RLLD

I am stuck on her conflicting depiction as to what transpired. One is true, one is not. Regardless, her lies have no bearing on the case......which makes her sacrificing her credibility interesting.....

I tend to agree. This guy has tentacles into the Trump-cadre, I mean his daughter is tightly integrated into that klan of politicallu corrupt shock troops..... he cannot be the guy that dismisses the Trump case, legality and fairness be damnned. Hell, even Fareed is calling this charade out now, and he focking detests Trump....but this lawfare is increasingly tough for people to pretend to justify...

Agree. I think Cohen mostly just checks a box, he is the prosecutions hope to somehow avoid a directed verdict.

I think it depends on your perspective. So we could assert that she lied in 2018 when she said “They tried to shove me in the MeToo box to further their own agenda. And first of all, I didn’t want to be part of that because it’s not the truth and I’m not a victim in that regard.” So at the time she was portraying things as consensual.....but then again her lawyer did also reveal that she had previsously attempted to extort Trump, but then again her lawyer is a focking liar so not sure we can trust anything that coward says.... And then recently on the stand she stated ‘There was an imbalance of power for sure.’ ‘My hands were shaking so hard.’ and she said she blacked out.......well, one of those depictions is a lie.....I think it might be the more recent one.....but who knows... I mean a porn start blacking out from sex.....yeah, not sure that adds up.... So she either lied in 2018 or she lied recently on the stand.

On the stand, she lied and told a different version of what transpired. There was no need to lie here, she did not need to make up something more seedy.....

I think she did have sex with him, I think that simply must be true. What gives me pause is this <ahem> "revised depiction" (lie) she told on the stand. Now I have to wonder what is true.....

I was not wrong, i remain correct, she lied.....but her lie is not even relevant to the case. Your defense of her is misplaced in this instance.

She should be credible as a witness. I note that there is no charge associated with what transpired between them Why then have her testify to what transpired between them, how odd. OR Could it be true that this testimony was not really intended to be about any "charges", but the question remains....why have her lie on something so easily disproven? Credibility is important of course, for a witness..... I think its was a miscalculation on the part of the prosecution to have her change her story....

She did contradict herself, that is why Maher said as much. Look, she is a liar.....whatever.....most people lie here and there....what should matter to us is this rather significant shift in her story.....why lie? It would not add any value to this case, unless the lie was requested to feed some narrative.... If they have enough evidence, her original story should be enough, instead they have her lie....which is odd.

We already know they focked, which of course has nothing to do with the lack of any crime being present....but that is not really the goal anyway. I am rather curious to see if we end up with a directed verdict, we should.....but this judge has been very tilted toward the prosecution....so its not as simple as it normally would be.....

Well, that is likely true.....

In other words, she lied.....your insistence to ignore this element highlights your own zeal to allow the legal system to be abused to take down your ideological opponent, you represent something lesser than what we should aspire to be

But, are we sure its true? Which version of the events should we now believe happened?

So then, you defend a liar.....because that liar is doing something politically convenient for you. And you do not see the problem with this?

I already did, your inability to accept that she lied is a curious move. Why might you seek to defend her?

In 2018, she specifically said that she was asked to make it about "me too" but since it was entirely consensual she avoided all that. Its all good, people lie all the time. Look at the crazy Kavanaugh b!tch who lied. This is not new.

Not lying, she lied, plain and simple. Which happens I guess, so which version do we then believe? I note the concern where it arises that Trump lies, I infer she is also under the same expectation for truth? Or not really.....since she is being used against your political opponents? I asserted no lie, your defense of someone who clearly lied is a curious move though.

Daniels said he then pressured her into having sex. She actually did.....which is what Maher was calling out. She lied, one could say fairly that she has lied at least once about the encounter......but it would seem that before she was recruited into this current legal abuse prosecution, she described the event differently... Maher noticed she lied, he called her out for it.....I think that is fair....

Correct!! Yes! Thank you, look at how the system is working.....they have perverted the law to a remarkable extent, but the system is still working.....much to the dismay of liberals and their propogandists in the media. It could be true that they eventually find some way to ding him of course, and they seem to be intent to chase this rainbow.....still not realizing that we are on to the game, and their fraudulent legal abuses wont sway us. Its not perfect, but it continues to work.....

I dont much care, if he thinks colluding with the National Enquirer is the best way to get the word out, good on him.... Gratefully, the DOJ did not collude to suppress it, then I would have a problem with it.....

Since all of them are liars, I will prefer to have the one that does not harm our nation over the one that does, so returning Trump means we can hope for better things....

The lie is that Trump forced her

This is essentially correct. If the left does not like something they simply throw a negative label at it, instead of explaining themselves.

The American system of government of course

That might be true, luckily we have a system that ensures that wont happen, something perhaps underappreciated about us....