to their legal corruption......stood up to an assassination attempt..... I mean, good lord, in the back hallways of the Democrats, they must just be looking around wondering what is left? Every tool in the bag to pervert out Democracy has been used, short of invoking some civil-based strife...maybe that is their next move?

I have been suspicious of all this intrigue, but am starting to now believe maybe this is real information.

I doubt it.....

I think their approach represents what we should not accept from them. When the media distorts the event with carefully worded articles, that should generate a negative response on our part.

I think you can perhaps come away with two specifics: they were either inept or they were part of the attempt I think most of us do not want to consider they were part of the attempt. On the pro side you have all these efforts on the DOJ to subvert Democracy with the lawfare, while actively allowing Democrats to be as criminal as they please. On the con you have to presume that almost all of them on site were in on it, and likely some of the local cops as well, which I find challenging to accept.....no way this is kept quiet. From what I am watching, its ineptitude. Right now across the government there is back hall efforts on the part of many to offset what they see as a deficiency in the capabilities of the SS in particular. My company is getting some nice opportunities to provide additional security.