RLLD

Sure, I understand that people consistently apply intent and context to situations around Trump, and those are consistently proven wrong....so by all means, take his statements as you see fit. I think its fine. Not going to suggest you should only see things my way.

I get that. often we perceive things and that becomes our reality, happens to me as well on occasion. The important thing is that you really believe it......so run with that.

I get it, you see it how you see it, and that's fine.

Trump is a buffoon, always saying things that people love to interpret in a negative way, because they simply dislike him....hence the "very fine people" nonsense etc. He usually says something that could be interpreted negatively, and if you dislike him you perhaps will interpret in that manner. I also dislike him as a person, but rather than be lazy about it, I stick to the issue that he is a doosh....but that does not matter.

I get it, I really do, you think he was trying to somehow "steal" the election, again...all good, I leave that to you....I do not concur. Now, back to Smith, he rushed and that impacted his success, but he had to rush because the goal was to affect the election. I doubt he gives up on that pursuit, he just needs to regroup, maybe find something else to throw in the mix, see if it sticks.

Your suggestion as to what Trump did is your perception, and if that is how you feel about it, all good....does not mean that I have to concur with you. I think Smith could have perhaps had a more productive route, had he considered prosecuting the others....but I think not doing so hurts him. He had to rush, because his intent is to affect the election. Had he not rushed I suspect the SCOTUS may have perhaps ruled differently.

I am not sure if anyone wanted to use the legal system to take down Obama, that tactic is relatively recent in use. But I do recall some legal minds discussing it, but as I recall it was just sort of left alone. Not much came of it. But if they were to dilute immunity, perhaps they could go after him? Not sure about that.

They can do whatever they want, we have seen Joe Biden.....it is clear to anyone how bad he has gotten.....he is not likely to fare any better in another round.....

I hope they try to make a bunch of rules for that one too. They again try to make the situation less palatable in the hope that Trump will shy away.....and then I hope Trumps gives them the finger and says "lets gooooooo"

You should really know about this It is not new, and when it transpired it was hotly debated at that time.

Essentially, yes. All the sudden people seem to care about politicians lying, like its new. And none of these people give a rats ass about the lying around inflation, Russian Collusion or the laptop....they just suck that sh!t down.....

I suspect that Smith is "all in" on this. He would love to be the one to somehow take Trump down. I surmise he will double his efforts, and if he has to come up with something entirely new will do so. The race to get Trump will certainly continue, plenty of time to make up something else to use.

There is a historical reason for this......

I think most people do not, so yeah, would agree. Just wish the voters in her area would not

If we are being honest, we knew this was the deal. And when they repeated the maneuver recently, of course....same strategy....find credentialed people willing to lie to hide the truth and enhance their pursuit of power.

The filibuster worked, it ensured that neither side of the isle could put someone too far out there into the court, it was arduous but so what..... So fine, if you are happy with the outcome, great.... I am not....

That is how the process was intended. It allowed for moderation in the selection of judges, which Reid refused....so....sure....setup the situation to get what you wanted that day.....and fock over the women today.....great job.

I wonder how the cannibals felt his family tasted.

These recent acts are new. All good. But if it were me, I might reach out to my elected officials and urge restraint.

Its bluster......but I recall when "rhetoric" was "dangerous"

This might not feed your notions, but its real. Learn from it.....

Yeah, notice no one calling her out as a "threat to Democracy". Can you imagine the media/political response if say.....Ted Cruz said that sh!t? This all further highlights the BS

Correct. Reid setup the problem, and what is now happening is exactly what some of us predicted. It was mind-numbingly foolish. I am animated about it because I support abortion, and that focking retard Reid setup the method for the Republicans to eventually load the court, and eliminate it.... So yeah, I am annoyed by the impetuous stupidity of Democrats on occasion.

I am speaking to the inclination of Democrats to "over do" things because it scratches that itch today.....and the things they choose to do setup problems for them later..... Mark my words, all these foolish things they have been trying.....will be done back to them as a group at some later date.....

I have a simple solution....the next time he starts to wander, don't corral him back in.....eventually he will just wander off...completely....