RLLD

allow me to save you 20-30 minutes....just reply back to him saying, "oh you got me, I am a hypocrite", his itch will; be scratched, and you can move on to have actual conversations with people who actually want to exchange ideas

Proving that people are too easily manipulated. From MSM to elected officials espousing cartoonish depictions that he is Hitler/dictator....on and on....and they just devour these lies without restraint

Perhaps he was listening to the concerns of the AA community

It might be true, that no matter how hard MSM fights for the Democrats, that it will not be enough this time.

Democrats start moving to Harris as Biden digs in Its a remarkable transition from where she was just six months ago. I am fascinated by this.

How to watch president's sitdown with George Stephanopoulos This should be an opportunity for Biden to win back some support. The setup of having it recorded and then being edited before distribution should help, and then of course having someone such as Stephanopoulos do it will help a ton. I would presume, before this happens, that Biden comes across much better than he did in the debates of course, but that is why this is happening in this way, to deliver that view. If I were him, I would do the same thing. Makes perfect sense. @Sean Mooney I used another link...without youtube

Thanks I guess.

meh

Whaaat? I am not sure I follow your line of thought here. Wait, are you playing the "hypocrite gotcha game" still? Sigh, could you all just be normal on Fridays? Talk like normal people do?

Again? Man, I should really just create a template for all the stuff people ask for repeatedly so I can just drop a link. You seem to forget so easily.....

Awwww, but then he can lie that I didnt send anything.....

Except that I have admitted when I was wrong, or are you going to do that Sean Mooney thing here and lay a claim that is easily disproven? As with him I will offer to you the option to now amend your accusation before I actively spam you with evidence. Up to you.

You think that correlating an assessment of a political party to a suggestion for a one-on-one conversation is equitable and funny, no I get it, I do....I just think you might be off the mark, thats all

Hey cdub, allow me to save you 20-30 minutes....just reply back to him saying, "oh you got me, I am a hypocrite", his itch will; be scratched, and you can move on to have actual conversations with people who actually want to exchange ideas

I am assessing the situation for the poster to whom I responded, and now you stride in....not unlike your brethren with the " you are a hypocrite" move.....I have to wonder, do liberals have anything else to offer? I am thinking not. But the truth remains, and we have some anecdotal evidence to support the hypothesis, so I think there is merit. But, since ideas....well, ones you do not agree with, seem to drive you to disparage with this "hypocrite maneuver"....should we ever have ideas? Or can you provide us a list of ideas we are allowed to have?

That is a lie. I tried to correct your other lie, that Project 2025 is a Trump-driven agenda, and noted that he actually has one called Agenda 27.....that is what I did. Revising what transpired to suit your need to malign me certainly falls in line with your propensity to misrepresent; and also your political religious doctrine.

I think it is rather common for Presidents to make some changes, and get people in place they know will support their agenda.

And to your attempt to suggest hypocrisy my reply is that I would have to lie.....to be dishonest.....in order to ignore his performance at the SOT.... It was an aberration in terms of his performance over the last few years, but I acknowledged he did it. So.....I am not surprised he looked bad at the debate, that is the norm. I remain surprised, and perplexed, about his SOT performance. So, now, your turn....call it hypocrisy, since that is all you really seem to have to offer, and then find me in another thread; lather, rinse, repeat..... or learn a new trick.

Well, this move makes sense on one regard.....these people will work diligently to undermine him of course, as we now know transpired last time....so there is that... BUT.....it should be restrained. I think routing out the leadership at the very least, the highly partisan ones who allow political ideology to dictate their service to country.....and past that being more limited makes more sense to me.

Right, you should realize you could have just thrown out this lie from the jump, saved us both some time. Maybe next time, instead of pretending to be an honest participant and pretending to be inquisitive or eager for an exchange, just put this down right from the start, since its really the only thing you ever do here. Just offering that up for consideration.

Could we consider creating a thread dedicated just to the agenda? While it is likely true that you will find fault in every aspect of the plan instead of debating it forthrightly, I would think that it could be valuable to have a thread that methodically goes through it, who knows maybe you highlight some stuff that people are not thinking about, you could even change some minds....

I was not told he couldn't, nor would I believe it if someone were to suggest it. How about this, and its entirely up to you....but consider....instead of trying to pretend its all the same....and ask 50 questions to corral me into some notion of hypocrisy.....just to defend your lack of intellectual capacity to distinguish truth from lies..... how about you just say that moving forward you will be more critical of what information comes your way.....how about that?

Prior to that debate you denied the truth. You apparently will no longer deny it now, but only because you cant do it any further. You were lied to for years, and happily accepted those lies. Now all the sudden you want to be honest? Why now? Why not back then?

I would have to read more about it to be sure, learn what the plan might be. Right now I am neutral on the idea.