RLLD

I know you disagree with him on this. I see this is a profoundly positive move, that benefits this nation. I applaud the man for having the fortitude to stand up for us, even if he is only doing it to help his election prospects.

Which of course is not the real delimiter, though poverty is where you are likely to find higher instances of criminality. Culture is far more important an influence.

Not sure, I have never really bothered to categorize the past attempts at election fraud, its an interesting question. Not sure I care how the fraud is done....but perhaps it adds value to better secure future elections.

I have posted past examples of election fraud, going back years.....so yeah, I think it happens and likely more often than it is caught. Not sure why you think it does not happen. Politicians tend to be snakes, these are not "good people"....you should not presume they are...

I am not aware of a specific instance as you have called it out here, why are you asking such a specific question?

Why would I bother to provide you anything? And your request makes no sense; is not congruent with our conversation.

As I stated before, I cannot say if this activity rises to the point of deciding an election. We know it happens, but the system seems resilient enough to protect the integrity of the election. Hillary contends to this day that the election was stolen from her, which I doubt is true...... It likely is happening during every election cycle, and occasionally we catch it.

I think it likely is true, and happens in every election, as I have always maintained.....

I would prefer Trump divested of his wealth-generation activities while in power....but I did not note anything that might suggest he was selling us out, as appears to be the case with Biden.

I cannot say whether it was "stolen" or not, any more than I could for the 2016 election. I think our system does a pretty good job and is rather reliable, so these isolated actions likely do not translate into "stolen" elections. Trump never tried to steal anything, no matter how much you want that to be true. It might be time to stop ingesting this farcical notion of "Trump is such a bad guy" and stick to the outcomes.

Moreover....they are not p!ssed that he is lying....they are only mad because he is straying from the dogmatic principles of their marxist-centric religion....

Hold on.....are you now saying....you think election fraud happens?

While in power Biden has...power....and some people crave it......and some, notably but not exclusively Biden, derive considerable sums of money from their power.....Biden wants power....plain and simple.....so he can secure wealth from it.

Apologies, I may not have understood the question, let me go back and try again...

Biden is your standard politician, and has accumulated considerable wealth on a compensation model that could not possibly have delivered his wealth. Given the evident we have from Hunter's laptop, and the corroboration from the IRS and whistleblowers, we can see that money flowed into the family through the LLC's designed to hide it. So there is that to consider, but in order for the Biden "brand" as Democrats like to call it....to have value....he has to be in power.....and he has shown he will do what ever it takes to hold on to power. So his pursuit of power through lawfare and lies and manipulating the border and fomenting inflation....all harmful to us....but helpful to his political aspirations....until they werent.... THEN we see the shift....NOW he cares about the border.....why? Because the only thing he actually cares about is holding on to power.....

If the crime warrants, sure send him to jail.....now, lets determine how the Republicans might now weaponize this tactic as well....

Maybe, but then again she is only popular at all because she is white....

The posting style is completely different, not even close to the original.

Trump can be whatever he wants, so long as we the people are benefitting....Biden is already only out for himself, but the people are being harmed....so lets go with the guy who at least benefits the people. Now, if you can find us another Republican who can deliver like Trump, put what ever name you want...so long as the outcomes benefit "us"

You echo my sentiments.....as I have stated repeatedly, this is what politicians do....and Trump is not a "politician"...which is why he is so bad at it. Outcomes.....give me outcomes....and what Biden delivers only benefits the wealthy, Trump helped everyone. I will happily take the Trump approach to the border over the Biden approach. Hell, give me someone other than Trump....but who handles the border as he did, I do not care what the name is....so long as stupidity around the approach is ended. If Biden were to return to the Trump-era approaches, I would be more willing to support him....so long as he also stopped being stupid on the economy, and diplomacy....and well, too many other things....

Who cares.....unless he flips on his dad, who really cares....

That would make some sense. But the assertion remains, if you are being honest about this....Clark is handling this with class....no effort on HER part to play the race game, which you know very well would be happening....and in fact has already happened toward Clark.

Imagine....being so indoctrinated/stupid as to believe that a politician (Biden) is doing anything to serve the people.....and is not actually serving his own pursuit of power, and that of his party. This clown had years to deal with the problem, on which he threw gasoline, but now that polling suggests it might hurt his access to power....oh NOWWWWWW he wants to take action. On this factor alone we should ensure he is not elected.....what a focking coward this guy is.....of course , that assumes has has ANY idea as to what he is doing....and is not purely the puppet of the WH staff....

Here is the issue....as I see it....either there is too much complaining about just Clark getting treated the same as every other player....or....Clark is being singled out for rough play, for some reason... Maybe roughing her up is just how they welcome rookies....well then, there should be plenty of video evidence of this happening to every other rookie.....which there is not... So then , what are we left with....is it just some players who are agitated that this rookie is getting so much attention, enhancing their league and adding money to their overall benefit? What might arise if say.....a league like....hockey.....dominated by white people were to welcome an AA player by roughing them up